東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Exploring stakeholders' perspectives...

Yeboah, Felix Kwame.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Exploring stakeholders' perspectives and preferences for attributes of policy interventions: Three essays from two different policy and geographical contexts.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Exploring stakeholders' perspectives and preferences for attributes of policy interventions: Three essays from two different policy and geographical contexts./
作者:	Yeboah, Felix Kwame.
面頁冊數:	207 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-03(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-03B(E).
標題:	Natural resource management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3645392
ISBN:	9781321343519

Exploring stakeholders' perspectives and preferences for attributes of policy interventions: Three essays from two different policy and geographical contexts.
Yeboah, Felix Kwame.

Exploring stakeholders' perspectives and preferences for attributes of policy interventions: Three essays from two different policy and geographical contexts. - 207 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-03(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2014.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Researchers, resource managers, and development practitioners increasingly recognize the value of integrating the input and preferences of stakeholders into decision-making processes. Increasing participation of stakeholders in policy decision-making is generally considered favorable since it helps account for public concerns, reduces conflicts, increases public acceptance of and compliance with the resultant program rules, and enhances the overall effectiveness and achievement of program objectives. As part of efforts to improve program planning and foster achievement of program objectives, this dissertation explores the perspectives and preferences of key stakeholders regarding the design of two programs: Ghana's conditional cash transfer (CCT) program known as Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty program (LEAP) and the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP) in Michigan.

ISBN: 9781321343519Subjects--Topical Terms:

589570
Natural resource management.

Exploring stakeholders' perspectives and preferences for attributes of policy interventions: Three essays from two different policy and geographical contexts.
LDR:04219nmm a2200361 4500 001 2060767
005 20150924074414.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321343519
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3645392
035 $a AAI3645392
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Yeboah, Felix Kwame. $3 3174952
245 1 0 $a Exploring stakeholders' perspectives and preferences for attributes of policy interventions: Three essays from two different policy and geographical contexts.
300 $a 207 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-03(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Michael D. Kaplowitz.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2014.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Researchers, resource managers, and development practitioners increasingly recognize the value of integrating the input and preferences of stakeholders into decision-making processes. Increasing participation of stakeholders in policy decision-making is generally considered favorable since it helps account for public concerns, reduces conflicts, increases public acceptance of and compliance with the resultant program rules, and enhances the overall effectiveness and achievement of program objectives. As part of efforts to improve program planning and foster achievement of program objectives, this dissertation explores the perspectives and preferences of key stakeholders regarding the design of two programs: Ghana's conditional cash transfer (CCT) program known as Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty program (LEAP) and the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP) in Michigan.
520 $a The dissertation is built around three essays. The first essay uses qualitative and quantitative data collected in Ghana to explore the socio-cultural context of CCT program implementation in an African context. It examines perspectives of beneficiaries, program managers, and community leaders regarding Ghana's CCT program. The analysis focuses on participants' sociocultural attitudes towards poverty, perceptions of cash transfer as a poverty reduction strategy, and their experiences with LEAP implementation. The findings suggest that stakeholder groups hold a favorable view of CCT, but there is little support for giving money to the poor as a long-term poverty alleviation strategy. The Ghanaian CCT program is seen as fair and popular, but current payment levels are viewed as inadequate, impractical, and unreliable. The essay also discusses some of the challenges facing LEAP implementation in Ghana and suggests programmatic changes.
520 $a The second essay reports the findings from a discrete choice model exploring preferences of Ghanaian households in a LEAP community regarding key CCT program elements including conditionality, targeting, and payment method. The results revealed a preference for CCT designs that target beneficiaries with limited or no productive capacity and are conditional on beneficiaries either investing in children's human capital or performing communal service, relative to unconditional programs. In addition, bank deposit was the preferred payment mode relative to direct cash payment and mobile money.
520 $a The final essay also uses a discrete choice model to examine the decision of agricultural landowners in Michigan's Saginaw Bay Watershed to participate in filter strip program for watershed protection. It specifically examines the key programmatic, socio-psychological, and demographic determinants of landowners' decisions of whether or not to enroll in a CREP filter strip program. The study results indicate that making contract durations shorter with enhanced rental payments, and educating landowners about the efficacy, as well as the on- and off-farm benefits of the conservation practice would enhance participation in CREP.
590 $a School code: 0128.
650 4 $a Natural resource management. $3 589570
650 4 $a Social research. $3 2122687
650 4 $a Agricultural economics. $3 3172150
650 4 $a African history. $3 3172531
650 4 $a American history. $3 2122692
690 $a 0528
690 $a 0344
690 $a 0503
690 $a 0331
690 $a 0337
710 2 $a Michigan State University. $b Community Sustainability-Doctor of Philosophy. $3 3174953
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-03B(E).
790 $a 0128
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3645392