東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An advocacy coalition framework anal...

Bishop, Marines.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An advocacy coalition framework analysis of the development of offshore wind energy in South Carolina.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An advocacy coalition framework analysis of the development of offshore wind energy in South Carolina./
作者:	Bishop, Marines.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
面頁冊數:	96 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-02.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International55-02(E).
標題:	Alternative Energy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1603152
ISBN:	9781339206677

An advocacy coalition framework analysis of the development of offshore wind energy in South Carolina.
Bishop, Marines.

An advocacy coalition framework analysis of the development of offshore wind energy in South Carolina. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 96 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-02.

Thesis (M.S.)--College of Charleston, 2015.

Offshore winds blow considerably harder and more uniformly than on land, and can thus produce higher amounts of electricity. Design, installation, and distribution of an offshore wind farm is more difficult and expensive, but is nevertheless a compelling energy source. With its relatively shallow offshore waters South Carolina has the potential to offer one of the first offshore wind farms in the United States, arguably ideal for wind-farm construction and presenting outstanding potential for the state's growth and innovation. This study analyzes the policy process involved in the establishment of an offshore wind industry in South Carolina through the use of Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) concepts. The ACF studies policy process by analyzing policy subsystems, understanding that stakeholders motivated by belief systems influence policy subsystem affairs, and recognizing the assembly of these stakeholders into coalitions as the best way to simplify the analysis. The study interviewed and analyzed responses from stakeholders involved to different but significant degrees with South Carolina offshore wind industry development, allowing for their categorization into coalitions. Responses and discussion analysis through the implementation of ACF concepts revealed, among other observations, direct relationships of opinions to stakeholder's belief systems. Most stakeholders agreed that a potential for positive outputs is real and substantial, but differed in opinion when discussing challenges for offshore wind development in South Carolina. The study importantly considers policy subsystem implications at national and regional levels, underlining the importance of learning from other offshore wind markets and policy arenas worldwide. In this sense, this study's discussions and conclusions are a step towards the right direction.

ISBN: 9781339206677Subjects--Topical Terms:

1035473
Alternative Energy.

An advocacy coalition framework analysis of the development of offshore wind energy in South Carolina.
LDR:02799nmm a2200313 4500 001 2116543
005 20170428103030.5
008 180830s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339206677
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1603152
035 $a AAI1603152
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Bishop, Marines. $3 3278271
245 1 3 $a An advocacy coalition framework analysis of the development of offshore wind energy in South Carolina.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 96 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-02.
500 $a Adviser: Matthew Nowlin.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--College of Charleston, 2015.
520 $a Offshore winds blow considerably harder and more uniformly than on land, and can thus produce higher amounts of electricity. Design, installation, and distribution of an offshore wind farm is more difficult and expensive, but is nevertheless a compelling energy source. With its relatively shallow offshore waters South Carolina has the potential to offer one of the first offshore wind farms in the United States, arguably ideal for wind-farm construction and presenting outstanding potential for the state's growth and innovation. This study analyzes the policy process involved in the establishment of an offshore wind industry in South Carolina through the use of Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) concepts. The ACF studies policy process by analyzing policy subsystems, understanding that stakeholders motivated by belief systems influence policy subsystem affairs, and recognizing the assembly of these stakeholders into coalitions as the best way to simplify the analysis. The study interviewed and analyzed responses from stakeholders involved to different but significant degrees with South Carolina offshore wind industry development, allowing for their categorization into coalitions. Responses and discussion analysis through the implementation of ACF concepts revealed, among other observations, direct relationships of opinions to stakeholder's belief systems. Most stakeholders agreed that a potential for positive outputs is real and substantial, but differed in opinion when discussing challenges for offshore wind development in South Carolina. The study importantly considers policy subsystem implications at national and regional levels, underlining the importance of learning from other offshore wind markets and policy arenas worldwide. In this sense, this study's discussions and conclusions are a step towards the right direction.
590 $a School code: 1000.
650 4 $a Alternative Energy. $3 1035473
650 4 $a Environmental management. $3 535182
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Energy. $3 876794
690 $a 0363
690 $a 0474
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0791
710 2 $a College of Charleston. $b Environmental Studies. $3 1263032
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 55-02(E).
790 $a 1000
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1603152