東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

How Political Violence Works: Explai...

Acosta, Benjamin.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

How Political Violence Works: Explaining Variation in Resistance Outcomes.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	How Political Violence Works: Explaining Variation in Resistance Outcomes./
作者:	Acosta, Benjamin.
面頁冊數:	227 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-11(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-11A(E).
標題:	Political Science, International Relations. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3630289
ISBN:	9781321081039

How Political Violence Works: Explaining Variation in Resistance Outcomes.
Acosta, Benjamin.

How Political Violence Works: Explaining Variation in Resistance Outcomes. - 227 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-11(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Claremont Graduate University, 2014.

To what extent are contemporary violent and nonviolent resistance organizations successful in achieving their core political ends or "outcome" goals, such as national self-determination, secession, overthrowing a government, or instituting vast social reforms? The logic put forth in much of the political bargaining literature argues that even in asymmetric contexts, political violence---due to the high costs it exacts from target populations---should work as an effective means of coercion. The opposing civil resistance literature argues that violence harms organizational efforts in asymmetric conflicts as the use of violence weakens mobilization. Contrasting both literatures, I theorize that in order to achieve victory organizations necessarily develop a supreme political command, which facilitates the strategic flexibility to pursue opportune violent or nonviolent pathways to outcome-goal success. Utilizing an original dataset that documents the attributes of over 500 resistance organizations (1980-2013), I analyze the comparative effectiveness of differing command infrastructures and strategic approaches. The results illustrate that successful organizations tend to establish a strong political command that seeks strategic advantages on both the political and military battlefields. Accordingly, differences in political infrastructure and command, more than other factors, explain variation in the achievement of contemporary resistance organizations.

ISBN: 9781321081039Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669648
Political Science, International Relations.

How Political Violence Works: Explaining Variation in Resistance Outcomes.
LDR:02377nmm a2200289 4500 001 2055393
005 20141203121530.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321081039
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3630289
035 $a AAI3630289
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Acosta, Benjamin. $3 3169047
245 1 0 $a How Political Violence Works: Explaining Variation in Resistance Outcomes.
300 $a 227 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-11(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Mark Abdollahian.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Claremont Graduate University, 2014.
520 $a To what extent are contemporary violent and nonviolent resistance organizations successful in achieving their core political ends or "outcome" goals, such as national self-determination, secession, overthrowing a government, or instituting vast social reforms? The logic put forth in much of the political bargaining literature argues that even in asymmetric contexts, political violence---due to the high costs it exacts from target populations---should work as an effective means of coercion. The opposing civil resistance literature argues that violence harms organizational efforts in asymmetric conflicts as the use of violence weakens mobilization. Contrasting both literatures, I theorize that in order to achieve victory organizations necessarily develop a supreme political command, which facilitates the strategic flexibility to pursue opportune violent or nonviolent pathways to outcome-goal success. Utilizing an original dataset that documents the attributes of over 500 resistance organizations (1980-2013), I analyze the comparative effectiveness of differing command infrastructures and strategic approaches. The results illustrate that successful organizations tend to establish a strong political command that seeks strategic advantages on both the political and military battlefields. Accordingly, differences in political infrastructure and command, more than other factors, explain variation in the achievement of contemporary resistance organizations.
590 $a School code: 0047.
650 4 $a Political Science, International Relations. $3 1669648
650 4 $a Military Studies. $3 1017606
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0750
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a The Claremont Graduate University. $b School of Politics and Economics. $3 1677457
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-11A(E).
790 $a 0047
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3630289