東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Powe...

Alqahtani, Bandar Jubran.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Power Plants: Paving the Way for Thermal Solar.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Power Plants: Paving the Way for Thermal Solar./
作者:	Alqahtani, Bandar Jubran.
面頁冊數:	71 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International54-03(E).
標題:	Energy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1584763
ISBN:	9781321597820

Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Power Plants: Paving the Way for Thermal Solar.
Alqahtani, Bandar Jubran.

Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Power Plants: Paving the Way for Thermal Solar. - 71 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-03.

Thesis (M.S.)--Duke University, 2015.

This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Power Plants (ISCCs), composed of a Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) plant and a Natural Gas-fired Combined Cycle (NGCC) power plant, have been recently introduced in the power generation sector as a technology with the potential to simultaneously reduce fossil fuel usage and the integration costs of solar power. This study quantifies the economic benefits of an ISCC power plant relative to a stand-alone CSP with energy storage, and a NGCC plant. A combination of tools is used to estimate the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) and the cost of carbon abatement (CoA) for CSP, NGCC and ISCC technologies under different natural gas prices, and at several locations experiencing different ambient temperatures and solar resources. Results show that an ISCC with up to 10-15% of nameplate capacity from solar energy can be cost effective as a dispatchable electricity generation resource. Integrating the CSP into an ISCC reduces the LCOE of solar-generated electricity by 35-40% relative to a stand-alone CSP plant, and provides the additional benefit of dispatchability. An ISCC also outperforms a CSP with energy storage in terms of LCOE and CoA. The current LCOE of an ISCC is lower than that of a stand-alone NGCC when fuel price reaches 13.5 $/MMBtu, while its CoA is lower at a fuel price of 8.5 $/MMBtu. Although, under low to moderate natural gas price conditions an NGCC generates electricity and abates carbon emissions at a lower cost than an ISCC; small changes in the capacity factor of an ISCC relative to the NGCC, or capital cost reductions for the CSP component have great impact tilting the balance in the ISCC's favor.

ISBN: 9781321597820Subjects--Topical Terms:

876794
Energy.

Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Power Plants: Paving the Way for Thermal Solar.
LDR:02712nmm a2200325 4500 001 2063759
005 20151102092310.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321597820
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1584763
035 $a AAI1584763
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Alqahtani, Bandar Jubran. $3 3178304
245 1 0 $a Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Power Plants: Paving the Way for Thermal Solar.
300 $a 71 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-03.
500 $a Adviser: Dalia Patino-Echeverri.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Duke University, 2015.
506 $a This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Power Plants (ISCCs), composed of a Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) plant and a Natural Gas-fired Combined Cycle (NGCC) power plant, have been recently introduced in the power generation sector as a technology with the potential to simultaneously reduce fossil fuel usage and the integration costs of solar power. This study quantifies the economic benefits of an ISCC power plant relative to a stand-alone CSP with energy storage, and a NGCC plant. A combination of tools is used to estimate the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) and the cost of carbon abatement (CoA) for CSP, NGCC and ISCC technologies under different natural gas prices, and at several locations experiencing different ambient temperatures and solar resources. Results show that an ISCC with up to 10-15% of nameplate capacity from solar energy can be cost effective as a dispatchable electricity generation resource. Integrating the CSP into an ISCC reduces the LCOE of solar-generated electricity by 35-40% relative to a stand-alone CSP plant, and provides the additional benefit of dispatchability. An ISCC also outperforms a CSP with energy storage in terms of LCOE and CoA. The current LCOE of an ISCC is lower than that of a stand-alone NGCC when fuel price reaches 13.5 $/MMBtu, while its CoA is lower at a fuel price of 8.5 $/MMBtu. Although, under low to moderate natural gas price conditions an NGCC generates electricity and abates carbon emissions at a lower cost than an ISCC; small changes in the capacity factor of an ISCC relative to the NGCC, or capital cost reductions for the CSP component have great impact tilting the balance in the ISCC's favor.
590 $a School code: 0066.
650 4 $a Energy. $3 876794
650 4 $a Alternative Energy. $3 1035473
650 4 $a Environmental economics. $3 535179
650 4 $a Environmental science. $3 677245
690 $a 0791
690 $a 0363
690 $a 0438
690 $a 0768
710 2 $a Duke University. $b Environment. $3 1018684
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 54-03(E).
790 $a 0066
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1584763