東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Word Order and Information Structure...

Jones, Andrew R.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Word Order and Information Structure in Finite Verb Clauses in Hellenistic Period Hebrew.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Word Order and Information Structure in Finite Verb Clauses in Hellenistic Period Hebrew./
作者:	Jones, Andrew R.
面頁冊數:	478 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-06(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-06A(E).
標題:	Ancient languages. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3746320
ISBN:	9781339396262

Word Order and Information Structure in Finite Verb Clauses in Hellenistic Period Hebrew.
Jones, Andrew R.

Word Order and Information Structure in Finite Verb Clauses in Hellenistic Period Hebrew. - 478 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-06(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2015.

This study investigates the relationship between word order and information structure in finite verb clauses in three ancient Hebrew texts from among the Dead Sea Scrolls---the Community Rule, the War Rule, and the Habakkuk Pesher. An excursus provides a separate treatment of Daniel 8--12. The theoretical linguistic foundations of the study are rooted in generative linguistics, especially the work of J. Uriagereka and N. Erteschik-Shir. The Early Immediate Constituent Theory of J. Hawkins also plays an important role. The emphasis is on syntactic structures where word order is flexible in order to investigate the effect of variation on information structure. The basic word order of subject and verb is indeterminate, and therefore it is not possible to know whether SV or VS order is marked (although the tendencies of each order are nonetheless clear). However, it is simple to determine that the basic word order of verb and object is VO. Deviations from the basic VO order can be explained using three structures: left-dislocation of a shift topic; fronting of a Topic (whether a shift topic, contrastive constituent, or restrictive constituent); and fronting of a non-Topic (whether a cleft constituent or a constituent that opens the clause-final attentive focus position for a different constituent). The largest clause-level constituent is normally placed in clause-final position in order to satisfy the EICT.

ISBN: 9781339396262Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122823
Ancient languages.

Word Order and Information Structure in Finite Verb Clauses in Hellenistic Period Hebrew.
LDR:02344nmm a2200289 4500 001 2070573
005 20160603135407.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339396262
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3746320
035 $a AAI3746320
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Jones, Andrew R. $3 3185630
245 1 0 $a Word Order and Information Structure in Finite Verb Clauses in Hellenistic Period Hebrew.
300 $a 478 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-06(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Robert D. Holmstedt.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2015.
520 $a This study investigates the relationship between word order and information structure in finite verb clauses in three ancient Hebrew texts from among the Dead Sea Scrolls---the Community Rule, the War Rule, and the Habakkuk Pesher. An excursus provides a separate treatment of Daniel 8--12. The theoretical linguistic foundations of the study are rooted in generative linguistics, especially the work of J. Uriagereka and N. Erteschik-Shir. The Early Immediate Constituent Theory of J. Hawkins also plays an important role. The emphasis is on syntactic structures where word order is flexible in order to investigate the effect of variation on information structure. The basic word order of subject and verb is indeterminate, and therefore it is not possible to know whether SV or VS order is marked (although the tendencies of each order are nonetheless clear). However, it is simple to determine that the basic word order of verb and object is VO. Deviations from the basic VO order can be explained using three structures: left-dislocation of a shift topic; fronting of a Topic (whether a shift topic, contrastive constituent, or restrictive constituent); and fronting of a non-Topic (whether a cleft constituent or a constituent that opens the clause-final attentive focus position for a different constituent). The largest clause-level constituent is normally placed in clause-final position in order to satisfy the EICT.
590 $a School code: 0779.
650 4 $a Ancient languages. $3 2122823
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Judaic studies. $3 2144743
690 $a 0289
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0751
710 2 $a University of Toronto (Canada). $b Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations. $3 3185631
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-06A(E).
790 $a 0779
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3746320