東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Quantifying relationships between ec...

Klein, Linda Ruth.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Quantifying relationships between ecology and aesthetics in agricultural landscapes.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Quantifying relationships between ecology and aesthetics in agricultural landscapes./
作者:	Klein, Linda Ruth.
面頁冊數:	200 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-11(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-11B(E).
標題:	Biology, Ecology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3587122
ISBN:	9781303241338

Quantifying relationships between ecology and aesthetics in agricultural landscapes.
Klein, Linda Ruth.

Quantifying relationships between ecology and aesthetics in agricultural landscapes. - 200 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-11(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Washington State University, 2013.

Biodiversity decline and ecological degradation continue unabated despite accumulation of ecological knowledge, proliferation of sustainability research, and efforts to conserve natural resources. This paradox underscores the failure of scientific research to communicate its social relevance, acceptability, and applicability or to connect with what humans find ecologically understandable or worthy of care. Acceptable and applicable approaches to nurture long-term, mutually beneficial nature-culture relationships must be conceived within the scale of human perception and linked to experiences that attract our concern. Through established theory and supporting empirical evidence, this research explores and quantifies the potential and limitations for enlisting the human aesthetic connection to landscapes as a mechanism for behavioral change.

ISBN: 9781303241338Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017726
Biology, Ecology.

Quantifying relationships between ecology and aesthetics in agricultural landscapes.
LDR:03688nam a2200313 4500 001 1968022
005 20141121133101.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303241338
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3587122
035 $a AAI3587122
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Klein, Linda Ruth. $3 2105127
245 1 0 $a Quantifying relationships between ecology and aesthetics in agricultural landscapes.
300 $a 200 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-11(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: William G. Hendrix.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Washington State University, 2013.
520 $a Biodiversity decline and ecological degradation continue unabated despite accumulation of ecological knowledge, proliferation of sustainability research, and efforts to conserve natural resources. This paradox underscores the failure of scientific research to communicate its social relevance, acceptability, and applicability or to connect with what humans find ecologically understandable or worthy of care. Acceptable and applicable approaches to nurture long-term, mutually beneficial nature-culture relationships must be conceived within the scale of human perception and linked to experiences that attract our concern. Through established theory and supporting empirical evidence, this research explores and quantifies the potential and limitations for enlisting the human aesthetic connection to landscapes as a mechanism for behavioral change.
520 $a The cultural, ecological, and biophysical attributes of agricultural landscapes provide a compatible and influential context for examining relationships between ecology and aesthetics. However, the emotional power of aesthetic experiences to motivate conservation behavior in agricultural settings will likely depend on the coincidence of ecological function and aesthetic appeal in visual landscape structure. Parallel concerns, intentions, and spatial scale between the disciplines of landscape ecology and landscape architecture expose a potentially synergistic collaboration for investigating landscape structural alternatives that harmonize ecology and aesthetics. The empirical research undertaken herein combines current spatial analysis, design, and modeling tools; digital image simulation; and a landscape preference survey to ask, Can ecological function and aesthetic quality coincide in visible landscape structure?.
520 $a Using geographic information system analysis and digital image simulation software, varying extents and configurations of natural vegetation are integrated into the small-grain farming landscape of Whitman County, Washington. The capacity of these landscape-scale buffer systems to enhance ecological function by reducing soil erosion rates and improving water quality is measured with the Water Erosion Prediction Project model. The influence of the alternative landscape scenarios on aesthetic preference is measured by residents' scenic quality ratings of the simulated scenes presented in a mail survey questionnaire. Results reveal a statistically significant, positive relationship between landscape preference and landscape structure indicative of improved ecological function. Thus, the visually perceptible structural attributes of agricultural landscapes can provide an accurate and coincident indication of both ecological function and aesthetic quality.
590 $a School code: 0251.
650 4 $a Biology, Ecology. $3 1017726
650 4 $a Agriculture, General. $3 1017510
650 4 $a Landscape Architecture. $3 890923
690 $a 0329
690 $a 0473
690 $a 0390
710 2 $a Washington State University. $b Environmental and Natural Resource Sciences. $3 2105128
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-11B(E).
790 $a 0251
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3587122