東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Comparing the prospective effect of ...

Steiner, Eva.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Comparing the prospective effect of judicial rulings across jurisdictions

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Comparing the prospective effect of judicial rulings across jurisdictions/ by Eva Steiner.
作者:	Steiner, Eva.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2015.,
面頁冊數:	xi, 382 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Conflict of judicial decisions. -
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16175-4
ISBN:	9783319161754 (electronic bk.)

Comparing the prospective effect of judicial rulings across jurisdictions
Steiner, Eva.

Comparing the prospective effect of judicial rulings across jurisdictions[electronic resource] /by Eva Steiner. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2015. - xi, 382 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Ius comparatum - global studies in comparative law,v.32214-6881 ;. - Ius comparatum ;v.3..

This work deals with the temporal effect of judicial decisions, and more specifically, with the hardship caused by the retroactive operation of overruling decisions. By means of a jurisprudential and comparative analysis, the book explores several issues created by the overruling of earlier decisions. Overruling of earlier decisions, when it occurs, operates retrospectively with the effect that it infringes the principle of legal certainty through upsetting any previous arrangements made by a party to a case under long standing precedents established previously by the courts. On this account, in the recent past, a number of jurisdictions have had to deal with the prospect of introducing in their own systems the well-established US practice of prospective overruling whereby the court may announce in advance that it will change the relevant rule or interpretation of the rule but only for future cases. However, adopting prospective overruling raises a series of issues mainly related to the constitutional limits of the judicial function coupled with the practical difficulties attendant upon such a practice. This book answers a number of the questions raised by this practice. It makes use of the great reservoir of foreign legal experience that furnishes theoretical and practical ideas from which national judges may draw their knowledge and inspiration in order to be able to advise a rational method of dealing with time when they give their decisions.

ISBN: 9783319161754 (electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-16175-4doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

2153377
Conflict of judicial decisions.

LC Class. No.: K7040

Dewey Class. No.: 340.9

Comparing the prospective effect of judicial rulings across jurisdictions
LDR:02553nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 2006455
003 DE-He213
005 20151230171739.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 160114s2015 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319161754 (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319161747 (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-16175-4 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-16175-4
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a K7040
072 7 $a LB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LAW016000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 340.9 $2 23
090 $a K7040 $b .S822 2015
100 1 $a Steiner, Eva. $3 2153375
245 1 0 $a Comparing the prospective effect of judicial rulings across jurisdictions $h [electronic resource] / $c by Eva Steiner.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2015.
300 $a xi, 382 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Ius comparatum - global studies in comparative law, $x 2214-6881 ; $v v.3
520 $a This work deals with the temporal effect of judicial decisions, and more specifically, with the hardship caused by the retroactive operation of overruling decisions. By means of a jurisprudential and comparative analysis, the book explores several issues created by the overruling of earlier decisions. Overruling of earlier decisions, when it occurs, operates retrospectively with the effect that it infringes the principle of legal certainty through upsetting any previous arrangements made by a party to a case under long standing precedents established previously by the courts. On this account, in the recent past, a number of jurisdictions have had to deal with the prospect of introducing in their own systems the well-established US practice of prospective overruling whereby the court may announce in advance that it will change the relevant rule or interpretation of the rule but only for future cases. However, adopting prospective overruling raises a series of issues mainly related to the constitutional limits of the judicial function coupled with the practical difficulties attendant upon such a practice. This book answers a number of the questions raised by this practice. It makes use of the great reservoir of foreign legal experience that furnishes theoretical and practical ideas from which national judges may draw their knowledge and inspiration in order to be able to advise a rational method of dealing with time when they give their decisions.
650 0 $a Conflict of judicial decisions. $3 2153377
650 0 $a Prospective overruling. $3 2153378
650 0 $a Retroactive judicial decisions. $3 2153379
650 0 $a Jurisdiction, Territorial. $3 625360
650 1 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 2 4 $a Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law. $3 1566062
650 2 4 $a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. $3 1565627
650 2 4 $a Criminal Law. $3 842261
650 2 4 $a Constitutional Law. $3 896981
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Ius comparatum ; $v v.3. $3 2153376
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16175-4
950 $a Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (Springer-11648)