東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Assessing Metadata Quality and Termi...

Marc, David Terrence.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Assessing Metadata Quality and Terminology Coverage of a Federally Sponsored Health Data Repository.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Assessing Metadata Quality and Terminology Coverage of a Federally Sponsored Health Data Repository./
作者:	Marc, David Terrence.
面頁冊數:	142 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-08(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-08B(E).
標題:	Health care management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10076337
ISBN:	9781339586380

Assessing Metadata Quality and Terminology Coverage of a Federally Sponsored Health Data Repository.
Marc, David Terrence.

Assessing Metadata Quality and Terminology Coverage of a Federally Sponsored Health Data Repository. - 142 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-08(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2016.

The Open Government Initiative began an era of information sharing by publishing data that is accessible to the public. HealthData.gov is a data portal that was developed by the U.S. Federal Government to publish metadata to disseminate information about healthcare datasets to the American people. Despite the growth in the number of datasets published, there has been limited public participation in the use of the data, which has been attributed to the currently implemented methods for data storage and retrieval. An automated assessment of the HealthData.gov metadata was conducted to assess completeness, accuracy, and consistency of metadata published from 2012 to 2014. Also, a method for indexing the datasets using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) was evaluated using a term coverage study. The results of these studies demonstrated that metadata published in earlier years were less complete, lower quality, and less consistent. Also, metadata that underwent modifications following their original creation were of higher quality. MeSH offered adequate coverage of the metadata concepts, thereby lending support for the adoption of the terminology for indexing purposes. The results suggested that greater standardization is needed when publishing metadata. This research contributed to the development of automated metrics for assessing metadata quality, design recommendations for a framework to supports high quality metadata, and recommendations for expanding MeSH to offer greater coverage of concepts from HealthData.gov.

ISBN: 9781339586380Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122906
Health care management.

Assessing Metadata Quality and Terminology Coverage of a Federally Sponsored Health Data Repository.
LDR:02447nmm a2200277 4500 001 2073403
005 20160915132525.5
008 170521s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339586380
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10076337
035 $a AAI10076337
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Marc, David Terrence. $3 3188643
245 1 0 $a Assessing Metadata Quality and Terminology Coverage of a Federally Sponsored Health Data Repository.
300 $a 142 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-08(E), Section: B.
500 $a Advisers: Lael Gatewood; Rui Zhang.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2016.
520 $a The Open Government Initiative began an era of information sharing by publishing data that is accessible to the public. HealthData.gov is a data portal that was developed by the U.S. Federal Government to publish metadata to disseminate information about healthcare datasets to the American people. Despite the growth in the number of datasets published, there has been limited public participation in the use of the data, which has been attributed to the currently implemented methods for data storage and retrieval. An automated assessment of the HealthData.gov metadata was conducted to assess completeness, accuracy, and consistency of metadata published from 2012 to 2014. Also, a method for indexing the datasets using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) was evaluated using a term coverage study. The results of these studies demonstrated that metadata published in earlier years were less complete, lower quality, and less consistent. Also, metadata that underwent modifications following their original creation were of higher quality. MeSH offered adequate coverage of the metadata concepts, thereby lending support for the adoption of the terminology for indexing purposes. The results suggested that greater standardization is needed when publishing metadata. This research contributed to the development of automated metrics for assessing metadata quality, design recommendations for a framework to supports high quality metadata, and recommendations for expanding MeSH to offer greater coverage of concepts from HealthData.gov.
590 $a School code: 0130.
650 4 $a Health care management. $3 2122906
650 4 $a Library science. $3 539284
690 $a 0769
690 $a 0399
710 2 $a University of Minnesota. $b Health Informatics. $3 1266007
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-08B(E).
790 $a 0130
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10076337