東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Perception of on-premise commercial ...

Beatty, Maleah.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Perception of on-premise commercial sign regulations: A comparison between designers and non-designers.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Perception of on-premise commercial sign regulations: A comparison between designers and non-designers./
作者:	Beatty, Maleah.
面頁冊數:	89 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-04.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International55-04(E).
標題:	Landscape architecture. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10102675
ISBN:	9781339663395

Perception of on-premise commercial sign regulations: A comparison between designers and non-designers.
Beatty, Maleah.

Perception of on-premise commercial sign regulations: A comparison between designers and non-designers. - 89 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-04.

Thesis (M.A.)--Michigan State University, 2016.

Creating an attractive public realm drives the economic, cultural and social development of modern cities (Witter & Crawford, 2013; Pugalis, 2009). Regulation has long since guided urban growth, and it is essential for municipalities today to construct regulation that is conducive to creating visually stimulating public spaces. As an influential aspect of a modern streetscape, commercial signage can contribute to visual pollution if not properly regulated (Crawford, Lee, & Beatty, 2015; Portella, 2014). Little scientific research has been conducted on the impacts of commercial signage and the varying arrangements created by different sign regulations in regards to perception (Jourdan, Hurd, & Hawkins, 2013; Portella, 2014).

ISBN: 9781339663395Subjects--Topical Terms:

541842
Landscape architecture.

Perception of on-premise commercial sign regulations: A comparison between designers and non-designers.
LDR:02584nmm a2200301 4500 001 2076883
005 20161114125216.5
008 170521s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339663395
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10102675
035 $a AAI10102675
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Beatty, Maleah. $3 3192360
245 1 0 $a Perception of on-premise commercial sign regulations: A comparison between designers and non-designers.
300 $a 89 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-04.
500 $a Adviser: Pat L. Crawford.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Michigan State University, 2016.
520 $a Creating an attractive public realm drives the economic, cultural and social development of modern cities (Witter & Crawford, 2013; Pugalis, 2009). Regulation has long since guided urban growth, and it is essential for municipalities today to construct regulation that is conducive to creating visually stimulating public spaces. As an influential aspect of a modern streetscape, commercial signage can contribute to visual pollution if not properly regulated (Crawford, Lee, & Beatty, 2015; Portella, 2014). Little scientific research has been conducted on the impacts of commercial signage and the varying arrangements created by different sign regulations in regards to perception (Jourdan, Hurd, & Hawkins, 2013; Portella, 2014).
520 $a Developing sign codes that reflect the desires of the people is the responsibility of planning and design professionals (Pendlebury & Townshend, 1999; Kaplan & Kaplan, 1989). With the rise of public involvement in planning (Lane, 2006; Sanoff, 2000), it is essential that designers and non-designers can coordinate to develop proper sign controls which contribute to urban growth. This research studies the differences and similarities in perceptions of planning and design professionals and non-designers to aid in the development of future, more positively perceived signage regulation. By using visual models presented in the form of a survey, findings show both similarities and differences between these groups in their assessment of signscapes regarding communication, perceptions of characteristics like beauty, interest and order, an overall preference toward highly structured codes, and a difference in harshness of evaluation.
590 $a School code: 0128.
650 4 $a Landscape architecture. $3 541842
650 4 $a Urban planning. $3 2122922
650 4 $a Design. $3 518875
690 $a 0390
690 $a 0999
690 $a 0389
710 2 $a Michigan State University. $b Environmental Design. $3 2103972
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 55-04(E).
790 $a 0128
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10102675