語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Educator Resistance to Change: A Gro...
~
Rigler, Kenneth L., Jr.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Educator Resistance to Change: A Grounded Theory Study of the Technology and Engineering Education Transition.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Educator Resistance to Change: A Grounded Theory Study of the Technology and Engineering Education Transition./
作者:
Rigler, Kenneth L., Jr.
面頁冊數:
147 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-06(E), Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International76-06A(E).
標題:
Educational evaluation. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3680560
ISBN:
9781321526271
Educator Resistance to Change: A Grounded Theory Study of the Technology and Engineering Education Transition.
Rigler, Kenneth L., Jr.
Educator Resistance to Change: A Grounded Theory Study of the Technology and Engineering Education Transition.
- 147 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-06(E), Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northcentral University, 2015.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
Technology and engineering education is a school discipline formulated out of the convergence of industrial arts, technology education, career and technical education, and engineering education. The problem is that the industrial arts educators have resisted the curricular transition to technology and engineering education and the discipline lacks a theoretical perspective that provides explanation for this phenomenon. The purpose of the qualitative grounded theory study was to explore why the industrial arts educators resisted the organizational change to technology and engineering education. An exploratory, grounded theory method was used to identify new theory related to educator resistance as the current literature does not provide a theoretical perspective as to why the industrial arts educators have resisted the change. The sampling frame was derived from a database of 379 secondary technology and engineering education teachers in the state of Kansas. Theoretical sampling was utilized in order to make adjustments as needed according to the evolving theory through the on-going data collection and analysis. A sample size of 13 participants was needed to reach theoretical saturation of the phenomenon. The data for the study was collected through observations and face-to-face semi-structured interviews with in-service industrial education teachers. Data collected from the observations and interviews were analyzed using the three-phase classic grounded theory coding technique and the analyses resulted in the emergence of three substantive theories related to the study phenomenon: (a) inefficacious transition to technology and engineering education, (b) value for technical learning, and (c) industry demand-based change. Three recommendations for professional practice included (a) differentiate current technology and engineering education curriculum from previous modular technology curriculum, (b) articulate and include technical learning opportunities within technology and engineering education curriculum, and (c) align technology and engineering education curriculum with industry and workforce needs. Three recommendations for future research included (a) a Delphi method study to operationalize the emergent theories, (b) a quantitative quasi-experimental or experimental study to test the three theories, and (c) a sample survey study related to the emergent theories distributed to a larger geographic population to generalize the findings.
ISBN: 9781321526271Subjects--Topical Terms:
526425
Educational evaluation.
Educator Resistance to Change: A Grounded Theory Study of the Technology and Engineering Education Transition.
LDR
:03529nmm a2200325 4500
001
2060341
005
20150828095346.5
008
170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781321526271
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI3680560
035
$a
AAI3680560
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Rigler, Kenneth L., Jr.
$3
3174489
245
1 0
$a
Educator Resistance to Change: A Grounded Theory Study of the Technology and Engineering Education Transition.
300
$a
147 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-06(E), Section: A.
500
$a
Adviser: Robin Throne.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northcentral University, 2015.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520
$a
Technology and engineering education is a school discipline formulated out of the convergence of industrial arts, technology education, career and technical education, and engineering education. The problem is that the industrial arts educators have resisted the curricular transition to technology and engineering education and the discipline lacks a theoretical perspective that provides explanation for this phenomenon. The purpose of the qualitative grounded theory study was to explore why the industrial arts educators resisted the organizational change to technology and engineering education. An exploratory, grounded theory method was used to identify new theory related to educator resistance as the current literature does not provide a theoretical perspective as to why the industrial arts educators have resisted the change. The sampling frame was derived from a database of 379 secondary technology and engineering education teachers in the state of Kansas. Theoretical sampling was utilized in order to make adjustments as needed according to the evolving theory through the on-going data collection and analysis. A sample size of 13 participants was needed to reach theoretical saturation of the phenomenon. The data for the study was collected through observations and face-to-face semi-structured interviews with in-service industrial education teachers. Data collected from the observations and interviews were analyzed using the three-phase classic grounded theory coding technique and the analyses resulted in the emergence of three substantive theories related to the study phenomenon: (a) inefficacious transition to technology and engineering education, (b) value for technical learning, and (c) industry demand-based change. Three recommendations for professional practice included (a) differentiate current technology and engineering education curriculum from previous modular technology curriculum, (b) articulate and include technical learning opportunities within technology and engineering education curriculum, and (c) align technology and engineering education curriculum with industry and workforce needs. Three recommendations for future research included (a) a Delphi method study to operationalize the emergent theories, (b) a quantitative quasi-experimental or experimental study to test the three theories, and (c) a sample survey study related to the emergent theories distributed to a larger geographic population to generalize the findings.
590
$a
School code: 1443.
650
4
$a
Educational evaluation.
$3
526425
650
4
$a
Industrial arts education.
$3
3173045
650
4
$a
Organizational behavior.
$3
516683
650
4
$a
Higher education administration.
$3
2122863
650
4
$a
Educational leadership.
$3
529436
690
$a
0443
690
$a
0521
690
$a
0703
690
$a
0446
690
$a
0449
710
2
$a
Northcentral University.
$b
School of Education.
$3
2104297
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
76-06A(E).
790
$a
1443
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2015
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3680560
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9292999
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入