東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The who, what, why and where of onli...

Wesner, Kearston.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The who, what, why and where of online anonymity: Toward a judicial rubric for choosing alternative unmasking standards.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The who, what, why and where of online anonymity: Toward a judicial rubric for choosing alternative unmasking standards./
Author:	Wesner, Kearston.
Description:	192 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-09A(E).
Subject:	Mass Communications. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3569451
ISBN:	9781303067181

The who, what, why and where of online anonymity: Toward a judicial rubric for choosing alternative unmasking standards.
Wesner, Kearston.

The who, what, why and where of online anonymity: Toward a judicial rubric for choosing alternative unmasking standards. - 192 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2012.

An examination of the law regarding revelation of anonymous online posters' identities revealed an initial systemic application of ad hoc procedures to guide courts' analyses, coalescing in the general adoption of one of three unmasking tests. Yet courts failed to agree which standard should apply in a given situation, creating unacceptable confusion and uncertainty, with significant First Amendment interests at stake. The dissertation proposes and defends the application of a systematized rubric to guide courts' determinations. The rubric is created by culling and consolidating the salient factors guiding courts' adoption of an unmasking standard, ascertained through a thorough analysis of the judicial opinions citing these unmasking tests. The rubric is then applied to a hypothetical scenario to demonstrate its utility for legal analysis.

ISBN: 9781303067181Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017395
Mass Communications.

The who, what, why and where of online anonymity: Toward a judicial rubric for choosing alternative unmasking standards.
LDR:01801nmm a2200289 4500 001 2055916
005 20150319081956.5
008 170521s2012 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303067181
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3569451
035 $a AAI3569451
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Wesner, Kearston. $3 3169622
245 1 4 $a The who, what, why and where of online anonymity: Toward a judicial rubric for choosing alternative unmasking standards.
300 $a 192 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Clay Calvert; Debbie Treise.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2012.
520 $a An examination of the law regarding revelation of anonymous online posters' identities revealed an initial systemic application of ad hoc procedures to guide courts' analyses, coalescing in the general adoption of one of three unmasking tests. Yet courts failed to agree which standard should apply in a given situation, creating unacceptable confusion and uncertainty, with significant First Amendment interests at stake. The dissertation proposes and defends the application of a systematized rubric to guide courts' determinations. The rubric is created by culling and consolidating the salient factors guiding courts' adoption of an unmasking standard, ascertained through a thorough analysis of the judicial opinions citing these unmasking tests. The rubric is then applied to a hypothetical scenario to demonstrate its utility for legal analysis.
590 $a School code: 0070.
650 4 $a Mass Communications. $3 1017395
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Web Studies. $3 1026830
690 $a 0708
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0646
710 2 $a University of Florida. $3 718949
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-09A(E).
790 $a 0070
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2012
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3569451