東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Tracking the evolution of theoretica...

Singleton, Laura G.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Tracking the evolution of theoretical constructs in organizational scholarship: Examining cooperation and purpose.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Tracking the evolution of theoretical constructs in organizational scholarship: Examining cooperation and purpose./
作者:	Singleton, Laura G.
面頁冊數:	317 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-07(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International73-07A(E).
標題:	Sociology, Organization Theory. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3499377
ISBN:	9781267237279

Tracking the evolution of theoretical constructs in organizational scholarship: Examining cooperation and purpose.
Singleton, Laura G.

Tracking the evolution of theoretical constructs in organizational scholarship: Examining cooperation and purpose. - 317 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-07(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston College, 2011.

I examine the process of evolution for theoretical constructs in the field of organizational scholarship, leveraging the sociology of knowledge literature and empirical studies of construct development to focus my research. Prior studies suggest several key factors operating in the process---actor-oriented components, including the characteristics and strategies of scholarly actors, and situationally-oriented components of historical context and word meanings. No study, however, has assessed these factors in interaction over time. I address this gap through a historical study based primarily on archival data regarding construct usage in journal articles and scholarly books. Specifically, I explore the evolution of "cooperation" and "purpose" in organizational scholarship from 1938 through 2005. My findings contribute to elaboration of the theory of construct evolution proposed by Hirsch & Levin (1999), as I observe that a construct developing largely within a single disciplinary paradigm is marked by narrowing rather than expansion of meaning in the course of increased operationalization. Further, I find that an interdisciplinary context of evolution multiplies not just meanings but also the language used for a construct. I also document how antecedent conditions of meaning for the words "cooperation" and "purpose," as well as elements of historical context, affect the evolution process. In addition, my study extends the observations of Barley & Kunda (1992) regarding a cyclical dichotomy between rational and normative paradigms in managerial discourse, as I observe this pattern contributing to the fragmentation of language and meanings in the constructs studied.

ISBN: 9781267237279Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669248
Sociology, Organization Theory.

Tracking the evolution of theoretical constructs in organizational scholarship: Examining cooperation and purpose.
LDR:02619nam a2200289 4500 001 1968680
005 20141210113417.5
008 150210s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781267237279
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3499377
035 $a AAI3499377
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Singleton, Laura G. $3 2105861
245 1 0 $a Tracking the evolution of theoretical constructs in organizational scholarship: Examining cooperation and purpose.
300 $a 317 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-07(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Mary Ann Glynn.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston College, 2011.
520 $a I examine the process of evolution for theoretical constructs in the field of organizational scholarship, leveraging the sociology of knowledge literature and empirical studies of construct development to focus my research. Prior studies suggest several key factors operating in the process---actor-oriented components, including the characteristics and strategies of scholarly actors, and situationally-oriented components of historical context and word meanings. No study, however, has assessed these factors in interaction over time. I address this gap through a historical study based primarily on archival data regarding construct usage in journal articles and scholarly books. Specifically, I explore the evolution of "cooperation" and "purpose" in organizational scholarship from 1938 through 2005. My findings contribute to elaboration of the theory of construct evolution proposed by Hirsch & Levin (1999), as I observe that a construct developing largely within a single disciplinary paradigm is marked by narrowing rather than expansion of meaning in the course of increased operationalization. Further, I find that an interdisciplinary context of evolution multiplies not just meanings but also the language used for a construct. I also document how antecedent conditions of meaning for the words "cooperation" and "purpose," as well as elements of historical context, affect the evolution process. In addition, my study extends the observations of Barley & Kunda (1992) regarding a cyclical dichotomy between rational and normative paradigms in managerial discourse, as I observe this pattern contributing to the fragmentation of language and meanings in the constructs studied.
590 $a School code: 0016.
650 4 $a Sociology, Organization Theory. $3 1669248
650 4 $a Sociology, Organizational. $3 1018023
650 4 $a History of Science. $3 896972
690 $a 0635
690 $a 0703
690 $a 0585
710 2 $a Boston College. $b Carroll School of Management. $3 1030268
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 73-07A(E).
790 $a 0016
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2011
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3499377