東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Rural water development in sub-Sahar...

de Cecco, Paola.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Rural water development in sub-Saharan Africa: A comparative study between Uganda and Tanzania.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Rural water development in sub-Saharan Africa: A comparative study between Uganda and Tanzania./
作者:	de Cecco, Paola.
面頁冊數:	213 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 51-04.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International51-04(E).
標題:	Environmental Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1533050
ISBN:	9781267901385

Rural water development in sub-Saharan Africa: A comparative study between Uganda and Tanzania.
de Cecco, Paola.

Rural water development in sub-Saharan Africa: A comparative study between Uganda and Tanzania. - 213 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 51-04.

Thesis (M.S.)--San Jose State University, 2012.

Global transnational efforts to achieve the Millennium Development Goal of halving the world population lacking access to improved water supplies are failing to address sustainable development in sub-Saharan rural communities. These efforts have been driven largely by water governance strategies centered on the controversial principle that water is an economic good, and as such, the development of water services shall be left to the supply-demand mechanisms regulating commodities' markets. Uganda and Tanzania have embraced these strategies to varying degrees and have made strikingly different progress in developing their rural water sector. Uganda has maintained a steady rate of improvement in rural water coverage, while Tanzania has not. This comparative study between Tanzania's and Uganda's water governance principles and development approaches combined qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews and water policies with participant observation of two case studies. The results of the study suggest the success of Uganda's approach to water governance stems from the government commitment to retaining its role of providing basic services for the poorest strata of the population, de facto guaranteeing the constitutional right to water for all citizens irrespective of their economic status.

ISBN: 9781267901385Subjects--Topical Terms:

893809
Environmental Management.

Rural water development in sub-Saharan Africa: A comparative study between Uganda and Tanzania.
LDR:02188nam a2200277 4500 001 1968793
005 20141231071601.5
008 150210s2012 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781267901385
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1533050
035 $a AAI1533050
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a de Cecco, Paola. $3 2105993
245 1 0 $a Rural water development in sub-Saharan Africa: A comparative study between Uganda and Tanzania.
300 $a 213 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 51-04.
500 $a Adviser: William H. Russell.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--San Jose State University, 2012.
520 $a Global transnational efforts to achieve the Millennium Development Goal of halving the world population lacking access to improved water supplies are failing to address sustainable development in sub-Saharan rural communities. These efforts have been driven largely by water governance strategies centered on the controversial principle that water is an economic good, and as such, the development of water services shall be left to the supply-demand mechanisms regulating commodities' markets. Uganda and Tanzania have embraced these strategies to varying degrees and have made strikingly different progress in developing their rural water sector. Uganda has maintained a steady rate of improvement in rural water coverage, while Tanzania has not. This comparative study between Tanzania's and Uganda's water governance principles and development approaches combined qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews and water policies with participant observation of two case studies. The results of the study suggest the success of Uganda's approach to water governance stems from the government commitment to retaining its role of providing basic services for the poorest strata of the population, de facto guaranteeing the constitutional right to water for all citizens irrespective of their economic status.
590 $a School code: 6265.
650 4 $a Environmental Management. $3 893809
650 4 $a Water Resource Management. $3 1669219
690 $a 0474
690 $a 0595
710 2 $a San Jose State University. $b Environmental Studies. $3 2105994
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 51-04(E).
790 $a 6265
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2012
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1533050