東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Do marine protected areas facilitate...

Walton, Maya Maleka.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Do marine protected areas facilitate coral reef ecosystem health? An investigation of coral disease and its associated factors in Oahu's marine life conservation districts.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Do marine protected areas facilitate coral reef ecosystem health? An investigation of coral disease and its associated factors in Oahu's marine life conservation districts./
作者:	Walton, Maya Maleka.
面頁冊數:	100 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International52-05(E).
標題:	Biology, Ecology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1527512
ISBN:	9781303793028

Do marine protected areas facilitate coral reef ecosystem health? An investigation of coral disease and its associated factors in Oahu's marine life conservation districts.
Walton, Maya Maleka.

Do marine protected areas facilitate coral reef ecosystem health? An investigation of coral disease and its associated factors in Oahu's marine life conservation districts. - 100 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-05.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Hawai'i at Manoa, 2013.

Management actions, such as the use of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), which enhance fish abundance and diversity, could have important downstream impacts on coral reef ecosystem health and coral reef resilience. Past studies have suggested that protection status not only influences the abundance of fish, macroalgal levels, and coral cover but also the number of diseased coral colonies. Despite the awareness of disease as a coral reef stressor, there has been limited research on the prevalence of disease within Oahu's Marine Life Conservation Districts (MLCDs) which function as no take reserves. Coral reef health in Oahu's three MLCDs compared to three comparable unprotected reefs was investigated. Field surveys were used to quantify coral disease prevalence, coral cover, macroalgal cover, fish abundance and diversity, and coral community size structure at each of the sites. Environmental variables including inorganic-organic carbon fractions of sediments and sediment grain size categories were also measured. Disease assemblages were significantly different between locations and across protection boundaries. Biological and environmental parameters as well as protection status were used in statistical models to determine which variables were the best performing explanatory variables for the prevalence and abundance of five common lesion types in Oahu. Four out of five common lesion types for at least one of the three locations, showed significantly higher levels of prevalence within MLCDs compared to adjacent unprotected areas. Percent cover of the host coral species was the strongest predictor for four out of five models of utilizing disease abundance. Additionally, growth anomalies on Porites lobata were more commonly observed on larger colonies than on smaller colonies. Fish density was significantly higher at the Pupukea MLCD compared to the adjacent unprotected area and coral cover was significantly higher in the Hanauma Bay MLCD and Pupukea MLCD compared to adjacent control sites. Finally while fish density and coral cover were higher in some protected areas compared to control areas, there was no detectable difference in macroalgal cover across protection boundaries for all locations. MLCDs may act as a refuge for fish, but their high coral host abundance may make them vulnerable to more frequent and severe disease outbreaks compared to other locations. Finally while current regulations in MLCDs protect some aspects of coral reef ecosystem health, incorporating strategies aimed at watershed management may further improve MLCD effectiveness and provide more comprehensive protection for coral reefs.

ISBN: 9781303793028Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017726
Biology, Ecology.

Do marine protected areas facilitate coral reef ecosystem health? An investigation of coral disease and its associated factors in Oahu's marine life conservation districts.
LDR:03620nam a2200289 4500 001 1964844
005 20141013105129.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303793028
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1527512
035 $a AAI1527512
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Walton, Maya Maleka. $3 2101371
245 1 0 $a Do marine protected areas facilitate coral reef ecosystem health? An investigation of coral disease and its associated factors in Oahu's marine life conservation districts.
300 $a 100 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-05.
500 $a Adviser: Cynthia L. Hunter.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--University of Hawai'i at Manoa, 2013.
520 $a Management actions, such as the use of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), which enhance fish abundance and diversity, could have important downstream impacts on coral reef ecosystem health and coral reef resilience. Past studies have suggested that protection status not only influences the abundance of fish, macroalgal levels, and coral cover but also the number of diseased coral colonies. Despite the awareness of disease as a coral reef stressor, there has been limited research on the prevalence of disease within Oahu's Marine Life Conservation Districts (MLCDs) which function as no take reserves. Coral reef health in Oahu's three MLCDs compared to three comparable unprotected reefs was investigated. Field surveys were used to quantify coral disease prevalence, coral cover, macroalgal cover, fish abundance and diversity, and coral community size structure at each of the sites. Environmental variables including inorganic-organic carbon fractions of sediments and sediment grain size categories were also measured. Disease assemblages were significantly different between locations and across protection boundaries. Biological and environmental parameters as well as protection status were used in statistical models to determine which variables were the best performing explanatory variables for the prevalence and abundance of five common lesion types in Oahu. Four out of five common lesion types for at least one of the three locations, showed significantly higher levels of prevalence within MLCDs compared to adjacent unprotected areas. Percent cover of the host coral species was the strongest predictor for four out of five models of utilizing disease abundance. Additionally, growth anomalies on Porites lobata were more commonly observed on larger colonies than on smaller colonies. Fish density was significantly higher at the Pupukea MLCD compared to the adjacent unprotected area and coral cover was significantly higher in the Hanauma Bay MLCD and Pupukea MLCD compared to adjacent control sites. Finally while fish density and coral cover were higher in some protected areas compared to control areas, there was no detectable difference in macroalgal cover across protection boundaries for all locations. MLCDs may act as a refuge for fish, but their high coral host abundance may make them vulnerable to more frequent and severe disease outbreaks compared to other locations. Finally while current regulations in MLCDs protect some aspects of coral reef ecosystem health, incorporating strategies aimed at watershed management may further improve MLCD effectiveness and provide more comprehensive protection for coral reefs.
590 $a School code: 0085.
650 4 $a Biology, Ecology. $3 1017726
650 4 $a Biology, Conservation. $3 1669964
650 4 $a Biology, Zoology. $3 1018632
690 $a 0329
690 $a 0408
690 $a 0472
710 2 $a University of Hawai'i at Manoa. $3 1017511
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 52-05(E).
790 $a 0085
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1527512