東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Horizons of Modernity: British Anthr...

Foreman, Grahame Philip.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Horizons of Modernity: British Anthropology and the End of Empire.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Horizons of Modernity: British Anthropology and the End of Empire./
作者:	Foreman, Grahame Philip.
面頁冊數:	180 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-08A(E).
標題:	European history. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3623610
ISBN:	9781303961649

Horizons of Modernity: British Anthropology and the End of Empire.
Foreman, Grahame Philip.

Horizons of Modernity: British Anthropology and the End of Empire. - 180 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2013.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This dissertation charts the ways in which the non-West came to be thought of as part of the modern world in the late British Empire, how that project became politically unfeasible during decolonization, and how colonial social anthropology was brought to bear on Britain itself in the 1950s. I show how in late colonial era social anthropologists began to combine participant-observer fieldwork, and totalistic analysis of a locality, with the understanding of the world's cultures in interaction with each other, rather than in terms of their comparative difference. This colonial anthropology of modernity emerged within a complex matrix of institutional geographies. The branch of that project instigated by Max Gluckman involved circulations not only between metropole and colony, but crucially within the specific regional situation found in South Africa. Through these circulations Gluckman was led to develop new tools for the understanding of the social as globally modern, which were further developed by his colleagues at Manchester, and which became highly influential on new understandings of a global modernity. These tools were imported from the colonial situation to bring a vibrant and productive anthropological dimension to the study of British society in the 1950s: a project which was instigated, funded, and shaped by the demands of social democracy and the construction of a welfare state. However the participant-observation of late colonial modernity, and in particular the processes of decolonization, became impossible under the demands of an emergent security apparatus. Social anthropology's methods were not intrinsically primitivist, but they were dependent on the circulation of anthropologists and their ability to live in fieldsites for extended periods of time, forging intimate links with their subjects. This made the anthropology of modernity both unacceptable and highly vulnerable in the era of impending decolonization, and allowed the discipline's subject matter to be conditioned by political coercion, in particular through restriction of movement. Thus we can see the complex ways in which political circumstances shaped, constrained and channeled the understanding of global modernities at the end of the British Empire.

ISBN: 9781303961649Subjects--Topical Terms:

1972904
European history.

Horizons of Modernity: British Anthropology and the End of Empire.
LDR:03279nmm a2200289 4500 001 2061055
005 20150918092539.5
008 170521s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303961649
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3623610
035 $a AAI3623610
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Foreman, Grahame Philip. $3 3175279
245 1 0 $a Horizons of Modernity: British Anthropology and the End of Empire.
300 $a 180 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Martin Jay; James Vernon.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2013.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a This dissertation charts the ways in which the non-West came to be thought of as part of the modern world in the late British Empire, how that project became politically unfeasible during decolonization, and how colonial social anthropology was brought to bear on Britain itself in the 1950s. I show how in late colonial era social anthropologists began to combine participant-observer fieldwork, and totalistic analysis of a locality, with the understanding of the world's cultures in interaction with each other, rather than in terms of their comparative difference. This colonial anthropology of modernity emerged within a complex matrix of institutional geographies. The branch of that project instigated by Max Gluckman involved circulations not only between metropole and colony, but crucially within the specific regional situation found in South Africa. Through these circulations Gluckman was led to develop new tools for the understanding of the social as globally modern, which were further developed by his colleagues at Manchester, and which became highly influential on new understandings of a global modernity. These tools were imported from the colonial situation to bring a vibrant and productive anthropological dimension to the study of British society in the 1950s: a project which was instigated, funded, and shaped by the demands of social democracy and the construction of a welfare state. However the participant-observation of late colonial modernity, and in particular the processes of decolonization, became impossible under the demands of an emergent security apparatus. Social anthropology's methods were not intrinsically primitivist, but they were dependent on the circulation of anthropologists and their ability to live in fieldsites for extended periods of time, forging intimate links with their subjects. This made the anthropology of modernity both unacceptable and highly vulnerable in the era of impending decolonization, and allowed the discipline's subject matter to be conditioned by political coercion, in particular through restriction of movement. Thus we can see the complex ways in which political circumstances shaped, constrained and channeled the understanding of global modernities at the end of the British Empire.
590 $a School code: 0028.
650 4 $a European history. $2 bicssc $3 1972904
690 $a 0335
710 2 $a University of California, Berkeley. $b History. $3 1678508
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-08A(E).
790 $a 0028
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3623610