東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis as...

Guinot, Jeffrey.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis as a Mechanism for Assessing the Cost Consequence of a Failure.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Failure Mode and Effects Analysis as a Mechanism for Assessing the Cost Consequence of a Failure./
Author:	Guinot, Jeffrey.
Description:	151 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-04(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-04B(E).
Subject:	Engineering. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3739177
ISBN:	9781339297163

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis as a Mechanism for Assessing the Cost Consequence of a Failure.
Guinot, Jeffrey.

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis as a Mechanism for Assessing the Cost Consequence of a Failure. - 151 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-04(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana State University, 2015.

This study investigated the possibility of including the cost consequence of a failure in the a priori risk assessment methodology known as Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA). This entailed developing a model of the standard costs that are incurred when an electronic control module in an automotive application fails in service. These costs were related to the DFMEA ranking of the level of severity of the failure mode and the probability of its occurrence. A series of Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to establish the average costs expected for each level of severity at each level of occurrence. The results were aggregated using fuzzy utility sets into a 9 point ordinal scale of cost consequence. The criterion validity of this scale was assessed with warranty cost data derived from a case study. It was found that the model slightly underestimated the warranty costs that accrued, but the fit could be improved with adjustments dictated by actual usage conditions.

ISBN: 9781339297163Subjects--Topical Terms:

586835
Engineering.

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis as a Mechanism for Assessing the Cost Consequence of a Failure.
LDR:02494nmm a2200289 4500 001 2074964
005 20161008135108.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339297163
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3739177
035 $a AAI3739177
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Guinot, Jeffrey. $3 3190322
245 1 0 $a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis as a Mechanism for Assessing the Cost Consequence of a Failure.
300 $a 151 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-04(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: John W. Sinn.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana State University, 2015.
520 $a This study investigated the possibility of including the cost consequence of a failure in the a priori risk assessment methodology known as Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA). This entailed developing a model of the standard costs that are incurred when an electronic control module in an automotive application fails in service. These costs were related to the DFMEA ranking of the level of severity of the failure mode and the probability of its occurrence. A series of Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to establish the average costs expected for each level of severity at each level of occurrence. The results were aggregated using fuzzy utility sets into a 9 point ordinal scale of cost consequence. The criterion validity of this scale was assessed with warranty cost data derived from a case study. It was found that the model slightly underestimated the warranty costs that accrued, but the fit could be improved with adjustments dictated by actual usage conditions.
520 $a The problems with the risk prioritization system of FMEA, referred to as RPN, were discussed and citations of literature on possible corrections to this system were presented. An attempt was made to compare the tendency of RPN to produce Pareto Optimality violations with a parallel system of risk prioritization involving cost. It was found that the "Cost Priority Number" had a lower likelihood of producing optimality violations than did RPN. However, this is not heralded as a major advantage as "CPN" is not put forth as a method of prioritizing financial risks inherent in a design or process.
590 $a School code: 0094.
650 4 $a Engineering. $3 586835
650 4 $a Automotive engineering. $3 2181195
690 $a 0537
690 $a 0540
710 2 $a Indiana State University. $b Technology Management. $3 1680706
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-04B(E).
790 $a 0094
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3739177