東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Deuteronomy as Mischgattung: A compa...

Huddleston, Neal A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Deuteronomy as Mischgattung: A comparative and contrastive discourse analysis of Deuteronomy and ancient Near Eastern treaty traditions.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Deuteronomy as Mischgattung: A comparative and contrastive discourse analysis of Deuteronomy and ancient Near Eastern treaty traditions./
作者:	Huddleston, Neal A.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
面頁冊數:	1217 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-01A(E).
標題:	Biblical studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3720955
ISBN:	9781339021034

Deuteronomy as Mischgattung: A comparative and contrastive discourse analysis of Deuteronomy and ancient Near Eastern treaty traditions.
Huddleston, Neal A.

Deuteronomy as Mischgattung: A comparative and contrastive discourse analysis of Deuteronomy and ancient Near Eastern treaty traditions. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 1217 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Trinity International University, 2015.

The deuteronomic corpus comprises an intentional hybridization of discourse types incorporating a composite structure analogous to the Hittite subordination treaty in its interdiscourse relationships. Deuteronomy's synchronic form encapsulates this composite genre in parenetic and theologically significant language. While this composite is its central interdiscourse structure, it is framed by Mosaic parenesis and a theologized historiographic tradition which is carried forward by its final narratorial framing into the deuteronomic present. The project advances a discourse analytical methodology based on a Hallidayan hierarchical model as applied by Robert Longacre. This text-linguistic approach discerns ten unique discourse types within Deuteronomy, and establishes seven unique ancient Near Eastern treaty traditions covering all significant treaty texts from 2500-600 BC. These ancient Near Eastern treaty traditions are compared and contrasted with one-another in order to determine interdiscourse markers unique to each tradition. A further comparison and contrast of Deuteronomy with these texts and their observed traditions demonstrates a significant number of marked interdiscourse parallels, especially with the Hittite general tradition. As demonstrated early in the project through linguistic, onomastic, and archaeological means, the influence of Anatolian political culture is both feasible and probable in early Israel and her subsequent monarchy. Deuteronomy nonetheless expresses a significant transformation of these parallels on both formal and functional levels. The project concludes by applying its contributions to select contemporary perspectives related to its topic.

ISBN: 9781339021034Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122820
Biblical studies.

Deuteronomy as Mischgattung: A comparative and contrastive discourse analysis of Deuteronomy and ancient Near Eastern treaty traditions.
LDR:02704nmm a2200301 4500 001 2116583
005 20170428103042.5
008 180830s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339021034
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3720955
035 $a AAI3720955
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Huddleston, Neal A. $3 3278316
245 1 0 $a Deuteronomy as Mischgattung: A comparative and contrastive discourse analysis of Deuteronomy and ancient Near Eastern treaty traditions.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 1217 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Richard E. Averbeck.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Trinity International University, 2015.
520 $a The deuteronomic corpus comprises an intentional hybridization of discourse types incorporating a composite structure analogous to the Hittite subordination treaty in its interdiscourse relationships. Deuteronomy's synchronic form encapsulates this composite genre in parenetic and theologically significant language. While this composite is its central interdiscourse structure, it is framed by Mosaic parenesis and a theologized historiographic tradition which is carried forward by its final narratorial framing into the deuteronomic present. The project advances a discourse analytical methodology based on a Hallidayan hierarchical model as applied by Robert Longacre. This text-linguistic approach discerns ten unique discourse types within Deuteronomy, and establishes seven unique ancient Near Eastern treaty traditions covering all significant treaty texts from 2500-600 BC. These ancient Near Eastern treaty traditions are compared and contrasted with one-another in order to determine interdiscourse markers unique to each tradition. A further comparison and contrast of Deuteronomy with these texts and their observed traditions demonstrates a significant number of marked interdiscourse parallels, especially with the Hittite general tradition. As demonstrated early in the project through linguistic, onomastic, and archaeological means, the influence of Anatolian political culture is both feasible and probable in early Israel and her subsequent monarchy. Deuteronomy nonetheless expresses a significant transformation of these parallels on both formal and functional levels. The project concludes by applying its contributions to select contemporary perspectives related to its topic.
590 $a School code: 1522.
650 4 $a Biblical studies. $3 2122820
650 4 $a Ancient languages. $3 2122823
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
690 $a 0321
690 $a 0289
690 $a 0290
710 2 $a Trinity International University. $b Theological Studies. $3 2091977
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-01A(E).
790 $a 1522
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3720955