東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Care, control, or criminalization? D...

Upton, Lindsey L.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Care, control, or criminalization? Discourses on homelessness and social responses.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Care, control, or criminalization? Discourses on homelessness and social responses./
作者:	Upton, Lindsey L.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	209 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-04A(E).
標題:	Criminology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10163686
ISBN:	9781369183641

Care, control, or criminalization? Discourses on homelessness and social responses.
Upton, Lindsey L.

Care, control, or criminalization? Discourses on homelessness and social responses. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 209 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-04(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Old Dominion University, 2016.

There has been a resurgence of political and media interest in homelessness, particularly in major urban areas throughout the United States. This interest is credited to a number of cities that declared a State of Emergency (SOE) due to their homelessness crisis in 2015. The motivation to declare homelessness as an urgent priority of local politics assists cities in temporarily overcoming longstanding budget and bureaucratic barriers. Undoubtedly, the criminal justice system is part of social response following a declared SOE, and homelessness is not an exception. Little attention has explored the historical, social, and political processes of problematizing homelessness from a criminological perspective. Drawing on theoretical insight from David Garland, Jonathan Simon, and Loic Wacquant, the politics of homelessness and crime found in New York City (NYC) is interrogated through discourses in the New York Times (NYT) from 1970-2012. This research examines how talk about homelessness responses creates, enacts, and enforces technologies of the criminal justice system. This study finds the politicization of homelessness over time produces and legitimates increased controls and management of marginalized groups, where state authorities are experts, and the boundaries of care and criminalization are blurred. This study has implications for the management of homelessness and policies that further socially exclude the homeless from overcoming such conditions.

ISBN: 9781369183641Subjects--Topical Terms:

533274
Criminology.

Care, control, or criminalization? Discourses on homelessness and social responses.
LDR:02417nmm a2200301 4500 001 2116420
005 20170428111647.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369183641
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10163686
035 $a AAI10163686
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Upton, Lindsey L. $3 3278129
245 1 0 $a Care, control, or criminalization? Discourses on homelessness and social responses.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 209 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-04(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Ruth A. Triplett.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Old Dominion University, 2016.
520 $a There has been a resurgence of political and media interest in homelessness, particularly in major urban areas throughout the United States. This interest is credited to a number of cities that declared a State of Emergency (SOE) due to their homelessness crisis in 2015. The motivation to declare homelessness as an urgent priority of local politics assists cities in temporarily overcoming longstanding budget and bureaucratic barriers. Undoubtedly, the criminal justice system is part of social response following a declared SOE, and homelessness is not an exception. Little attention has explored the historical, social, and political processes of problematizing homelessness from a criminological perspective. Drawing on theoretical insight from David Garland, Jonathan Simon, and Loic Wacquant, the politics of homelessness and crime found in New York City (NYC) is interrogated through discourses in the New York Times (NYT) from 1970-2012. This research examines how talk about homelessness responses creates, enacts, and enforces technologies of the criminal justice system. This study finds the politicization of homelessness over time produces and legitimates increased controls and management of marginalized groups, where state authorities are experts, and the boundaries of care and criminalization are blurred. This study has implications for the management of homelessness and policies that further socially exclude the homeless from overcoming such conditions.
590 $a School code: 0418.
650 4 $a Criminology. $3 533274
650 4 $a Sociology. $3 516174
650 4 $a Social research. $3 2122687
690 $a 0627
690 $a 0626
690 $a 0344
710 2 $a Old Dominion University. $b Sociology/Criminal Justice. $3 3278130
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-04A(E).
790 $a 0418
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10163686