東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Whom to follow - crowds vs. experts ...

Lei, Yu.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Whom to follow - crowds vs. experts vs. friends: An exploratory study of decision making on crowdfunding websites.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Whom to follow - crowds vs. experts vs. friends: An exploratory study of decision making on crowdfunding websites./
作者:	Lei, Yu.
面頁冊數:	121 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-03A(E).
標題:	Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3728162
ISBN:	9781339135243

Whom to follow - crowds vs. experts vs. friends: An exploratory study of decision making on crowdfunding websites.
Lei, Yu.

Whom to follow - crowds vs. experts vs. friends: An exploratory study of decision making on crowdfunding websites. - 121 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Binghamton, 2015.

As a new form of fund raising method, crowdfunding has attained widespread popularity and attention in recent years. Crowdfunding aims at distributed audiences over the Internet so there are higher chances for new entrepreneurs and wide range of products to be funded. However, as the literature shows, investment activities in crowdfunding are mostly based on herding behavior. One potential explanation is the high level of project uncertainty as investors have very limited information on project initiators and their products. However, this herding behavior creates negative externalities as many fully funded projects fail to finish their promised products successfully. In this study, I argue that crowds provide mixed information and other reference groups such as friends and experts provide more specific information, which is more effective in decision making. Overall, based on rational choice theory and social comparison theory, I am investigating the decision making process of individuals in the crowdfunding context. More specifically, I examine whether funders follow crowds, friends or experts when they make investment decisions on crowdfunding websites and how their choice of reference group changes with different types and levels of project uncertainty and product complexity. The findings of the study is expected to contribute to the literature as I investigate the fit between the type of information that a reference group provides and the type of information needed by the decision maker, analyze the interrelation between seller and product uncertainty, and compare effects of different levels of project complexity on pledging behaviors. Based on the results, I argue that effective decision making in crowdfunding will be beneficial for the crowdfunding platform, project initiator, and the investor, and thus the findings would have significant practical implications as well.

ISBN: 9781339135243Subjects--Topical Terms:

516664
Management.

Whom to follow - crowds vs. experts vs. friends: An exploratory study of decision making on crowdfunding websites.
LDR:02856nmm a2200289 4500 001 2067929
005 20160418082954.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339135243
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3728162
035 $a AAI3728162
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Lei, Yu. $3 1910167
245 1 0 $a Whom to follow - crowds vs. experts vs. friends: An exploratory study of decision making on crowdfunding websites.
300 $a 121 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Ali A. Yayla.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Binghamton, 2015.
520 $a As a new form of fund raising method, crowdfunding has attained widespread popularity and attention in recent years. Crowdfunding aims at distributed audiences over the Internet so there are higher chances for new entrepreneurs and wide range of products to be funded. However, as the literature shows, investment activities in crowdfunding are mostly based on herding behavior. One potential explanation is the high level of project uncertainty as investors have very limited information on project initiators and their products. However, this herding behavior creates negative externalities as many fully funded projects fail to finish their promised products successfully. In this study, I argue that crowds provide mixed information and other reference groups such as friends and experts provide more specific information, which is more effective in decision making. Overall, based on rational choice theory and social comparison theory, I am investigating the decision making process of individuals in the crowdfunding context. More specifically, I examine whether funders follow crowds, friends or experts when they make investment decisions on crowdfunding websites and how their choice of reference group changes with different types and levels of project uncertainty and product complexity. The findings of the study is expected to contribute to the literature as I investigate the fit between the type of information that a reference group provides and the type of information needed by the decision maker, analyze the interrelation between seller and product uncertainty, and compare effects of different levels of project complexity on pledging behaviors. Based on the results, I argue that effective decision making in crowdfunding will be beneficial for the crowdfunding platform, project initiator, and the investor, and thus the findings would have significant practical implications as well.
590 $a School code: 0792.
650 4 $a Management. $3 516664
650 4 $a Information technology. $3 532993
650 4 $a Marketing. $3 536353
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0489
690 $a 0338
710 2 $a State University of New York at Binghamton. $b Management. $3 3172246
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-03A(E).
790 $a 0792
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3728162