東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

TESOL versus SLP techniques for the ...

Li, Yingya.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

TESOL versus SLP techniques for the development of L2 English pronunciation.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	TESOL versus SLP techniques for the development of L2 English pronunciation./
Author:	Li, Yingya.
Description:	114 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International55-01(E).
Subject:	Linguistics. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1599351
ISBN:	9781339059853

TESOL versus SLP techniques for the development of L2 English pronunciation.
Li, Yingya.

TESOL versus SLP techniques for the development of L2 English pronunciation. - 114 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-01.

Thesis (M.A.)--Syracuse University, 2015.

This study investigated the techniques used in Teaching English of Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) and Speech-language Pathology (SLP) fields for the development of English pronunciation. First, a four-week, one-on-one training (one hour twice a week) for three Chinese learners of English as a second language (ESL) was conducted, employing the application of minimal pairs within different approaches -- TESOL and SLP -- to examine their effectiveness on the accuracy of sound production. All together five sounds were targeted (i.e., the velar nasal /eta/, the voiceless interdental fricative /theta/, the voiced labiodental fricative /v/, the voiced labial-velar approximate /w/ and the voiced alveolar liquid /l/). Second, a semi-structured interview was conducted to explore the applications of pronunciation teaching techniques and methods by professionals in each field. A number of areas were explored: practitioners' understanding of pronunciation/speech sound development, their preparedness for pronunciation teaching, and their attitudes towards practitioners in the other field.

ISBN: 9781339059853Subjects--Topical Terms:

524476
Linguistics.

TESOL versus SLP techniques for the development of L2 English pronunciation.
LDR:02871nmm a2200301 4500 001 2078133
005 20161122113929.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339059853
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1599351
035 $a AAI1599351
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Li, Yingya. $3 3193698
245 1 0 $a TESOL versus SLP techniques for the development of L2 English pronunciation.
300 $a 114 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-01.
500 $a Advisers: Amanda Brown; Mary L. Edwards.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Syracuse University, 2015.
520 $a This study investigated the techniques used in Teaching English of Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) and Speech-language Pathology (SLP) fields for the development of English pronunciation. First, a four-week, one-on-one training (one hour twice a week) for three Chinese learners of English as a second language (ESL) was conducted, employing the application of minimal pairs within different approaches -- TESOL and SLP -- to examine their effectiveness on the accuracy of sound production. All together five sounds were targeted (i.e., the velar nasal /eta/, the voiceless interdental fricative /theta/, the voiced labiodental fricative /v/, the voiced labial-velar approximate /w/ and the voiced alveolar liquid /l/). Second, a semi-structured interview was conducted to explore the applications of pronunciation teaching techniques and methods by professionals in each field. A number of areas were explored: practitioners' understanding of pronunciation/speech sound development, their preparedness for pronunciation teaching, and their attitudes towards practitioners in the other field.
520 $a Our findings from the first study suggested that when the technique of minimal pairs was applied within a segment-focused SLP approach, ESL participants were able to achieve higher accuracy in speech of shorter units such as passive task (i.e., tasks with scripts). In contrast, when minimal pairs were incorporated implicitly within a communicative, goal-orientated TESOL approach, ESL speakers were able to achieve better performance in active spontaneous productions (i.e., tasks without scripts). The second study showed that the TESOL professionals interviewed believed that intelligibility was more important than accuracy; while the SLP professionals maintained the incredible importance of accurate pronunciation. Finally, overall, SLP participants expressed stronger confidence in their readiness to teach both L1 and L2 English pronunciation than did TESOL professionals.
590 $a School code: 0659.
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Language. $3 643551
650 4 $a Speech therapy. $3 520446
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0679
690 $a 0460
710 2 $a Syracuse University. $b Languages, Literature, and Linguistics. $3 2100797
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 55-01(E).
790 $a 0659
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1599351