東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Effectiveness of Pretrial Dispositio...

Lee, Jinkyoo.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Effectiveness of Pretrial Disposition Reform: Interactions between Judicial Efficiency and Access to Justice.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Effectiveness of Pretrial Disposition Reform: Interactions between Judicial Efficiency and Access to Justice./
作者:	Lee, Jinkyoo.
面頁冊數:	353 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-02(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-02A(E).
標題:	Law. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3641574
ISBN:	9781321279405

Effectiveness of Pretrial Disposition Reform: Interactions between Judicial Efficiency and Access to Justice.
Lee, Jinkyoo.

Effectiveness of Pretrial Disposition Reform: Interactions between Judicial Efficiency and Access to Justice. - 353 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-02(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2014.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Judicial efficiency achieved by filtering cases that do not deserve trial and litigants' right to access to justice are competing values of most of civil justice systems. How these two values are interacting and how these are balancing influence actors of the system, decide effectiveness of legal institutions, and lead future civil procedure reforms. Through analysis of Korean civil litigation proceedings, existing studies, observations of court hearings, and interviews with Korean judges and lawyers, this dissertation investigates how disposition without trial and related procedural safeguards of Korean civil procedure are actually working and how interactions between efficiency and procedural fairness influence actual use of procedural mechanisms. Based on that, this dissertation evaluates comparative law projects that recommend adoption of disposition without trial of the U.S. civil procedure suggested by Korean legal scholars. This dissertation argues that fundamental procedural values in action that are unique in certain society and at certain time period decide actual use of procedural devices and effectiveness of legal reforms. It also contends that, in Korean context, maximum level of access to adjudication on the merits and truth finding function of civil litigation are driving judges' and lawyers' civil litigation practices toward minimal use of disposition without trial that limits litigants' access to court and maximum use of procedural safeguards, thus establishing a one-sided model biased with access to justice in terms of balancing model. By applying this explanatory theory to comparative civil procedure projects in Korea, this dissertation evaluates these projects in light of considering fundamental procedural values in action; and illustrates the ways of designing comparative civil procedure projects that appropriately reflects contexts of adopting society and raises effectiveness of the legal reforms.

ISBN: 9781321279405Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.

Effectiveness of Pretrial Disposition Reform: Interactions between Judicial Efficiency and Access to Justice.
LDR:03017nmm a2200301 4500 001 2058921
005 20150730070613.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321279405
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3641574
035 $a AAI3641574
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Lee, Jinkyoo. $3 3172923
245 1 0 $a Effectiveness of Pretrial Disposition Reform: Interactions between Judicial Efficiency and Access to Justice.
300 $a 353 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-02(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Yong-Sung Jonathan Kang.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2014.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a Judicial efficiency achieved by filtering cases that do not deserve trial and litigants' right to access to justice are competing values of most of civil justice systems. How these two values are interacting and how these are balancing influence actors of the system, decide effectiveness of legal institutions, and lead future civil procedure reforms. Through analysis of Korean civil litigation proceedings, existing studies, observations of court hearings, and interviews with Korean judges and lawyers, this dissertation investigates how disposition without trial and related procedural safeguards of Korean civil procedure are actually working and how interactions between efficiency and procedural fairness influence actual use of procedural mechanisms. Based on that, this dissertation evaluates comparative law projects that recommend adoption of disposition without trial of the U.S. civil procedure suggested by Korean legal scholars. This dissertation argues that fundamental procedural values in action that are unique in certain society and at certain time period decide actual use of procedural devices and effectiveness of legal reforms. It also contends that, in Korean context, maximum level of access to adjudication on the merits and truth finding function of civil litigation are driving judges' and lawyers' civil litigation practices toward minimal use of disposition without trial that limits litigants' access to court and maximum use of procedural safeguards, thus establishing a one-sided model biased with access to justice in terms of balancing model. By applying this explanatory theory to comparative civil procedure projects in Korea, this dissertation evaluates these projects in light of considering fundamental procedural values in action; and illustrates the ways of designing comparative civil procedure projects that appropriately reflects contexts of adopting society and raises effectiveness of the legal reforms.
590 $a School code: 0250.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Social research. $3 2122687
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0344
710 2 $a University of Washington. $b Law. $3 2092326
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-02A(E).
790 $a 0250
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3641574