東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Blending and bridging in field forma...

Lo, Yu-Chieh (Jade).

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Blending and bridging in field formation.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Blending and bridging in field formation./
作者:	Lo, Yu-Chieh (Jade).
面頁冊數:	197 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-09, Section: A, page: 3327.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-09A.
標題:	Business Administration, General. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3418109
ISBN:	9781124161204

Blending and bridging in field formation.
Lo, Yu-Chieh (Jade).

Blending and bridging in field formation. - 197 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-09, Section: A, page: 3327.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Southern California, 2010.

Compared to the literature on the effects of organizational fields, much less is known about how early pioneers struggle for recognition and resources during the course of field formation, and how benign resource mobilization strategies, if overused, may also produce unintended consequences at both individual and collective levels. This dissertation focuses on two complementary processes in the context of field formation: blending and bridging. Important breakthroughs often come from attempts to blend elements from disparate knowledge domains, and legitimating and promoting new ideas requires skill of building new coalitions by bridging multiple "worlds" that all stand to benefit from new ideas. When blending and bridging are not balanced, however, the efforts of entrepreneurs are likely to be subject to the familiar negative consequences of blending and bridging, including unclear identity and increased coordination and evaluation costs. Proper balances of blending and bridging enable those who participate in nascent fields to manage the apparent tensions between their positive and negative consequences.

ISBN: 9781124161204Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017457
Business Administration, General.

Blending and bridging in field formation.
LDR:03469nam a2200301 4500 001 1968650
005 20141210113409.5
008 150210s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124161204
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3418109
035 $a AAI3418109
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Lo, Yu-Chieh (Jade). $3 2105829
245 1 0 $a Blending and bridging in field formation.
300 $a 197 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-09, Section: A, page: 3327.
500 $a Advisers: Mark T. Kennedy; Lynne G. Zucker.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Southern California, 2010.
520 $a Compared to the literature on the effects of organizational fields, much less is known about how early pioneers struggle for recognition and resources during the course of field formation, and how benign resource mobilization strategies, if overused, may also produce unintended consequences at both individual and collective levels. This dissertation focuses on two complementary processes in the context of field formation: blending and bridging. Important breakthroughs often come from attempts to blend elements from disparate knowledge domains, and legitimating and promoting new ideas requires skill of building new coalitions by bridging multiple "worlds" that all stand to benefit from new ideas. When blending and bridging are not balanced, however, the efforts of entrepreneurs are likely to be subject to the familiar negative consequences of blending and bridging, including unclear identity and increased coordination and evaluation costs. Proper balances of blending and bridging enable those who participate in nascent fields to manage the apparent tensions between their positive and negative consequences.
520 $a This argument is tested in two empirical studies and further expanded in a theory chapter. Using the NanoBank data on NSF grants in nanotechnology, the first essay asks how pioneers in a nascent field can use bridging strategies to overcome the liability associated with both the newness of their own ideas and the novelty of the emergent field in which they work, and how these strategies might also backfire if overused. With patent data from NanoBank, the second study inspects how a new institutional logic favoring interdisciplinary research enabled nanotechnology to emerge from the intersections of multiple knowledge domains by blending familiar elements in novel ways. Motivated by findings from these empirical inspections, I sketch a general theory about the role of blending and bridging in the process of field formation in the third essay.
520 $a Overall, I find in this research support for my argument that the struggle between "being innovative" and "being recognizable" is indeed a real tension, but not one that is irresolvable: actors in a nascent field and the emergent field itself can maintain their viability with delicate balances between novelty and familiarity, breadth and focus, and diversity and coherence. By addressing some fundamental tensions associated with blending and bridging processes in the course of field formation, this dissertation hopes to contribute to organization theory and entrepreneurship studies.
590 $a School code: 0208.
650 4 $a Business Administration, General. $3 1017457
650 4 $a Sociology, Organizational. $3 1018023
690 $a 0310
690 $a 0703
710 2 $a University of Southern California. $b Business Administration. $3 1029757
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-09A.
790 $a 0208
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3418109