東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Writing program administration and t...

Sheffield, Jenna Pack.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Writing program administration and technology: Toward a critical digital literacy in programmatic contexts.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Writing program administration and technology: Toward a critical digital literacy in programmatic contexts./
作者:	Sheffield, Jenna Pack.
面頁冊數:	266 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-09A(E).
標題:	Rhetoric. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3701608
ISBN:	9781321724097

Writing program administration and technology: Toward a critical digital literacy in programmatic contexts.
Sheffield, Jenna Pack.

Writing program administration and technology: Toward a critical digital literacy in programmatic contexts. - 266 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2015.

Grounded in computers and composition scholarship, this mixed-methods dissertation project investigates how digital literacy is being represented and instantiated across U.S. writing programs. Using critical theories of technology as my theoretical framework, I draw on three large data sets, including a national survey of 70 Writing Program Administrators (WPAs) concerning programmatic commitments to digital literacy, a multimodal critical discourse analysis of these programs' websites, and follow-up interviews with survey respondents. Based on my analysis of these data sets, I argue that the focus of most programmatic discourses and practices tends to construct digital literacy in terms of how technological tools can be employed to meet rhetorical outcomes. I maintain, however, that with writing programs as a central force in the renegotiation of digital literacies, WPAs are in a unique position, through discourses and practices, to rearticulate digital literacy as not just a skill or means to improving rhetorical awareness for print composing but also an analytic to examine the social, political, and educational forces undergirding electronic texts and technologies---making visible the social relations involved in technology implementation and encouraging examinations of how technologies affect composing processes. This critical approach positions students as not just consumers but producers of new media who are able to become active agents of change in technological environments. Discussing the challenges that come along with taking a critical approach to technology integration at the programmatic level, I suggest a framework for addressing these challenges---including localizing technologies, mapping local practices to national goals, employing a multiliteracies training model, foregrounding assessment, and fostering communities of practice around digital literacy.

ISBN: 9781321724097Subjects--Topical Terms:

516647
Rhetoric.

Writing program administration and technology: Toward a critical digital literacy in programmatic contexts.
LDR:02829nmm a2200289 4500 001 2067387
005 20160325105923.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321724097
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3701608
035 $a AAI3701608
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Sheffield, Jenna Pack. $3 3182233
245 1 0 $a Writing program administration and technology: Toward a critical digital literacy in programmatic contexts.
300 $a 266 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Amy C. Kimme Hea.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2015.
520 $a Grounded in computers and composition scholarship, this mixed-methods dissertation project investigates how digital literacy is being represented and instantiated across U.S. writing programs. Using critical theories of technology as my theoretical framework, I draw on three large data sets, including a national survey of 70 Writing Program Administrators (WPAs) concerning programmatic commitments to digital literacy, a multimodal critical discourse analysis of these programs' websites, and follow-up interviews with survey respondents. Based on my analysis of these data sets, I argue that the focus of most programmatic discourses and practices tends to construct digital literacy in terms of how technological tools can be employed to meet rhetorical outcomes. I maintain, however, that with writing programs as a central force in the renegotiation of digital literacies, WPAs are in a unique position, through discourses and practices, to rearticulate digital literacy as not just a skill or means to improving rhetorical awareness for print composing but also an analytic to examine the social, political, and educational forces undergirding electronic texts and technologies---making visible the social relations involved in technology implementation and encouraging examinations of how technologies affect composing processes. This critical approach positions students as not just consumers but producers of new media who are able to become active agents of change in technological environments. Discussing the challenges that come along with taking a critical approach to technology integration at the programmatic level, I suggest a framework for addressing these challenges---including localizing technologies, mapping local practices to national goals, employing a multiliteracies training model, foregrounding assessment, and fostering communities of practice around digital literacy.
590 $a School code: 0009.
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 516647
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Language arts. $3 532624
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0279
710 2 $a The University of Arizona. $b English. $3 1022029
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-09A(E).
790 $a 0009
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3701608