東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Learning from theories and practice ...

Arreola, Oscar Gabriel.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Learning from theories and practice of sustainability: In search of cohesion.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Learning from theories and practice of sustainability: In search of cohesion./
作者:	Arreola, Oscar Gabriel.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
面頁冊數:	219 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-09A(E).
標題:	Sustainability. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3701172
ISBN:	9781321716610

Learning from theories and practice of sustainability: In search of cohesion.
Arreola, Oscar Gabriel.

Learning from theories and practice of sustainability: In search of cohesion. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 219 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2015.

This dissertation began from the general question: what is sustainability? This complex question was addressed in three separate papers. Sustainability, generally, is commonly thought to have emerged from the conceptualization of sustainable development, especially after the Brundtland Report thrust the topic into the world political arena and raised research interest in the topic. The first paper traces the evolution of development theory in the move to sustainable development. The second paper reviews the construction of sustainability in the fields of agriculture, development and business and provides an analysis of whether and how these different constructions have contributed to a common understanding of sustainability. The analysis leads to conclusions about the role of values in motivations for implementing sustainability practices and the evidence for a set of minimum standards that such practices should meet. Finally, the third paper looks at whether efforts to implement sustainability on the ground follow from what academics are offering. Many communities are working on measuring their progress toward sustainability using sustainability indicators. An analysis of sustainability indicators reported by 20 communities across the U.S. is conducted using an analytical framework that evaluates indicators according to type, values-orientation, and the dimension of sustainability addressed. The results suggest some important differences between communities' interpretations of sustainability and theoreticians' interpretations in the literature.

ISBN: 9781321716610Subjects--Topical Terms:

1029978
Sustainability.

Learning from theories and practice of sustainability: In search of cohesion.
LDR:02564nmm a2200313 4500 001 2054874
005 20170424144346.5
008 170519s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321716610
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3701172
035 $a AAI3701172
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Arreola, Oscar Gabriel. $3 3168453
245 1 0 $a Learning from theories and practice of sustainability: In search of cohesion.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 219 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Includes supplementary digital materials.
500 $a Adviser: Patricia E. Norris.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2015.
520 $a This dissertation began from the general question: what is sustainability? This complex question was addressed in three separate papers. Sustainability, generally, is commonly thought to have emerged from the conceptualization of sustainable development, especially after the Brundtland Report thrust the topic into the world political arena and raised research interest in the topic. The first paper traces the evolution of development theory in the move to sustainable development. The second paper reviews the construction of sustainability in the fields of agriculture, development and business and provides an analysis of whether and how these different constructions have contributed to a common understanding of sustainability. The analysis leads to conclusions about the role of values in motivations for implementing sustainability practices and the evidence for a set of minimum standards that such practices should meet. Finally, the third paper looks at whether efforts to implement sustainability on the ground follow from what academics are offering. Many communities are working on measuring their progress toward sustainability using sustainability indicators. An analysis of sustainability indicators reported by 20 communities across the U.S. is conducted using an analytical framework that evaluates indicators according to type, values-orientation, and the dimension of sustainability addressed. The results suggest some important differences between communities' interpretations of sustainability and theoreticians' interpretations in the literature.
590 $a School code: 0128.
650 4 $a Sustainability. $3 1029978
650 4 $a Social research. $3 2122687
650 4 $a Environmental justice. $3 528369
690 $a 0640
690 $a 0344
690 $a 0619
710 2 $a Michigan State University. $b Community Sustainability. $3 2102479
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-09A(E).
790 $a 0128
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3701172