東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Affirmative action reconceived: A co...

Ford, Abdel Rahman.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Affirmative action reconceived: A comparative study of constitutional precommitments to group preferences for racial minorities and women.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Affirmative action reconceived: A comparative study of constitutional precommitments to group preferences for racial minorities and women./
作者:	Ford, Abdel Rahman.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	326 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-07(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-07A(E).
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10009739
ISBN:	9781339461656

Affirmative action reconceived: A comparative study of constitutional precommitments to group preferences for racial minorities and women.
Ford, Abdel Rahman.

Affirmative action reconceived: A comparative study of constitutional precommitments to group preferences for racial minorities and women. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 326 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-07(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2016.

The nation-state's struggle with liberal individualism on the one hand and the recognition of group rights on the other is well documented in the literatures on constitutionalism, constitution-making, comparative politics and racial/ethnic relations. However, the manner in which this conundrum manifests in a state's acceptance or rejection of affirmative action has been under-discussed. Traditional approaches to the study of affirmative action are inadequate because they tend to circumscribe the universe of policies and programs that may qualify as affirmative action by focusing only on certain groups, issue domains or countries. More specifically, current scholarship on affirmative action suffers from several substantive and methodological shortcomings: (1) a neglect of the constitutional foundations of affirmative action, (2) a fundamental definitional uncertainty when it comes to understanding what affirmative action actually is, (3) a lack of a clear analytical framework with which to classify various types of affirmative action policies, (4) a narrow focus on single-case studies, and (5) a paucity of inter-group and intra-group comparisons. To address these lacunae, this study focuses on constitutional precommitments to affirmative action. Prior to any substantive analysis, this study first proposes a consensus definition of affirmative action and develops a universal typology and sub-typology with which to categorize, analyze and compare affirmative action precommitments. Next, this study employs a large N comparative methodology to examine the constitutions of 30 countries and categorize affirmative action precommitments through the use of constitutional textual analysis and secondary source historical materials. Finally, this study compares affirmative action precommitments -- both inter-group and intra-group -- for racial/ethnic minorities and women across the sample. There are three principal substantive findings. First, although liberal individualism remains central to the constitution-making process, all cases exhibited constitutional acknowledgement of some form of group rights and/or preferences. Second, for various reasons, racial/ethnic minorities tend to fare better than women when it comes to the overall prevalence of preferential constitutional precommitments. Third, historical evidence suggests that both endogenous and exogenous political pressures, such as internal ethnic conflicts and global human rights movements, matter when it comes to racial/ethnic minorities' or women's chances of having affirmative action provisions included in constitutions during the constitution-making process.

ISBN: 9781339461656Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.

Affirmative action reconceived: A comparative study of constitutional precommitments to group preferences for racial minorities and women.
LDR:03697nmm a2200313 4500 001 2111612
005 20180529094434.5
008 180626s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339461656
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10009739
035 $a (MiAaPQ)upenngdas:12031
035 $a AAI10009739
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ford, Abdel Rahman. $3 3265735
245 1 0 $a Affirmative action reconceived: A comparative study of constitutional precommitments to group preferences for racial minorities and women.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 326 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-07(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Rogers Smith.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2016.
520 $a The nation-state's struggle with liberal individualism on the one hand and the recognition of group rights on the other is well documented in the literatures on constitutionalism, constitution-making, comparative politics and racial/ethnic relations. However, the manner in which this conundrum manifests in a state's acceptance or rejection of affirmative action has been under-discussed. Traditional approaches to the study of affirmative action are inadequate because they tend to circumscribe the universe of policies and programs that may qualify as affirmative action by focusing only on certain groups, issue domains or countries. More specifically, current scholarship on affirmative action suffers from several substantive and methodological shortcomings: (1) a neglect of the constitutional foundations of affirmative action, (2) a fundamental definitional uncertainty when it comes to understanding what affirmative action actually is, (3) a lack of a clear analytical framework with which to classify various types of affirmative action policies, (4) a narrow focus on single-case studies, and (5) a paucity of inter-group and intra-group comparisons. To address these lacunae, this study focuses on constitutional precommitments to affirmative action. Prior to any substantive analysis, this study first proposes a consensus definition of affirmative action and develops a universal typology and sub-typology with which to categorize, analyze and compare affirmative action precommitments. Next, this study employs a large N comparative methodology to examine the constitutions of 30 countries and categorize affirmative action precommitments through the use of constitutional textual analysis and secondary source historical materials. Finally, this study compares affirmative action precommitments -- both inter-group and intra-group -- for racial/ethnic minorities and women across the sample. There are three principal substantive findings. First, although liberal individualism remains central to the constitution-making process, all cases exhibited constitutional acknowledgement of some form of group rights and/or preferences. Second, for various reasons, racial/ethnic minorities tend to fare better than women when it comes to the overall prevalence of preferential constitutional precommitments. Third, historical evidence suggests that both endogenous and exogenous political pressures, such as internal ethnic conflicts and global human rights movements, matter when it comes to racial/ethnic minorities' or women's chances of having affirmative action provisions included in constitutions during the constitution-making process.
590 $a School code: 0175.
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Women's studies. $3 526816
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0453
690 $a 0398
710 2 0 $a University of Pennsylvania. $b Political Science. $3 2100856
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-07A(E).
790 $a 0175
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10009739