東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The paradox of diversity = why does ...

Achbari, Wahideh.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The paradox of diversity = why does interethnic contact in voluntary organizations not lead to generalized trust? /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The paradox of diversity/ by Wahideh Achbari.
Reminder of title:	why does interethnic contact in voluntary organizations not lead to generalized trust? /
Author:	Achbari, Wahideh.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2016.,
Description:	xiv, 145 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
[NT 15003449]:	Chapter 1: Introduction: Why this book? -- Chapter 2: Bridging versus Bonding Practices: Setting the Context -- Chapter 3: Generalized Trust: Socialization through Interethnic Contact? -- Chapter 4: Who Can Afford to Evaluate Strangers as Trustworthy? -- Chapter 5: Discussion and Conclusion: The Promise of Social Success.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
Subject:	Social sciences. -
Online resource:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44243-3
ISBN:	9783319442433$q(electronic bk.)

The paradox of diversity = why does interethnic contact in voluntary organizations not lead to generalized trust? /
Achbari, Wahideh.

The paradox of diversitywhy does interethnic contact in voluntary organizations not lead to generalized trust? /[electronic resource] :by Wahideh Achbari. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2016. - xiv, 145 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - IMISCOE research series,2364-4087. - IMISCOE research series..

Chapter 1: Introduction: Why this book? -- Chapter 2: Bridging versus Bonding Practices: Setting the Context -- Chapter 3: Generalized Trust: Socialization through Interethnic Contact? -- Chapter 4: Who Can Afford to Evaluate Strangers as Trustworthy? -- Chapter 5: Discussion and Conclusion: The Promise of Social Success.

This book is about ethnic diversity in voluntary organizations and seeks to explain whether intergroup contact contributes to the development of generalized trust. It relies on a novel multilevel design and data from Amsterdam in which 40 voluntary organizations and 463 participants have been sampled. Contrary to conventional wisdom, this book argues that cognitive processes are contributing more toward the evaluation of strangers or generalized trust than interethnic contact. Since trusting unknown people is essentially a risky endeavor, this suggests that participants of both association types who report trusting strangers can afford to do so, because they are better educated, have a more positive worldview, and have had fewer negative life experiences. That is to say, they are socially more successful and view their future as more promising. Previous findings are inconclusive since most studies that conclude diversity has led to less generalized trust do not include interethnic contact directly in their analyses. These studies also downplay the importance of cognitive processes, which may shape generalized trust. What is more, people join ethnically diverse civic groups, because they already have more trustful attitudes, rather than learning to trust through interethnic contact. Despite the recent multiculturalist backlash, this book demonstrates that participation in ethno-national organizations does not pose a threat to social cohesion. The analysis in this book serves to build a general theory of trust that moves beyond emphasizing interaction between people who are different from each other, but one that includes the importance of cognition.

ISBN: 9783319442433$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-44243-3doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

516032
Social sciences.

LC Class. No.: GN370

Dewey Class. No.: 304.8

The paradox of diversity = why does interethnic contact in voluntary organizations not lead to generalized trust? /
LDR:03032nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 2051927
003 DE-He213
005 20170302173342.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 170421s2016 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319442433$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319442419$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-44243-3 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-44243-3
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a GN370
072 7 $a JFFN $2 bicssc
072 7 $a SOC007000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 304.8 $2 23
090 $a GN370 $b .A176 2016
100 1 $a Achbari, Wahideh. $3 3134718
245 1 4 $a The paradox of diversity $h [electronic resource] : $b why does interethnic contact in voluntary organizations not lead to generalized trust? / $c by Wahideh Achbari.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2016.
300 $a xiv, 145 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a IMISCOE research series, $x 2364-4087
505 0 $a Chapter 1: Introduction: Why this book? -- Chapter 2: Bridging versus Bonding Practices: Setting the Context -- Chapter 3: Generalized Trust: Socialization through Interethnic Contact? -- Chapter 4: Who Can Afford to Evaluate Strangers as Trustworthy? -- Chapter 5: Discussion and Conclusion: The Promise of Social Success.
520 $a This book is about ethnic diversity in voluntary organizations and seeks to explain whether intergroup contact contributes to the development of generalized trust. It relies on a novel multilevel design and data from Amsterdam in which 40 voluntary organizations and 463 participants have been sampled. Contrary to conventional wisdom, this book argues that cognitive processes are contributing more toward the evaluation of strangers or generalized trust than interethnic contact. Since trusting unknown people is essentially a risky endeavor, this suggests that participants of both association types who report trusting strangers can afford to do so, because they are better educated, have a more positive worldview, and have had fewer negative life experiences. That is to say, they are socially more successful and view their future as more promising. Previous findings are inconclusive since most studies that conclude diversity has led to less generalized trust do not include interethnic contact directly in their analyses. These studies also downplay the importance of cognitive processes, which may shape generalized trust. What is more, people join ethnically diverse civic groups, because they already have more trustful attitudes, rather than learning to trust through interethnic contact. Despite the recent multiculturalist backlash, this book demonstrates that participation in ethno-national organizations does not pose a threat to social cohesion. The analysis in this book serves to build a general theory of trust that moves beyond emphasizing interaction between people who are different from each other, but one that includes the importance of cognition.
650 0 $a Social sciences. $3 516032
650 0 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 0 $a Sociology. $3 516174
650 0 $a Emigration and immigration. $3 542659
650 0 $a Cross-cultural psychology. $3 3134719
650 1 4 $a Social Sciences. $3 786955
650 2 4 $a Migration. $3 899018
650 2 4 $a Cross Cultural Psychology. $3 894972
650 2 4 $a Political Science. $3 895291
650 2 4 $a Sociology, general. $3 1565473
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a IMISCOE research series. $3 2153356
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44243-3
950 $a Social Sciences (Springer-41176)