東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

There and back again: The role of re...

Shah, Rita.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

There and back again: The role of rehabilitation within California's correctional system and its impact on parole.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	There and back again: The role of rehabilitation within California's correctional system and its impact on parole./
作者:	Shah, Rita.
面頁冊數:	251 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-11, Section: A, page: 4311.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-11A.
標題:	Criminology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3466681
ISBN:	9781124802855

There and back again: The role of rehabilitation within California's correctional system and its impact on parole.
Shah, Rita.

There and back again: The role of rehabilitation within California's correctional system and its impact on parole. - 251 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-11, Section: A, page: 4311.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Irvine, 2011.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

In 2005, California restructured its correctional system to place a greater emphasis on rehabilitation. For the correctional system as a whole, and the parole system specifically, the turn to rehabilitation appears to be a (re)emergence of policy that dominated California penal law before the 1970s. It is unclear, however, whether what is meant by "rehabilitation" after 2005 is a rehashing of the policies relied upon before 1977, or if it is something different. Either way, this raises critical questions about how rehabilitation today is being translated to, through, and by state officials across the spectrum of California's complex correctional system, from legislators and regulators in Sacramento down to the field agents operating on the front lines of parole supervision.

ISBN: 9781124802855Subjects--Topical Terms:

533274
Criminology.

There and back again: The role of rehabilitation within California's correctional system and its impact on parole.
LDR:03359nmm a2200325 4500 001 2061138
005 20150929074108.5
008 170521s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124802855
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3466681
035 $a AAI3466681
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Shah, Rita. $3 3175367
245 1 0 $a There and back again: The role of rehabilitation within California's correctional system and its impact on parole.
300 $a 251 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-11, Section: A, page: 4311.
500 $a Advisers: Justin B. Richland; Mona Lynch.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Irvine, 2011.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a In 2005, California restructured its correctional system to place a greater emphasis on rehabilitation. For the correctional system as a whole, and the parole system specifically, the turn to rehabilitation appears to be a (re)emergence of policy that dominated California penal law before the 1970s. It is unclear, however, whether what is meant by "rehabilitation" after 2005 is a rehashing of the policies relied upon before 1977, or if it is something different. Either way, this raises critical questions about how rehabilitation today is being translated to, through, and by state officials across the spectrum of California's complex correctional system, from legislators and regulators in Sacramento down to the field agents operating on the front lines of parole supervision.
520 $a Using qualitative interviews and archival analysis, this project asks the following questions: 1) What is meant by rehabilitation as a goal of California's correctional system as expressed in the 2005 reorganization of the system? How does the current version compare to prior meanings of rehabilitation? 2) How did the current version of rehabilitation come about? 3) How does the legislative intent of rehabilitation impact the practice of parole? I argue that rehabilitation has two meanings. First, it is used as a form of punishment. Second, rehabilitation seems to be a process that shifts over time. Furthermore, the process seems to be greatly influenced by the role of rehabilitation within the correctional system and the current version is impacted by prior versions. Additionally, rehabilitation in California has never been a goal of the correctional system for its own sake. Rather, rehabilitation is a way of achieving the goal of public protection and how it achieves this goal is reframed at different moments in time. Finally, I argue that the two tools of parole have also been reframed over time. Specifically, I argue that in the 1940s to mid-1970s, supervision was a tool for rehabilitation; in the late 1970s to 1990s, rehabilitation was a tool for supervision; in the 2000s, rehabilitation and supervision are tools of each other, forming a feedback loop that creates an ever-expanding system of control in the community.
590 $a School code: 0030.
650 4 $a Criminology. $3 533274
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Modern history. $3 2122829
690 $a 0627
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0582
710 2 $a University of California, Irvine. $b Criminology, Law and Society - Ph.D.. $3 2102171
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-11A.
790 $a 0030
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2011
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3466681