語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Analysis of Light Emitting Diode Tec...
~
Treichel, Todd H.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Analysis of Light Emitting Diode Technology for Aerospace Suitability in Human Space Flight Applications.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Analysis of Light Emitting Diode Technology for Aerospace Suitability in Human Space Flight Applications./
作者:
Treichel, Todd H.
面頁冊數:
176 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International77-03B(E).
標題:
Aerospace engineering. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3731401
ISBN:
9781339177939
Analysis of Light Emitting Diode Technology for Aerospace Suitability in Human Space Flight Applications.
Treichel, Todd H.
Analysis of Light Emitting Diode Technology for Aerospace Suitability in Human Space Flight Applications.
- 176 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: B.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northcentral University, 2015.
Commercial space designers are required to manage space flight designs in accordance with parts selections made from qualified parts listings approved by Department of Defense and NASA agencies for reliability and safety. The research problem was a government and private aerospace industry problem involving how LEDs cannot replace existing fluorescent lighting in manned space flight vehicles until such technology meets DOD and NASA requirements for reliability and safety, and effects on astronaut cognition and health. The purpose of this quantitative experimental study was to determine to what extent commercial LEDs can suitably meet NASA requirements for manufacturer reliability, color reliability, robustness to environmental test requirements, and degradation effects from operational power, while providing comfortable ambient light free of eyestrain to astronauts in lieu of current fluorescent lighting. A fractional factorial experiment tested white and blue LEDs for NASA required space flight environmental stress testing and applied operating current. The second phase of the study used a randomized block design, to test human factor effects of LEDs and a qualified ISS fluorescent for retinal fatigue and eye strain. Eighteen human subjects were recruited from university student members of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Findings for Phase 1 testing showed that commercial LEDs met all DOD and NASA requirements for manufacturer reliability, color reliability, robustness to environmental requirements, and degradation effects from operational power. Findings showed statistical significance for LED color and operational power variables but degraded light output levels did not fall below the industry recognized <70%. Findings from Phase 2 human factors testing showed no statistically significant evidence that the NASA approved ISS fluorescent lights or blue or white LEDs caused fatigue, eye strain and/or headache, when study participants perform detailed tasks of reading and assembling mechanical parts for an extended period of two uninterrupted hours. However, human subjects self-reported that blue LEDs provided the most white light and the favored light source over the white LED and the ISS fluorescent as a sole artificial light source for space travel. According to NASA standards, findings from this study indicate that LEDs meet criteria for the NASA TRL 7 rating, as study findings showed that commercial LED manufacturers passed the rigorous testing standards of suitability for space flight environments and human factor effects. Recommendations for future research include further testing for space flight using the basis of this study for replication, but reduce study limitations by 1) testing human subjects exposure to LEDs in a simulated space capsule environment over several days, and 2) installing and testing LEDs in space modules being tested for human spaceflight.
ISBN: 9781339177939Subjects--Topical Terms:
1002622
Aerospace engineering.
Analysis of Light Emitting Diode Technology for Aerospace Suitability in Human Space Flight Applications.
LDR
:03875nmm a2200289 4500
001
2067520
005
20160411144745.5
008
170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781339177939
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI3731401
035
$a
AAI3731401
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Treichel, Todd H.
$3
3182371
245
1 0
$a
Analysis of Light Emitting Diode Technology for Aerospace Suitability in Human Space Flight Applications.
300
$a
176 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: B.
500
$a
Adviser: Cynthia Akagi.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northcentral University, 2015.
520
$a
Commercial space designers are required to manage space flight designs in accordance with parts selections made from qualified parts listings approved by Department of Defense and NASA agencies for reliability and safety. The research problem was a government and private aerospace industry problem involving how LEDs cannot replace existing fluorescent lighting in manned space flight vehicles until such technology meets DOD and NASA requirements for reliability and safety, and effects on astronaut cognition and health. The purpose of this quantitative experimental study was to determine to what extent commercial LEDs can suitably meet NASA requirements for manufacturer reliability, color reliability, robustness to environmental test requirements, and degradation effects from operational power, while providing comfortable ambient light free of eyestrain to astronauts in lieu of current fluorescent lighting. A fractional factorial experiment tested white and blue LEDs for NASA required space flight environmental stress testing and applied operating current. The second phase of the study used a randomized block design, to test human factor effects of LEDs and a qualified ISS fluorescent for retinal fatigue and eye strain. Eighteen human subjects were recruited from university student members of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Findings for Phase 1 testing showed that commercial LEDs met all DOD and NASA requirements for manufacturer reliability, color reliability, robustness to environmental requirements, and degradation effects from operational power. Findings showed statistical significance for LED color and operational power variables but degraded light output levels did not fall below the industry recognized <70%. Findings from Phase 2 human factors testing showed no statistically significant evidence that the NASA approved ISS fluorescent lights or blue or white LEDs caused fatigue, eye strain and/or headache, when study participants perform detailed tasks of reading and assembling mechanical parts for an extended period of two uninterrupted hours. However, human subjects self-reported that blue LEDs provided the most white light and the favored light source over the white LED and the ISS fluorescent as a sole artificial light source for space travel. According to NASA standards, findings from this study indicate that LEDs meet criteria for the NASA TRL 7 rating, as study findings showed that commercial LED manufacturers passed the rigorous testing standards of suitability for space flight environments and human factor effects. Recommendations for future research include further testing for space flight using the basis of this study for replication, but reduce study limitations by 1) testing human subjects exposure to LEDs in a simulated space capsule environment over several days, and 2) installing and testing LEDs in space modules being tested for human spaceflight.
590
$a
School code: 1443.
650
4
$a
Aerospace engineering.
$3
1002622
650
4
$a
Systems science.
$3
3168411
650
4
$a
Mechanical engineering.
$3
649730
690
$a
0538
690
$a
0790
690
$a
0548
710
2
$a
Northcentral University.
$b
School of Business and Technology Management.
$3
2099493
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
77-03B(E).
790
$a
1443
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2015
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3731401
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9300388
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入