東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Artisan food processing and food saf...

Buckley, Jenifer Ann.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Artisan food processing and food safety regulation in Michigan: An actor-network study of interactions, interests, and fluid boundaries.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Artisan food processing and food safety regulation in Michigan: An actor-network study of interactions, interests, and fluid boundaries./
Author:	Buckley, Jenifer Ann.
Description:	174 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-04A(E).
Subject:	Sociology, Theory and Methods. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3606063
ISBN:	9781303630835

Artisan food processing and food safety regulation in Michigan: An actor-network study of interactions, interests, and fluid boundaries.
Buckley, Jenifer Ann.

Artisan food processing and food safety regulation in Michigan: An actor-network study of interactions, interests, and fluid boundaries. - 174 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-04(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2013.

Conventional wisdom has it that food safety regulations impede the practice of artisanship and other smaller-scale food processing. Artisan food processors are seen to carry on craft production methods steeped in tradition and adapted to the idiosyncrasies of individual situations, while food safety inspectors are seen to enforce broad standards formulated in scientific and political processes that are stacked against smaller producers. Current debates on regulatory responses to this trend, however, are stymied by a scarcity of research on the practice of artisanship in contemporary regulated contexts and on the practical enforcement of food safety regulations during inspections.

ISBN: 9781303630835Subjects--Topical Terms:

626625
Sociology, Theory and Methods.

Artisan food processing and food safety regulation in Michigan: An actor-network study of interactions, interests, and fluid boundaries.
LDR:03055nam a2200313 4500 001 1968908
005 20141231071634.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303630835
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3606063
035 $a AAI3606063
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Buckley, Jenifer Ann. $3 2106138
245 1 0 $a Artisan food processing and food safety regulation in Michigan: An actor-network study of interactions, interests, and fluid boundaries.
300 $a 174 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-04(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: James Bingen.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2013.
520 $a Conventional wisdom has it that food safety regulations impede the practice of artisanship and other smaller-scale food processing. Artisan food processors are seen to carry on craft production methods steeped in tradition and adapted to the idiosyncrasies of individual situations, while food safety inspectors are seen to enforce broad standards formulated in scientific and political processes that are stacked against smaller producers. Current debates on regulatory responses to this trend, however, are stymied by a scarcity of research on the practice of artisanship in contemporary regulated contexts and on the practical enforcement of food safety regulations during inspections.
520 $a This dissertation presents an exploratory ethnographic study that examined the food safety regulation of artisan processing in Michigan. (Artisan processing is defined here as processing conducted at a small or medium scale in which producers emphasize manual production techniques and are involved at each step of the process. It involves batch rather than continuous production and allows for variability in products and processes.) Careful attention to artisan-inspector interactions illuminated aspects of artisanship, regulation, and the relationship between them that are not captured in broad narratives of conflict or in a focus on written rules. Dichotomies blurred; spaces of overlap and mutuality opened up between interests, actors, and social phenomena that are otherwise considered inimical to each other. Conventional distinctions also blurred during fieldwork, as the flow of information and control of the study moved both ways between researcher and research participants.
520 $a Chapter 1 presents the methodology that was developed for the investigation and that built on science and technology studies (STS), primarily actor-network theory. Chapters 2 and 3 present two analytic perspectives on the findings, drawn from economic theories of regulation and STS, respectively. The dissertation concludes with recommendations for policy, practice, and further research.
590 $a School code: 0128.
650 4 $a Sociology, Theory and Methods. $3 626625
650 4 $a Agriculture, General. $3 1017510
650 4 $a Sociology, Public and Social Welfare. $3 1017909
690 $a 0344
690 $a 0473
690 $a 0630
710 2 $a Michigan State University. $b Community, Agriculture, Recreation and Resource Studies - Doctor of Philosophy. $3 2092511
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-04A(E).
790 $a 0128
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3606063