東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A Causal Comparative Study of Tutori...

BoNey, Dwight, Jr.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Causal Comparative Study of Tutoring and Learning Outcomes in Reading for Adult Males in Corrections Education.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Causal Comparative Study of Tutoring and Learning Outcomes in Reading for Adult Males in Corrections Education./
作者:	BoNey, Dwight, Jr.
面頁冊數:	118 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-10A(E).
標題:	Adult education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3706040
ISBN:	9781321794762

A Causal Comparative Study of Tutoring and Learning Outcomes in Reading for Adult Males in Corrections Education.
BoNey, Dwight, Jr.

A Causal Comparative Study of Tutoring and Learning Outcomes in Reading for Adult Males in Corrections Education. - 118 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Northcentral University, 2015.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The literacy crisis of the incarcerated in correctional settings has occurred because many inmates have never attained a clear pathway to earn a GED/high school diploma; yet, tutoring has been found as an impactful way to increase reading ability of inmate students. The purpose of this quantitative causal comparative study was to evaluate the impact of the Private Boarding School's (PBS) tutoring program on incarcerated adult basic education (ABE) students. A purposive sample of 33 archival student records of TABE reading scores were gathered and assessed with an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to determine differences between scores for correctional ABE students after 60 hours of instruction for those who participated in a PBS tutoring program and those who had no tutoring preparation. The ANCOVA resulted in no statistically significant differences in posttest reading TABE scores between PBS (e.g., the control group) and non-PBS (e.g., the intervention group) students and the null hypothesis could not be rejected; however, a significant difference was found in the pretest TABE reading scores between groups prior to tutoring that served as the study covariate (p = .01). There are three recommendations for professional practice included: (a) consistent tutoring practices as supported by Brown and Rios (2014), (b) provide specific training for correctional tutors (Sabatini et al., 2011), and (c) assessment of tutor effectiveness (Allen et al., 2014; Sabatini et al., 2011). Recommendations for future research included: (a) utilizing a quantitative non-experimental cross-sectional design could display clearer findings, and (b) qualitative exploratory case study using open-ended questions to assess the tutees perceptions of education prior to the pretest.

ISBN: 9781321794762Subjects--Topical Terms:

543202
Adult education.

A Causal Comparative Study of Tutoring and Learning Outcomes in Reading for Adult Males in Corrections Education.
LDR:02779nmm a2200301 4500 001 2066534
005 20151106144913.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321794762
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3706040
035 $a AAI3706040
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a BoNey, Dwight, Jr. $3 3181353
245 1 2 $a A Causal Comparative Study of Tutoring and Learning Outcomes in Reading for Adult Males in Corrections Education.
300 $a 118 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Robin Throne.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Northcentral University, 2015.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The literacy crisis of the incarcerated in correctional settings has occurred because many inmates have never attained a clear pathway to earn a GED/high school diploma; yet, tutoring has been found as an impactful way to increase reading ability of inmate students. The purpose of this quantitative causal comparative study was to evaluate the impact of the Private Boarding School's (PBS) tutoring program on incarcerated adult basic education (ABE) students. A purposive sample of 33 archival student records of TABE reading scores were gathered and assessed with an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to determine differences between scores for correctional ABE students after 60 hours of instruction for those who participated in a PBS tutoring program and those who had no tutoring preparation. The ANCOVA resulted in no statistically significant differences in posttest reading TABE scores between PBS (e.g., the control group) and non-PBS (e.g., the intervention group) students and the null hypothesis could not be rejected; however, a significant difference was found in the pretest TABE reading scores between groups prior to tutoring that served as the study covariate (p = .01). There are three recommendations for professional practice included: (a) consistent tutoring practices as supported by Brown and Rios (2014), (b) provide specific training for correctional tutors (Sabatini et al., 2011), and (c) assessment of tutor effectiveness (Allen et al., 2014; Sabatini et al., 2011). Recommendations for future research included: (a) utilizing a quantitative non-experimental cross-sectional design could display clearer findings, and (b) qualitative exploratory case study using open-ended questions to assess the tutees perceptions of education prior to the pretest.
590 $a School code: 1443.
650 4 $a Adult education. $3 543202
650 4 $a Educational evaluation. $3 526425
650 4 $a Educational leadership. $3 529436
690 $a 0516
690 $a 0443
690 $a 0449
710 2 $a Northcentral University. $b Education. $3 2049771
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-10A(E).
790 $a 1443
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3706040