東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The effects of defendant and juror l...

Estrada, Victoria Christine.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The effects of defendant and juror language use on sentencing recommendations.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The effects of defendant and juror language use on sentencing recommendations./
作者:	Estrada, Victoria Christine.
面頁冊數:	79 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 51-02.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International51-02(E).
標題:	Psychology, Social. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1518198
ISBN:	9781267592606

The effects of defendant and juror language use on sentencing recommendations.
Estrada, Victoria Christine.

The effects of defendant and juror language use on sentencing recommendations. - 79 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 51-02.

Thesis (M.A.)--The University of Texas at El Paso, 2012.

Spanish-language testimony is an extra-legal variable not widely studied in the legal psychology field. More emphasis has been placed on the translation of the testimony as well as accent attitudes. The current study extended research conducted by Stephan and Stephan (1986) to investigate the impact of Spanish-speaking defendants and mock-juror's language use and proficiency on sentencing recommendations. Two hundred and seventy-seven participants from the University of Texas at El Paso read a case vignette of a first-degree aggravated assault and asked were asked to provide sentence recommendations for the defendant. The defendant's testimony was presented in English or Spanish with an English translation, and mock jurors were asked items to assess their English and Spanish language use and proficiency. It was hypothesized that (1) Spanish-speaking defendants would receive harsher sentences, (2) mock jurors high in Spanish proficiency would be more lenient overall, and (3) Spanish-speaking defendants would receive more lenient sentences as Spanish use and proficiency of the participant increased. The results found no significant effects for defendant language, mock-juror language use, or the interaction of the two. However, a significant interaction of mock-juror Spanish proficiency and defendant language was found. Contrary to what had been predicted, it was found that mock jurors high in Spanish proficiency gave more lenient sentence recommendations to English-speaking defendants. As an explanation for this unexpected finding, I hypothesize that Spanish-speaking defendants are experiencing the black-sheep effect (Marques, Yzerbyt, & Leyens, 1988), where individuals are more punitive toward in-group members to protect the positive identity of the group. This speculation should be confirmed through replication in future studies.

ISBN: 9781267592606Subjects--Topical Terms:

529430
Psychology, Social.

The effects of defendant and juror language use on sentencing recommendations.
LDR:02824nam a2200337 4500 001 1968489
005 20141203122239.5
008 150210s2012 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781267592606
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1518198
035 $a AAI1518198
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Estrada, Victoria Christine. $3 2105660
245 1 4 $a The effects of defendant and juror language use on sentencing recommendations.
300 $a 79 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 51-02.
500 $a Adviser: Harmon M. Hosch.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--The University of Texas at El Paso, 2012.
520 $a Spanish-language testimony is an extra-legal variable not widely studied in the legal psychology field. More emphasis has been placed on the translation of the testimony as well as accent attitudes. The current study extended research conducted by Stephan and Stephan (1986) to investigate the impact of Spanish-speaking defendants and mock-juror's language use and proficiency on sentencing recommendations. Two hundred and seventy-seven participants from the University of Texas at El Paso read a case vignette of a first-degree aggravated assault and asked were asked to provide sentence recommendations for the defendant. The defendant's testimony was presented in English or Spanish with an English translation, and mock jurors were asked items to assess their English and Spanish language use and proficiency. It was hypothesized that (1) Spanish-speaking defendants would receive harsher sentences, (2) mock jurors high in Spanish proficiency would be more lenient overall, and (3) Spanish-speaking defendants would receive more lenient sentences as Spanish use and proficiency of the participant increased. The results found no significant effects for defendant language, mock-juror language use, or the interaction of the two. However, a significant interaction of mock-juror Spanish proficiency and defendant language was found. Contrary to what had been predicted, it was found that mock jurors high in Spanish proficiency gave more lenient sentence recommendations to English-speaking defendants. As an explanation for this unexpected finding, I hypothesize that Spanish-speaking defendants are experiencing the black-sheep effect (Marques, Yzerbyt, & Leyens, 1988), where individuals are more punitive toward in-group members to protect the positive identity of the group. This speculation should be confirmed through replication in future studies.
590 $a School code: 0459.
650 4 $a Psychology, Social. $3 529430
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Sociology, Criminology and Penology. $3 1017569
650 4 $a Legal Studies. $3 1669774
650 4 $a Speech Communication. $3 1017408
650 4 $a Hispanic American Studies. $3 1017793
650 4 $a Sociology, Sociolinguistics. $3 1669082
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0627
690 $a 0553
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0737
690 $a 0636
710 2 $a The University of Texas at El Paso. $b Psychology. $3 1680299
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 51-02(E).
790 $a 0459
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2012
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1518198