東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Hegel's critique of Kant's standpoin...

Addison, Daniel Stephen.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Hegel's critique of Kant's standpoint of finitude.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Hegel's critique of Kant's standpoint of finitude./
Author:	Addison, Daniel Stephen.
Description:	149 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-03(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-03A(E).
Subject:	Metaphysics. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3576988
ISBN:	9781303590245

Hegel's critique of Kant's standpoint of finitude.
Addison, Daniel Stephen.

Hegel's critique of Kant's standpoint of finitude. - 149 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pittsburgh, 2013.

My central aims here are (1) to explicate and defend the claim made by Hegel and other post-Kantians that there is a contradiction at the heart of Kant's theoretical philosophy, and (2) to provide insight into the nature of Hegel's system by seeing how it is formed in response to this real problem in Kant. Kant is committed to a real contradiction, I claim, with his appeal to affection by the thing in itself. This appeal amounts to the claim that our reception of empirical content is unconditioned by the understanding's activity. The claim that contradicts this emerges in Kant's clearest explanation of how the categories make experience possible. We can see that they do so, he argues, by seeing that our reception of empirical content is conditioned by the understanding's activity. Kant's followers J.S. Beck and Fichte champion Kant's latter thought. I claim that their readings are true of Kant's best thought, even though Kant rejects them. He only rejects their interpretations because he cannot abandon the former thought. But Beck and Fichte see, as Kant does not, that a commitment to thing-in-itself affection in light of Kant's explanation of how the categories make experience possible would constitute what Hegel later calls "a self-contradictory ambiguity." Hegel's critique of Kant's "standpoint of finitude" diagnoses why Kant is led to affirm both of these incompatible thoughts. The philosophical motivation behind the shape Hegel's system takes comes to light through an examination of this diagnosis.

ISBN: 9781303590245Subjects--Topical Terms:

517082
Metaphysics.

Hegel's critique of Kant's standpoint of finitude.
LDR:02398nmm a2200289 4500 001 2064093
005 20151109121418.5
008 170521s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303590245
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3576988
035 $a AAI3576988
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Addison, Daniel Stephen. $3 3178650
245 1 0 $a Hegel's critique of Kant's standpoint of finitude.
300 $a 149 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Stephen Engstrom.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pittsburgh, 2013.
520 $a My central aims here are (1) to explicate and defend the claim made by Hegel and other post-Kantians that there is a contradiction at the heart of Kant's theoretical philosophy, and (2) to provide insight into the nature of Hegel's system by seeing how it is formed in response to this real problem in Kant. Kant is committed to a real contradiction, I claim, with his appeal to affection by the thing in itself. This appeal amounts to the claim that our reception of empirical content is unconditioned by the understanding's activity. The claim that contradicts this emerges in Kant's clearest explanation of how the categories make experience possible. We can see that they do so, he argues, by seeing that our reception of empirical content is conditioned by the understanding's activity. Kant's followers J.S. Beck and Fichte champion Kant's latter thought. I claim that their readings are true of Kant's best thought, even though Kant rejects them. He only rejects their interpretations because he cannot abandon the former thought. But Beck and Fichte see, as Kant does not, that a commitment to thing-in-itself affection in light of Kant's explanation of how the categories make experience possible would constitute what Hegel later calls "a self-contradictory ambiguity." Hegel's critique of Kant's "standpoint of finitude" diagnoses why Kant is led to affirm both of these incompatible thoughts. The philosophical motivation behind the shape Hegel's system takes comes to light through an examination of this diagnosis.
590 $a School code: 0178.
650 4 $a Metaphysics. $3 517082
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Epistemology. $3 896969
690 $a 0396
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0393
710 2 $a University of Pittsburgh. $b Philosophy. $3 3178651
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-03A(E).
790 $a 0178
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3576988