東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Mapping the differentiated consensus...

Rinderknecht, Jakob Karl.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Mapping the differentiated consensus of the joint declaration

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Mapping the differentiated consensus of the joint declaration/ by Jakob Karl Rinderknecht.
Author:	Rinderknecht, Jakob Karl.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2016.,
Description:	ix, 281 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
[NT 15003449]:	Introduction. The Problem Of Ecclesial Disunion -- Part I. The Joint Declaration: History & Critiques -- 1. Justification And Anthropology In The Jddj -- 2. The Problem Of Differentiated Consensus -- Part II. Consensus And Conceptual Mapping -- 3. What Is Ecumenical Consensus? -- 4. Consensus Despite Difference -- 5. Cognitive Linguistics And Consensus -- 6. Cognitive Linguistics And Theology -- Part III. Mapping The Differentiated Consensus In The Jddj -- 7. Mapping The Catholic Blend: Trent & Concupiscence -- 8. The Catholic Blend Sin And The Jddj -- 9. Mapping The Lutheran Blend: Simul Iustus Et Peccator -- 10. The Lutheran Blend Sin And The Jddj -- Conclusion. Differentiated Consensus In The Jddj.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
Subject:	Concord - Religious aspects -
Online resource:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40099-0
ISBN:	9783319400990

Mapping the differentiated consensus of the joint declaration
Rinderknecht, Jakob Karl.

Mapping the differentiated consensus of the joint declaration[electronic resource] /by Jakob Karl Rinderknecht. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2016. - ix, 281 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Pathways for ecumenical and interreligious dialogue. - Pathways for ecumenical and interreligious dialogue..

Introduction. The Problem Of Ecclesial Disunion -- Part I. The Joint Declaration: History & Critiques -- 1. Justification And Anthropology In The Jddj -- 2. The Problem Of Differentiated Consensus -- Part II. Consensus And Conceptual Mapping -- 3. What Is Ecumenical Consensus? -- 4. Consensus Despite Difference -- 5. Cognitive Linguistics And Consensus -- 6. Cognitive Linguistics And Theology -- Part III. Mapping The Differentiated Consensus In The Jddj -- 7. Mapping The Catholic Blend: Trent & Concupiscence -- 8. The Catholic Blend Sin And The Jddj -- 9. Mapping The Lutheran Blend: Simul Iustus Et Peccator -- 10. The Lutheran Blend Sin And The Jddj -- Conclusion. Differentiated Consensus In The Jddj.

This book uses the insights of cognitive linguistics to argue for the possibility of differentiated consensus between separated churches. The Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification, signed by the Lutheran World Federation and the Roman Catholic Church in 1999, represents the high water mark of the twentieth-century ecumenical movement. It declares that the sixteenth-century condemnations related to justification do not condemn the teachings of the partner church. Some critics reject the agreement, arguing that a consensus that is differentiated is not actually a consensus. In this book, Jakob Karl Rinderknecht shows that mapping the "cognitive blends" that structure meaning can reveal underlying agreement within apparent theological contradictions. He traces Lutheran and Catholic positions on sin in the baptized, especially the Lutheran simul iustus et peccator and the Catholic insistence that concupiscence in the baptized is not sin. He demonstrates that the JDDJ reconciles these positions, and therefore that a truly differentiated consensus is possible.

ISBN: 9783319400990

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-40099-0doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

3167085
Concord
--Religious aspects

LC Class. No.: BV4647.C6

Dewey Class. No.: 231.044

Mapping the differentiated consensus of the joint declaration
LDR:02813nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 2053889
003 DE-He213
005 20161010084410.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 170510s2016 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319400990 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319400983 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-40099-0 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-40099-0
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a BV4647.C6
072 7 $a HRCM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a REL067000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 231.044 $2 23
090 $a BV4647.C6 $b R579 2016
100 1 $a Rinderknecht, Jakob Karl. $3 3167084
245 1 0 $a Mapping the differentiated consensus of the joint declaration $h [electronic resource] / $c by Jakob Karl Rinderknecht.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2016.
300 $a ix, 281 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Pathways for ecumenical and interreligious dialogue
505 0 $a Introduction. The Problem Of Ecclesial Disunion -- Part I. The Joint Declaration: History & Critiques -- 1. Justification And Anthropology In The Jddj -- 2. The Problem Of Differentiated Consensus -- Part II. Consensus And Conceptual Mapping -- 3. What Is Ecumenical Consensus? -- 4. Consensus Despite Difference -- 5. Cognitive Linguistics And Consensus -- 6. Cognitive Linguistics And Theology -- Part III. Mapping The Differentiated Consensus In The Jddj -- 7. Mapping The Catholic Blend: Trent & Concupiscence -- 8. The Catholic Blend Sin And The Jddj -- 9. Mapping The Lutheran Blend: Simul Iustus Et Peccator -- 10. The Lutheran Blend Sin And The Jddj -- Conclusion. Differentiated Consensus In The Jddj.
520 $a This book uses the insights of cognitive linguistics to argue for the possibility of differentiated consensus between separated churches. The Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification, signed by the Lutheran World Federation and the Roman Catholic Church in 1999, represents the high water mark of the twentieth-century ecumenical movement. It declares that the sixteenth-century condemnations related to justification do not condemn the teachings of the partner church. Some critics reject the agreement, arguing that a consensus that is differentiated is not actually a consensus. In this book, Jakob Karl Rinderknecht shows that mapping the "cognitive blends" that structure meaning can reveal underlying agreement within apparent theological contradictions. He traces Lutheran and Catholic positions on sin in the baptized, especially the Lutheran simul iustus et peccator and the Catholic insistence that concupiscence in the baptized is not sin. He demonstrates that the JDDJ reconciles these positions, and therefore that a truly differentiated consensus is possible.
650 0 $a Concord $x Religious aspects $x Christianity. $3 3167085
650 0 $a Spiritual life $x Christianity. $3 758415
650 1 4 $a Religious Studies. $3 898499
650 2 4 $a Christian Theology. $3 2200540
650 2 4 $a Comparative Religion. $3 2182174
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Religion. $3 896987
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Pathways for ecumenical and interreligious dialogue. $3 2182173
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40099-0
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (Springer-41175)