東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Veterans in Congress: The policy imp...

Knight, David M.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Veterans in Congress: The policy impact of veterans in the U.S. House of Representatives.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Veterans in Congress: The policy impact of veterans in the U.S. House of Representatives./
作者:	Knight, David M.
面頁冊數:	403 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-11(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-11A(E).
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3629910
ISBN:	9781321073676

Veterans in Congress: The policy impact of veterans in the U.S. House of Representatives.
Knight, David M.

Veterans in Congress: The policy impact of veterans in the U.S. House of Representatives. - 403 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-11(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2014.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

For much of the Cold War period, a significant majority of legislators were veterans. These Americans provided a bridge between civilian and military leadership. Today, that bridge is disappearing. Scholars now provide warnings about a chasm developing between the military and civilian worlds. Will a Congress of nonveterans enact different, less, or worse defense policies than a Congress dominated by veterans? Will they be less active, or less likely to invest the necessary amount of time, energy, and staff in the oversight of the military? To discern the policy impact of electing veterans to Congress, I examine whether veterans in the 92d (1971-1973), 103d (1993-1995), and 112th (2011-2013) Congresses are more likely to support and advocate for defense policy than their nonveteran colleagues, once one accounts for ideological, district, and institutional influences.

ISBN: 9781321073676Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.

Veterans in Congress: The policy impact of veterans in the U.S. House of Representatives.
LDR:03410nmm a2200313 4500 001 2058899
005 20150730070609.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321073676
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3629910
035 $a AAI3629910
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Knight, David M. $3 604747
245 1 0 $a Veterans in Congress: The policy impact of veterans in the U.S. House of Representatives.
300 $a 403 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-11(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Jonathan M. Ladd.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2014.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a For much of the Cold War period, a significant majority of legislators were veterans. These Americans provided a bridge between civilian and military leadership. Today, that bridge is disappearing. Scholars now provide warnings about a chasm developing between the military and civilian worlds. Will a Congress of nonveterans enact different, less, or worse defense policies than a Congress dominated by veterans? Will they be less active, or less likely to invest the necessary amount of time, energy, and staff in the oversight of the military? To discern the policy impact of electing veterans to Congress, I examine whether veterans in the 92d (1971-1973), 103d (1993-1995), and 112th (2011-2013) Congresses are more likely to support and advocate for defense policy than their nonveteran colleagues, once one accounts for ideological, district, and institutional influences.
520 $a Utilizing a specially created database, I investigate House members' commitment to defense policy through their activity in roll-call voting, bill sponsorship, bill cosponsorship, amending the National Defense Authorization Act, and their participation in committee hearings. By contrasting various forms of behavior throughout the legislative process and across multiple generations of veterans, as well as during times of war and peace, I demonstrate how behavioral differences among veterans and nonveterans affect the decision calculus concerning whether or not to pursue certain policy initiatives. Finally, instead of utilizing a dichotomous construct to distinguish between veterans and nonveterans, I differentiate among veterans based upon members' military service histories.
520 $a By carefully studying behavior throughout the legislative process, I demonstrate that even though veterans and nonveterans often vote a party line, politically significant social identities, like being a veteran, do influence the nature of proposals placed on the national agenda and the choices made about those proposals. However, the translation of preferences into policy is often mediated by the position of members within the institution, their relationship to their party caucus, and the member's level of military experience. Untangling the impact of military service on policy preferences and legislative choices allows us to consider the implications of the decline of veterans in Congress and sheds light on what the future might hold.
590 $a School code: 0076.
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Military studies. $3 2197382
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0750
710 2 $a Georgetown University. $b Government. $3 1043944
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-11A(E).
790 $a 0076
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3629910