東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The stimulation impact of homogeneou...

Guo, Jing.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The stimulation impact of homogeneous and heterogeneous visuals on nominal and interactive group brainstorming.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The stimulation impact of homogeneous and heterogeneous visuals on nominal and interactive group brainstorming./
作者:	Guo, Jing.
面頁冊數:	135 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-08A(E).
標題:	Communication. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10036941
ISBN:	9781339546940

The stimulation impact of homogeneous and heterogeneous visuals on nominal and interactive group brainstorming.
Guo, Jing.

The stimulation impact of homogeneous and heterogeneous visuals on nominal and interactive group brainstorming. - 135 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Cornell University, 2016.

The present study provides a theoretical extension of the main propositions of the SIAM model by testing visual stimuli on both nominal and interactive groups. Compared to previous studies, this study provides a more dynamic comparative analysis between nominal and interactive groups under various visual stimulation conditions, building on the existing SIAM model by extending a comparison of two group types (nominal vs. interactive) into a comparison between two sets of visual stimuli (homogeneous vs. heterogeneous) and between two different lab settings (physical or virtual). As expected, all nominal groups in the present study generated more ideas, expressed more idea categories, and had higher inter-category fluency than interactive groups. The SIAM model suggests two strategies to assist brainstormers with generating unconventional ideas: stimulating diverse idea categories to increase the breadth of ideas generated, stimulating relevant homogeneous categories to increase the depth of ideas generated. In general, groups exposed to visual stimuli generated more ideas and produced a greater number of idea categories than groups given no visual stimuli. As hypothesized, groups exposed to task-irrelevant, heterogeneous stimuli generated relatively more idea categories, but task-relevant, homogeneous stimuli did not affect group performance as expected. There was no major difference in inter-category fluency between homogenous and heterogeneous stimulation conditions across nominal and interactive groups.

ISBN: 9781339546940Subjects--Topical Terms:

524709
Communication.

The stimulation impact of homogeneous and heterogeneous visuals on nominal and interactive group brainstorming.
LDR:02411nmm a2200265 4500 001 2078672
005 20161129073837.5
008 170521s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339546940
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10036941
035 $a AAI10036941
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Guo, Jing. $3 2049882
245 1 4 $a The stimulation impact of homogeneous and heterogeneous visuals on nominal and interactive group brainstorming.
300 $a 135 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Poppy McLeod.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Cornell University, 2016.
520 $a The present study provides a theoretical extension of the main propositions of the SIAM model by testing visual stimuli on both nominal and interactive groups. Compared to previous studies, this study provides a more dynamic comparative analysis between nominal and interactive groups under various visual stimulation conditions, building on the existing SIAM model by extending a comparison of two group types (nominal vs. interactive) into a comparison between two sets of visual stimuli (homogeneous vs. heterogeneous) and between two different lab settings (physical or virtual). As expected, all nominal groups in the present study generated more ideas, expressed more idea categories, and had higher inter-category fluency than interactive groups. The SIAM model suggests two strategies to assist brainstormers with generating unconventional ideas: stimulating diverse idea categories to increase the breadth of ideas generated, stimulating relevant homogeneous categories to increase the depth of ideas generated. In general, groups exposed to visual stimuli generated more ideas and produced a greater number of idea categories than groups given no visual stimuli. As hypothesized, groups exposed to task-irrelevant, heterogeneous stimuli generated relatively more idea categories, but task-relevant, homogeneous stimuli did not affect group performance as expected. There was no major difference in inter-category fluency between homogenous and heterogeneous stimulation conditions across nominal and interactive groups.
590 $a School code: 0058.
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
690 $a 0459
710 2 $a Cornell University. $3 530586
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-08A(E).
790 $a 0058
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10036941