東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

User-centered design of quality of l...

Izard, Jason Patrick.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

User-centered design of quality of life reports for clinical prostate cancer care.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	User-centered design of quality of life reports for clinical prostate cancer care./
Author:	Izard, Jason Patrick.
Description:	23 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-04.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International52-04(E).
Subject:	Health Sciences, Public Health. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1551049
ISBN:	9781303674914

User-centered design of quality of life reports for clinical prostate cancer care.
Izard, Jason Patrick.

User-centered design of quality of life reports for clinical prostate cancer care. - 23 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-04.

Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2013.

Background: Primary treatment of localized prostate cancer can result in bothersome urinary, sexual, and bowel symptoms. Yet clinical application of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires is rare. We employed user-centered design to develop graphical dashboards of prostate cancer patients' questionnaire responses that would facilitate clinical integration of HRQOL measurement. Methods: We interviewed 50 prostate cancer patients and 50 providers, assessed literacy with validated instruments (Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine short form, Subjective Numeracy Scale, Graphical Literacy Scale), and presented participants with prototype dashboards that display prostate cancer-specific HRQOL with elements derived from patient focus groups. We assessed dashboard comprehension and preferences in table, bar, line, and pictograph formats with patient scores contextualized with HRQOL scores of similar patients. Results: Health literacy (mean score 6.8/7) and numeracy (mean score 4.5/6) of patient participants was high. Patients favored bar charts (mean rank 1.8, p=0.12 vs line graphs, p<0.01 vs tables and pictographs); providers demonstrated similar preference for table, bar, and line formats (ranked 1st by 30%, 34%, and 34% of providers, respectively). Providers expressed unsolicited concerns over presentation of comparison group scores (n=19, 38%) and impact on clinic efficiency (n=16, 32%). Conclusions: Based on prostate cancer patient and provider preferences, we developed the design concept of a dynamic HRQOL dashboard that permits a base patient-centered report in bar chart format that can be toggled to other formats and include error bars that frame comparison group scores. Inclusion of lower literacy patients may yield different preferences.

ISBN: 9781303674914Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017659
Health Sciences, Public Health.

User-centered design of quality of life reports for clinical prostate cancer care.
LDR:02652nam a2200277 4500 001 1967689
005 20141124124214.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303674914
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1551049
035 $a AAI1551049
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Izard, Jason Patrick. $3 2104747
245 1 0 $a User-centered design of quality of life reports for clinical prostate cancer care.
300 $a 23 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-04.
500 $a Adviser: Steve Zeliadt.
502 $a Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2013.
520 $a Background: Primary treatment of localized prostate cancer can result in bothersome urinary, sexual, and bowel symptoms. Yet clinical application of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires is rare. We employed user-centered design to develop graphical dashboards of prostate cancer patients' questionnaire responses that would facilitate clinical integration of HRQOL measurement. Methods: We interviewed 50 prostate cancer patients and 50 providers, assessed literacy with validated instruments (Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine short form, Subjective Numeracy Scale, Graphical Literacy Scale), and presented participants with prototype dashboards that display prostate cancer-specific HRQOL with elements derived from patient focus groups. We assessed dashboard comprehension and preferences in table, bar, line, and pictograph formats with patient scores contextualized with HRQOL scores of similar patients. Results: Health literacy (mean score 6.8/7) and numeracy (mean score 4.5/6) of patient participants was high. Patients favored bar charts (mean rank 1.8, p=0.12 vs line graphs, p<0.01 vs tables and pictographs); providers demonstrated similar preference for table, bar, and line formats (ranked 1st by 30%, 34%, and 34% of providers, respectively). Providers expressed unsolicited concerns over presentation of comparison group scores (n=19, 38%) and impact on clinic efficiency (n=16, 32%). Conclusions: Based on prostate cancer patient and provider preferences, we developed the design concept of a dynamic HRQOL dashboard that permits a base patient-centered report in bar chart format that can be toggled to other formats and include error bars that frame comparison group scores. Inclusion of lower literacy patients may yield different preferences.
590 $a School code: 0250.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Public Health. $3 1017659
650 4 $a Information Technology. $3 1030799
690 $a 0573
690 $a 0489
710 2 $a University of Washington. $b Public Health Genetics. $3 2104748
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 52-04(E).
790 $a 0250
791 $a Master's
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1551049