東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

What I speak, who I am: Patterns of...

Rasi Gregorutti, Sylvia Beatrice.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

What I speak, who I am: Patterns of language choice and ethnolinguistic identity among Mexican-American adolescents.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	What I speak, who I am: Patterns of language choice and ethnolinguistic identity among Mexican-American adolescents./
作者:	Rasi Gregorutti, Sylvia Beatrice.
面頁冊數:	309 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-01, Section: A, page: 1300.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-01A.
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3077759
ISBN:	9780493981734

What I speak, who I am: Patterns of language choice and ethnolinguistic identity among Mexican-American adolescents.
Rasi Gregorutti, Sylvia Beatrice.

What I speak, who I am: Patterns of language choice and ethnolinguistic identity among Mexican-American adolescents. - 309 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-01, Section: A, page: 1300.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2002.

Ethnolinguistic Identity Theory (Beebe and Giles, 1984; Hildebrandt and Giles, 1983; Giles and Johnson, 1987) indicates that a group's ethnolinguistic vitality (EV) and subjective perceptions of EV (i.e., SEV) impact its likelihood of survival. Research of EV and SEV has been primarily conducted outside the U.S., with few studies of Hispanic ethno-national groups. Studies examining U.S. Latinos are limited to Barker, Giles, Noels, Duck, Hecht, and Clement (2002), Gao and Schmidt (1992), and Giles and Barker (2002) and only Gao and Schmidt's analysis features SEV from the minority perspective. Despite a prominent role assigned to ethnic language use and identification, their relationship to EV and SEV remains unexplored.

ISBN: 9780493981734Subjects--Topical Terms:

524476
Linguistics.

What I speak, who I am: Patterns of language choice and ethnolinguistic identity among Mexican-American adolescents.
LDR:03484nmm a2200313 4500 001 2115406
005 20170313072439.5
008 180830s2002 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780493981734
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3077759
035 $a AAI3077759
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Rasi Gregorutti, Sylvia Beatrice. $3 3277058
245 1 0 $a What I speak, who I am: Patterns of language choice and ethnolinguistic identity among Mexican-American adolescents.
300 $a 309 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-01, Section: A, page: 1300.
500 $a Mentor: Ralph W. Fasold.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2002.
520 $a Ethnolinguistic Identity Theory (Beebe and Giles, 1984; Hildebrandt and Giles, 1983; Giles and Johnson, 1987) indicates that a group's ethnolinguistic vitality (EV) and subjective perceptions of EV (i.e., SEV) impact its likelihood of survival. Research of EV and SEV has been primarily conducted outside the U.S., with few studies of Hispanic ethno-national groups. Studies examining U.S. Latinos are limited to Barker, Giles, Noels, Duck, Hecht, and Clement (2002), Gao and Schmidt (1992), and Giles and Barker (2002) and only Gao and Schmidt's analysis features SEV from the minority perspective. Despite a prominent role assigned to ethnic language use and identification, their relationship to EV and SEV remains unexplored.
520 $a Quantitative and qualitative methods were employed to study a bi-ethnic Northern California community. Objective EV measures were based on public and ethnographic data. Subjective EV measures were furnished by 51 Mexican-American (MA) adolescents who completed a survey incorporating Bourhis, Giles, and Rosenthal's (1981) Subjective Vitality Questionnaire. Updating of Giles, Bourhis, and Taylor's (1977) MA EV configuration was based on ethnographic data, since this and other studies (e.g., Ros, Huici, & Cano, 1994) furnish scant procedural information. T-test, MANOVA, and multiple regression analyses indicated respondents felt MA demography and status to be comparable to or greater than that of the Anglo-American (AA) majority. MA institutional support was rated lower than the majority, particularly with respect to language. Those identifying strongly as MA indicated greater MA SEV and, contrary to expectations, greater AA SEV than did weak identifiers. Chi-squared and Fisher's Exact Test results indicated Mexican to be the preferred ethnic identity, with choice unrelated to questionnaire language, ethnic identification, or country of birth. With one exception, factor analysis of language domains conformed to a typical English/Spanish division. T-tests showed virtually no relation between identity and language choice. This disconnect among relatively recent immigrants suggests a possible acceleration in language shift, as hypothesized in Lopez's (1978) early study of urban Chicanos.
520 $a Findings of this study are relevant to individuals investigating language maintenance and shift, Mexican-Americans in California, adolescent immigrants, language use domains, ethnic identity theory, ethnic identification, and present implications for English-only legislation.
590 $a School code: 0076.
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
650 4 $a Ethnic studies. $2 bicssc $3 1556779
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0631
710 2 $a Georgetown University. $3 1017582
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-01A.
790 $a 0076
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2002
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3077759