東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Effects of regulated deficit irrigat...

Wieber, Emily Nguyen.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on fruit yield, quality, and physiology of Washington navel orange trees.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on fruit yield, quality, and physiology of Washington navel orange trees./
作者:	Wieber, Emily Nguyen.
面頁冊數:	100 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-02.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International55-02(E).
標題:	Biology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1604569
ISBN:	9781339279985

Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on fruit yield, quality, and physiology of Washington navel orange trees.
Wieber, Emily Nguyen.

Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on fruit yield, quality, and physiology of Washington navel orange trees. - 100 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-02.

Thesis (M.S.)--California State University, Fullerton, 2016.

The purpose of this study was 1) to measure fruit yield of navel orange trees and the plants' physiological responses to regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) and 2) to determine if plant-based measures, including stem water potentials (?stem), sap flow (SF), and daily trunk diameter fluctuations (TDF) could be easily used to indicate citrus water need using minimal instruments. The study was conducted in 2014/15 at the Citrus Experiment Station at the University of California, Riverside, and consisted of one control and three deficit irrigation treatments. Control trees were irrigated to replace 100% of water lost due to crop evapotranspiration (ETc). During the early fruit growth period (mid-May to mid-July), RDI1 and RDI3 trees were subjected to 25% of ETc. During fruit maturity period (mid-October to mid-December), RDI2 and RDI3 trees were subjected to 75% of ETc. At all other times, irrigation was 100% of ETc. All RDI treatments resulted in lower yield and higher percentage of small oranges than the control, but the yield effects were only significant for RDI1 and the size effect only for RDI1 and RDI3. Total water savings were 19% for RDI1, 2% for RDI2, and 21% for RDI3. Considering the benefits of water savings and the potential loss/gain in gross revenues, RDI3 and RDI2 were better irrigation strategies than RDI1. Of the plant-based parameters, the labor-intensive discontinuous ?stem had the highest signal intensity for water stress, while the continuous measurements using plant sensors failed to detect water stress consistently.

ISBN: 9781339279985Subjects--Topical Terms:

522710
Biology.

Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on fruit yield, quality, and physiology of Washington navel orange trees.
LDR:02479nmm a2200289 4500 001 2072546
005 20160808080953.5
008 170521s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339279985
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1604569
035 $a AAI1604569
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Wieber, Emily Nguyen. $3 3187739
245 1 0 $a Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on fruit yield, quality, and physiology of Washington navel orange trees.
300 $a 100 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-02.
500 $a Adviser: H. Jochen Schenk.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--California State University, Fullerton, 2016.
520 $a The purpose of this study was 1) to measure fruit yield of navel orange trees and the plants' physiological responses to regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) and 2) to determine if plant-based measures, including stem water potentials (?stem), sap flow (SF), and daily trunk diameter fluctuations (TDF) could be easily used to indicate citrus water need using minimal instruments. The study was conducted in 2014/15 at the Citrus Experiment Station at the University of California, Riverside, and consisted of one control and three deficit irrigation treatments. Control trees were irrigated to replace 100% of water lost due to crop evapotranspiration (ETc). During the early fruit growth period (mid-May to mid-July), RDI1 and RDI3 trees were subjected to 25% of ETc. During fruit maturity period (mid-October to mid-December), RDI2 and RDI3 trees were subjected to 75% of ETc. At all other times, irrigation was 100% of ETc. All RDI treatments resulted in lower yield and higher percentage of small oranges than the control, but the yield effects were only significant for RDI1 and the size effect only for RDI1 and RDI3. Total water savings were 19% for RDI1, 2% for RDI2, and 21% for RDI3. Considering the benefits of water savings and the potential loss/gain in gross revenues, RDI3 and RDI2 were better irrigation strategies than RDI1. Of the plant-based parameters, the labor-intensive discontinuous ?stem had the highest signal intensity for water stress, while the continuous measurements using plant sensors failed to detect water stress consistently.
590 $a School code: 6060.
650 4 $a Biology. $3 522710
650 4 $a Horticulture. $3 555447
650 4 $a Plant sciences. $3 3173832
690 $a 0306
690 $a 0471
690 $a 0479
710 2 $a California State University, Fullerton. $b Biology. $3 3187740
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 55-02(E).
790 $a 6060
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1604569