東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Universal Design for Learning as a f...

Venkatesh, Kavita.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Universal Design for Learning as a framework for social justice: A multi-case analysis of undergraduate pre-service teachers.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Universal Design for Learning as a framework for social justice: A multi-case analysis of undergraduate pre-service teachers./
作者:	Venkatesh, Kavita.
面頁冊數:	215 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-09A(E).
標題:	Teacher education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3689535
ISBN:	9781321690026

Universal Design for Learning as a framework for social justice: A multi-case analysis of undergraduate pre-service teachers.
Venkatesh, Kavita.

Universal Design for Learning as a framework for social justice: A multi-case analysis of undergraduate pre-service teachers. - 215 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston College, 2015.

The diversity of the student population in K--12 settings has steadily increased over the past few decades. While students who are of a racial/ethnic minority background have increased (Villegas & Lucas, 2007), teachers are increasingly young, female, and white (Goldenberg, 2008; NCES, 2013). In acknowledging these demographic discrepancies between teachers and students, many studies and reports have put forward an array of frameworks that teachers can employ in their practice to address diversity. Among these frameworks are Teaching for Social Justice (TSJ) and Universal Design for Learning (UDL). This dissertation seeks to examine the potential relationship among the two frameworks as viewed by undergraduate teacher candidates as they develop their dispositions for teaching diverse learners through a 17-week course attached to a one-day-per-week pre-practicum experience.

ISBN: 9781321690026Subjects--Topical Terms:

3172312
Teacher education.

Universal Design for Learning as a framework for social justice: A multi-case analysis of undergraduate pre-service teachers.
LDR:03134nmm a2200301 4500 001 2068500
005 20160422121605.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321690026
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3689535
035 $a AAI3689535
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Venkatesh, Kavita. $3 3183447
245 1 0 $a Universal Design for Learning as a framework for social justice: A multi-case analysis of undergraduate pre-service teachers.
300 $a 215 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Richard M. Jackson.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston College, 2015.
520 $a The diversity of the student population in K--12 settings has steadily increased over the past few decades. While students who are of a racial/ethnic minority background have increased (Villegas & Lucas, 2007), teachers are increasingly young, female, and white (Goldenberg, 2008; NCES, 2013). In acknowledging these demographic discrepancies between teachers and students, many studies and reports have put forward an array of frameworks that teachers can employ in their practice to address diversity. Among these frameworks are Teaching for Social Justice (TSJ) and Universal Design for Learning (UDL). This dissertation seeks to examine the potential relationship among the two frameworks as viewed by undergraduate teacher candidates as they develop their dispositions for teaching diverse learners through a 17-week course attached to a one-day-per-week pre-practicum experience.
520 $a This multi-case study examined how the beliefs of 19 participants regarding TSJ and UDL changed over the course of a 6-month study within the context of a course. This study investigated how these participants connected UDL and social justice as a cohesive framework for addressing diversity in the classroom. Using daily and weekly journals, online discussion forums, and pre- and post- surveys, this study analyzed all 19 participants to identify four representative cases.
520 $a Findings from this study reveal that most participants were impacted by the course to the extent that they were able to identify the importance of aspects of social justice in the practice of an educator. Fewer participants were able to identify the role of UDL in the classroom. Only one participant viewed social justice and UDL as a cohesive framework for impacting classroom practice. Analysis of the representative case studies suggests that participants at this level of development may need more time to engage in complicated abstract concepts. They may also need course-attached field placements in classrooms that align with the mission and vision of the preparation program, consistency in messaging through the duration of a preparation program, and differentiated supports based on their background experiences.
590 $a School code: 0016.
650 4 $a Teacher education. $3 3172312
650 4 $a Multicultural Education. $3 2122919
690 $a 0530
690 $a 0455
710 2 $a Boston College. $b LSOE - Teacher Education, Special Education, Curriculum and Instruction. $3 2098859
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-09A(E).
790 $a 0016
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3689535