東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An investigation of the doctoral dis...

Fitt, Melynda Rosalee Harrison.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An investigation of the doctoral dissertation literature review: From the materials we use to prepare students, to the materials that students prepare.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An investigation of the doctoral dissertation literature review: From the materials we use to prepare students, to the materials that students prepare./
作者:	Fitt, Melynda Rosalee Harrison.
面頁冊數:	137 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-04, Section: A, page: 1301.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International73-04A.
標題:	Education, Higher. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3489432
ISBN:	9781267086853

An investigation of the doctoral dissertation literature review: From the materials we use to prepare students, to the materials that students prepare.
Fitt, Melynda Rosalee Harrison.

An investigation of the doctoral dissertation literature review: From the materials we use to prepare students, to the materials that students prepare. - 137 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-04, Section: A, page: 1301.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Utah State University, 2011.

Practically speaking, a well-conducted review of literature is central to a scholar's ability to pose pertinent and timely questions within their field. As part of the culminating written assessment of a Ph.D. candidate, the dissertation literature review provides a unique vantage point to explore future scholars' preparation. In spite of its central role within the research process, research about how future scholars are taught the doctoral competencies necessary to conduct a review of the literature for the dissertation or how the dissertation literature reviews are assessed is limited.

ISBN: 9781267086853Subjects--Topical Terms:

543175
Education, Higher.

An investigation of the doctoral dissertation literature review: From the materials we use to prepare students, to the materials that students prepare.
LDR:02826nam a2200301 4500 001 1967731
005 20141124124225.5
008 150210s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781267086853
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3489432
035 $a AAI3489432
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Fitt, Melynda Rosalee Harrison. $3 2104794
245 1 3 $a An investigation of the doctoral dissertation literature review: From the materials we use to prepare students, to the materials that students prepare.
300 $a 137 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-04, Section: A, page: 1301.
500 $a Adviser: Andrew E. Walker.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Utah State University, 2011.
520 $a Practically speaking, a well-conducted review of literature is central to a scholar's ability to pose pertinent and timely questions within their field. As part of the culminating written assessment of a Ph.D. candidate, the dissertation literature review provides a unique vantage point to explore future scholars' preparation. In spite of its central role within the research process, research about how future scholars are taught the doctoral competencies necessary to conduct a review of the literature for the dissertation or how the dissertation literature reviews are assessed is limited.
520 $a In two separate studies, this research uses the Boote and Beile's Literature Review Scoring Rubric as a framework to explore the textbooks used in the early stages of doctoral education and the quality of dissertation literature reviews from a field of education research. In the first study, seven of the top selling education research methods textbooks from 2010 were analyzed to determine how well they cover the 12 performance criteria on the rubric. While the results were varied, the majority of textbooks were not adequate in their coverage of the performance criteria identified by Boote and Beile. In short, the materials used to prepare doctoral students may not be equal to conveying critical components of the literature review.
520 $a Efforts were then devoted to a replication study of exploring the end results of doctoral training and preparation. In the second study, the Literature Review Scoring Rubric was used to assess the quality of 30 randomly selected dissertation literature reviews from Instructional Technology. The scores of the dissertation literature reviews were also varied. While some dissertation literature reviews in this study were of high quality and scored well, the majority of them were of a lower quality.
590 $a School code: 0241.
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
650 4 $a Education, Evaluation. $3 1669638
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0443
710 2 $a Utah State University. $b Instructional Technology. $3 1026135
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 73-04A.
790 $a 0241
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2011
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3489432