東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

What will the neighbors say? How dif...

Rosado, Ralph.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

What will the neighbors say? How differences in planning culture yield distinctive outcomes in urban redevelopment: The example of the community benefits agreement trend.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	What will the neighbors say? How differences in planning culture yield distinctive outcomes in urban redevelopment: The example of the community benefits agreement trend./
作者:	Rosado, Ralph.
面頁冊數:	370 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-11A(E).
標題:	Urban planning. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3709547
ISBN:	9781321851786

What will the neighbors say? How differences in planning culture yield distinctive outcomes in urban redevelopment: The example of the community benefits agreement trend.
Rosado, Ralph.

What will the neighbors say? How differences in planning culture yield distinctive outcomes in urban redevelopment: The example of the community benefits agreement trend. - 370 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2015.

Although taxpayer dollars often subsidize economic development projects, they sometimes produce mixed results for existing neighbors. Since 2001, in select localities, civic organizations have assumed the role of negotiator on behalf of local constituencies, espousing the view that economic development efforts should significantly improve residents' lives. Various organizations are entering into community benefits agreements (CBAs) with developers and/or governmental bodies in order to meet community needs. In return, the groups agree to support the projects' requests for governmental approvals and/or subsidies. Yet CBAs continue to emerge in relatively few communities. More importantly, they have taken markedly different forms in different places.

ISBN: 9781321851786Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122922
Urban planning.

What will the neighbors say? How differences in planning culture yield distinctive outcomes in urban redevelopment: The example of the community benefits agreement trend.
LDR:03200nmm a2200301 4500 001 2075619
005 20161024135716.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321851786
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3709547
035 $a AAI3709547
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Rosado, Ralph. $3 3191018
245 1 0 $a What will the neighbors say? How differences in planning culture yield distinctive outcomes in urban redevelopment: The example of the community benefits agreement trend.
300 $a 370 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Eugenie L. Birch.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2015.
520 $a Although taxpayer dollars often subsidize economic development projects, they sometimes produce mixed results for existing neighbors. Since 2001, in select localities, civic organizations have assumed the role of negotiator on behalf of local constituencies, espousing the view that economic development efforts should significantly improve residents' lives. Various organizations are entering into community benefits agreements (CBAs) with developers and/or governmental bodies in order to meet community needs. In return, the groups agree to support the projects' requests for governmental approvals and/or subsidies. Yet CBAs continue to emerge in relatively few communities. More importantly, they have taken markedly different forms in different places.
520 $a This work compares major attempts by civic organizations to secure public benefits as part of real estate development project approval processes in California, New York, Wisconsin, and Florida. By comparing a range of CBAs, this study discerns which state- and local-level factors determine why and when CBAs emerge; which factors best account for the differences among the CBAs and benefits, if any, that result; what the impact of the phenomenon has been, and how it has shaped the field of urban political theory. The study finds: the CBA phenomenon reflect the interplay of a number of market, governmental, and civic factors involved in land-use planning and real estate development; local-level factors are more influential than state-level factors, although both are important; the factor that best accounts for differences among CBAs is the archetypal relationship between civic organizations (and not simply "neighbors" in general) and the officials in whose district the projects are to be sited, while differences in the resulting benefits best reflect local market conditions; CBA campaigns remain relatively niche but appear to be shaping broader municipal policy efforts; and the CBA phenomenon is consistent with previous findings in urban political theory, providing the parties involved with a vehicle for defusing land use-related conflicts and securing both project approvals and community benefits in the process.
590 $a School code: 0175.
650 4 $a Urban planning. $3 2122922
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Economic theory. $3 1556984
690 $a 0999
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0511
710 2 $a University of Pennsylvania. $b City and Regional Planning. $3 3191019
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-11A(E).
790 $a 0175
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3709547