東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Past and present interactions in leg...

Armgardt, Matthias.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Past and present interactions in legal reasoning and logic

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Past and present interactions in legal reasoning and logic/ edited by Matthias Armgardt, Patrice Canivez, Sandrine Chassagnard-Pinet.
other author:	Armgardt, Matthias.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2015.,
Description:	xi, 270 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
[NT 15003449]:	General Introduction; Patrice Canivez and Giuliano Bacigalupo -- Part 1. Roman Law and Logic -- Proculus on the Meanings of OR and the Types of Disjunction; Karlheinz Hulser -- Disjunctive Statements in Roman Legal Arguments; Markus Winkler -- Part 2. Leibniz, Law and Logic -- Presumptions and Conjectures in Leibniz's Legal Theory; Matthias Armgardt -- Suspensive Condition & Dynamic Epistemic Logic; Sebastien Magnier -- The Rhetor's Dilemma: Leibniz's Approach to an Ancient Case; Bettine Jankowski -- Part 3. Current Interactions between Law and Logic -- On Hypothetical Judgements and Leibniz's Notion of Conditional Right; Shahid Rahman -- Legal Fictions, Assumptions and Comparisons; Giuliano Bacigalupo -- Reasoning with Form & Content; Juliele Sievers and Sebastien Magnier -- Note on a Second Order Game in Legal Practice; Reinhard Z. Bengez -- Conflict of Norms and Conflict of Values in Law; Sandrine Chassagnard-Pinet -- The Service Contract (Contrat d'Entreprise); Juliette Senechal.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
Subject:	Law - Methodology. -
Online resource:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16021-4
ISBN:	9783319160214 (electronic bk.)

Past and present interactions in legal reasoning and logic
Past and present interactions in legal reasoning and logic[electronic resource] /edited by Matthias Armgardt, Patrice Canivez, Sandrine Chassagnard-Pinet. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2015. - xi, 270 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Logic, argumentation & reasoning,v.72214-9120 ;. - Logic, argumentation & reasoning ;v.2..

General Introduction; Patrice Canivez and Giuliano Bacigalupo -- Part 1. Roman Law and Logic -- Proculus on the Meanings of OR and the Types of Disjunction; Karlheinz Hulser -- Disjunctive Statements in Roman Legal Arguments; Markus Winkler -- Part 2. Leibniz, Law and Logic -- Presumptions and Conjectures in Leibniz's Legal Theory; Matthias Armgardt -- Suspensive Condition & Dynamic Epistemic Logic; Sebastien Magnier -- The Rhetor's Dilemma: Leibniz's Approach to an Ancient Case; Bettine Jankowski -- Part 3. Current Interactions between Law and Logic -- On Hypothetical Judgements and Leibniz's Notion of Conditional Right; Shahid Rahman -- Legal Fictions, Assumptions and Comparisons; Giuliano Bacigalupo -- Reasoning with Form & Content; Juliele Sievers and Sebastien Magnier -- Note on a Second Order Game in Legal Practice; Reinhard Z. Bengez -- Conflict of Norms and Conflict of Values in Law; Sandrine Chassagnard-Pinet -- The Service Contract (Contrat d'Entreprise); Juliette Senechal.

This volume explores the relation between legal reasoning and logic from both a historical and a systematic perspective. The topics addressed include, among others, conditional legal acts, disjunctions in legal acts, presumptions and conjectures, conflicts of values, Jorgensen's Dilemma, the Rhetor's Dilemma, the theory of legal fictions, and the categorization of contracts. The unifying problematic of these contributions concerns the conditional structures and, more particularly, the relationship between legal theory and legal reasoning in the context of conditions. The contributions in this work constitute the first results of the ANR-DFG joint research project "JuriLog" (Jurisprudence and Logic), which aims at fostering the cooperation between legal scholars and philosophers. On the one hand, lawyers and legal scholars have an interest in emphasizing the logical character of legal reasoning. In this respect, the present enquiry examines the question of how logic, especially newer forms of dialogical logic, can be made fruitful as a significant area of philosophy for jurisprudence and legal practice. On the other hand, logicians find in legal reasoning a striving towards clear definitions and inference-procedures that is relevant to their discipline. In order to fully understand such reciprocal relationships, it is necessary to bridge the gap between law, logic and philosophy in contemporary academic research. The essays collected in this volume all work towards this common goal. The book is divided in three sections. In the first part, the strong relation between Roman Law and logic is explored with respect to the analysis of disjunctive statements in legal acts. The second part focuses on Leibniz's legal theory. The third part, finally, is dedicated to current interactions between law and logic.

ISBN: 9783319160214 (electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-16021-4doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

587155
Law
--Methodology.

LC Class. No.: K213

Dewey Class. No.: 340.1

Past and present interactions in legal reasoning and logic
LDR:03925nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 2006452
003 DE-He213
005 20151230163259.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 160114s2015 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319160214 (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319160207 (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-16021-4 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-16021-4
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a K213
072 7 $a LAB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI021000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LAW000000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 340.1 $2 23
090 $a K213 $b .P291 2015
245 0 0 $a Past and present interactions in legal reasoning and logic $h [electronic resource] / $c edited by Matthias Armgardt, Patrice Canivez, Sandrine Chassagnard-Pinet.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2015.
300 $a xi, 270 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Logic, argumentation & reasoning, $x 2214-9120 ; $v v.7
505 0 $a General Introduction; Patrice Canivez and Giuliano Bacigalupo -- Part 1. Roman Law and Logic -- Proculus on the Meanings of OR and the Types of Disjunction; Karlheinz Hulser -- Disjunctive Statements in Roman Legal Arguments; Markus Winkler -- Part 2. Leibniz, Law and Logic -- Presumptions and Conjectures in Leibniz's Legal Theory; Matthias Armgardt -- Suspensive Condition & Dynamic Epistemic Logic; Sebastien Magnier -- The Rhetor's Dilemma: Leibniz's Approach to an Ancient Case; Bettine Jankowski -- Part 3. Current Interactions between Law and Logic -- On Hypothetical Judgements and Leibniz's Notion of Conditional Right; Shahid Rahman -- Legal Fictions, Assumptions and Comparisons; Giuliano Bacigalupo -- Reasoning with Form & Content; Juliele Sievers and Sebastien Magnier -- Note on a Second Order Game in Legal Practice; Reinhard Z. Bengez -- Conflict of Norms and Conflict of Values in Law; Sandrine Chassagnard-Pinet -- The Service Contract (Contrat d'Entreprise); Juliette Senechal.
520 $a This volume explores the relation between legal reasoning and logic from both a historical and a systematic perspective. The topics addressed include, among others, conditional legal acts, disjunctions in legal acts, presumptions and conjectures, conflicts of values, Jorgensen's Dilemma, the Rhetor's Dilemma, the theory of legal fictions, and the categorization of contracts. The unifying problematic of these contributions concerns the conditional structures and, more particularly, the relationship between legal theory and legal reasoning in the context of conditions. The contributions in this work constitute the first results of the ANR-DFG joint research project "JuriLog" (Jurisprudence and Logic), which aims at fostering the cooperation between legal scholars and philosophers. On the one hand, lawyers and legal scholars have an interest in emphasizing the logical character of legal reasoning. In this respect, the present enquiry examines the question of how logic, especially newer forms of dialogical logic, can be made fruitful as a significant area of philosophy for jurisprudence and legal practice. On the other hand, logicians find in legal reasoning a striving towards clear definitions and inference-procedures that is relevant to their discipline. In order to fully understand such reciprocal relationships, it is necessary to bridge the gap between law, logic and philosophy in contemporary academic research. The essays collected in this volume all work towards this common goal. The book is divided in three sections. In the first part, the strong relation between Roman Law and logic is explored with respect to the analysis of disjunctive statements in legal acts. The second part focuses on Leibniz's legal theory. The third part, finally, is dedicated to current interactions between law and logic.
650 0 $a Law $x Methodology. $3 587155
650 0 $a Conditionals (Logic) $3 631217
650 1 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Law. $3 893937
650 2 4 $a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. $3 1565627
650 2 4 $a Logic. $3 529544
650 2 4 $a Applied Linguistics. $3 896965
650 2 4 $a Knowledge - Discourse. $3 2068364
700 1 $a Armgardt, Matthias. $3 2153373
700 1 $a Canivez, Patrice. $3 2014300
700 1 $a Chassagnard-Pinet, Sandrine. $3 2153374
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Logic, argumentation & reasoning ; $v v.2. $3 2057027
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16021-4
950 $a Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (Springer-11648)