東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The draft common frame of reference ...

Santos Silva, Marta.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The draft common frame of reference as a "toolbox" for Domestic Courts = a solution to the pure economic loss problem from a comparative perspective /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The draft common frame of reference as a "toolbox" for Domestic Courts/ by Marta Santos Silva.
其他題名:	a solution to the pure economic loss problem from a comparative perspective /
作者:	Santos Silva, Marta.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2017.,
面頁冊數:	xxxi, 275 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
內容註:	Part I - The Portuguese Civil Code Through the Prism of the Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR): Portuguese Codified Law and its Broad-minded Attitude Towards Comparative Law and Jurisprudence from a Historical Perspective -- Judges as Key Players in the Development of European Private Law -- A Role for the DCFR in Domestic Adjudication -- Part II - A Plea for the Informal Acceptance of the Concept of "Legally Relevant Damage" as a Way to Break the Stalemate Created by the Category "Pure Economic Losses": General Remarks on the Non-contractual Liability Regime Arising out of Damage Caused to Another in the Portuguese Civil Code -- Drawbacks of Unlawfulness and Compensation of Pure Economic Loss -- General Remarks on the Non-contractual Liability Regime Arising out of Damage Caused to Another in the Draft Common Frame of Reference (PEL. Liab. Dam.) -- Reception of the DCFR's Concept of "Legally Relevant Damage" and its Potential for the Protection of Pure Economic Interests -- Part III - Critical Remarks: Cutting the Gordian Knot with the DCFR: The Deadlock of Pure Economic Loss and the Quest for a Solution -- Could Portuguese Courts Use the DCFR over National Sources of Law? -- Should the Portuguese Courts Use the DCFR Concept of "Legally Relevant Damage"?.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Procedure (Law) - United States. -
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52923-3
ISBN:	9783319529233

The draft common frame of reference as a "toolbox" for Domestic Courts = a solution to the pure economic loss problem from a comparative perspective /
Santos Silva, Marta.

The draft common frame of reference as a "toolbox" for Domestic Courtsa solution to the pure economic loss problem from a comparative perspective /[electronic resource] :by Marta Santos Silva. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2017. - xxxi, 275 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Part I - The Portuguese Civil Code Through the Prism of the Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR): Portuguese Codified Law and its Broad-minded Attitude Towards Comparative Law and Jurisprudence from a Historical Perspective -- Judges as Key Players in the Development of European Private Law -- A Role for the DCFR in Domestic Adjudication -- Part II - A Plea for the Informal Acceptance of the Concept of "Legally Relevant Damage" as a Way to Break the Stalemate Created by the Category "Pure Economic Losses": General Remarks on the Non-contractual Liability Regime Arising out of Damage Caused to Another in the Portuguese Civil Code -- Drawbacks of Unlawfulness and Compensation of Pure Economic Loss -- General Remarks on the Non-contractual Liability Regime Arising out of Damage Caused to Another in the Draft Common Frame of Reference (PEL. Liab. Dam.) -- Reception of the DCFR's Concept of "Legally Relevant Damage" and its Potential for the Protection of Pure Economic Interests -- Part III - Critical Remarks: Cutting the Gordian Knot with the DCFR: The Deadlock of Pure Economic Loss and the Quest for a Solution -- Could Portuguese Courts Use the DCFR over National Sources of Law? -- Should the Portuguese Courts Use the DCFR Concept of "Legally Relevant Damage"?.

This book investigates whether national courts could and should import innovative solutions from abroad in the adjudication of complex legal disputes. Special attention is paid to the concept of "legally relevant damage" and its importance in overcoming the deadlock created by the category of "pure economic loss" in the Portuguese and German tort law systems. These systems are essentially based on the concept of unlawfulness ("Rechtswidrigkeit"), which limits the compensation for pure economic loss to where a protective rule is infringed. These losses have nevertheless been compensated for through the extensive interpretation of rules and the appeal to near-contractual devices, which has been detrimental to legal certainty, the equality before the law, and subjects' freedom of action. This book explains why courts can and should take a proactive role and apply DCFR-based solutions in order to compensate for every loss that is worthy of legal protection.

ISBN: 9783319529233

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-52923-3doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

890398
Procedure (Law)
--United States.

LC Class. No.: KF8719

Dewey Class. No.: 347.732

The draft common frame of reference as a "toolbox" for Domestic Courts = a solution to the pure economic loss problem from a comparative perspective /
LDR:03336nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 2105671
003 DE-He213
005 20170703175841.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 180417s2017 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319529233 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319529226 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-52923-3 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-52923-3
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a KF8719
072 7 $a LB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LAW016000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 347.732 $2 23
090 $a KF8719 $b .S237 2017
100 1 $a Santos Silva, Marta. $3 3250784
245 1 4 $a The draft common frame of reference as a "toolbox" for Domestic Courts $h [electronic resource] : $b a solution to the pure economic loss problem from a comparative perspective / $c by Marta Santos Silva.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2017.
300 $a xxxi, 275 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a Part I - The Portuguese Civil Code Through the Prism of the Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR): Portuguese Codified Law and its Broad-minded Attitude Towards Comparative Law and Jurisprudence from a Historical Perspective -- Judges as Key Players in the Development of European Private Law -- A Role for the DCFR in Domestic Adjudication -- Part II - A Plea for the Informal Acceptance of the Concept of "Legally Relevant Damage" as a Way to Break the Stalemate Created by the Category "Pure Economic Losses": General Remarks on the Non-contractual Liability Regime Arising out of Damage Caused to Another in the Portuguese Civil Code -- Drawbacks of Unlawfulness and Compensation of Pure Economic Loss -- General Remarks on the Non-contractual Liability Regime Arising out of Damage Caused to Another in the Draft Common Frame of Reference (PEL. Liab. Dam.) -- Reception of the DCFR's Concept of "Legally Relevant Damage" and its Potential for the Protection of Pure Economic Interests -- Part III - Critical Remarks: Cutting the Gordian Knot with the DCFR: The Deadlock of Pure Economic Loss and the Quest for a Solution -- Could Portuguese Courts Use the DCFR over National Sources of Law? -- Should the Portuguese Courts Use the DCFR Concept of "Legally Relevant Damage"?.
520 $a This book investigates whether national courts could and should import innovative solutions from abroad in the adjudication of complex legal disputes. Special attention is paid to the concept of "legally relevant damage" and its importance in overcoming the deadlock created by the category of "pure economic loss" in the Portuguese and German tort law systems. These systems are essentially based on the concept of unlawfulness ("Rechtswidrigkeit"), which limits the compensation for pure economic loss to where a protective rule is infringed. These losses have nevertheless been compensated for through the extensive interpretation of rules and the appeal to near-contractual devices, which has been detrimental to legal certainty, the equality before the law, and subjects' freedom of action. This book explains why courts can and should take a proactive role and apply DCFR-based solutions in order to compensate for every loss that is worthy of legal protection.
650 0 $a Procedure (Law) $z United States. $3 890398
650 0 $a Courts $x Economic aspects. $3 3250785
650 0 $a Court congestion and delay. $3 3250786
650 0 $a Courts $x Interpretation and construction. $3 3250787
650 1 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 2 4 $a Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law. $3 1566062
650 2 4 $a European Law. $3 1566626
650 2 4 $a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. $3 1565627
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52923-3
950 $a Law and Criminology (Springer-41177)