東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Bargaining outside the shadow of war.

Hirose, Kentaro.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Bargaining outside the shadow of war.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Bargaining outside the shadow of war./
Author:	Hirose, Kentaro.
Description:	132 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-01A(E).
Subject:	Political Science, General. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3595918
ISBN:	9781303422935

Bargaining outside the shadow of war.
Hirose, Kentaro.

Bargaining outside the shadow of war. - 132 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-01(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2013.

Scholars of international relations have long considered that states become more likely to use some form of military coercion, be it the use of force or the explicit or implicit threat to use force, as they get stronger relative to their adversaries.

ISBN: 9781303422935Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017391
Political Science, General.

Bargaining outside the shadow of war.
LDR:02450nam a2200313 4500 001 1964451
005 20141010092033.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303422935
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3595918
035 $a AAI3595918
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hirose, Kentaro. $3 2100909
245 1 0 $a Bargaining outside the shadow of war.
300 $a 132 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-01(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Duncan Snidal.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2013.
520 $a Scholars of international relations have long considered that states become more likely to use some form of military coercion, be it the use of force or the explicit or implicit threat to use force, as they get stronger relative to their adversaries.
520 $a The dissertation challenges this widely-accepted view of power politics.
520 $a I argue that stronger states are, in fact, unlikely to influence weaker states with any form of military coercion. By definition, strong states are rich in material resources, while weak states are poor. Hence, stronger states can buy off weaker states with side-payments, which lowers their need to use military force. Since war is costly and stronger states can get what they want even without using force (through side-payments), they are unlikely to be able to credibly commit themselves to using force. As a result of this commitment problem for stronger states, they should be unlikely to influence weaker states with any form of military coercion, be it the use of force or the explicit or implicit threat to use force.
520 $a Using the data on military disputes and international crises, the dissertation presents empirical evidence supporting my argument. Specifically, I find that increases in states' relative power initially make them more likely to use military coercion, but further increases in their relative power make them less likely to do so. This non-monotonicity implies a security dilemma for weaker states---i.e., the security of weaker states decreases with their relative power. Power and security do not always go together.
590 $a School code: 0330.
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
650 4 $a Political Science, International Relations. $3 1669648
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0601
710 2 $a The University of Chicago. $b Political Science. $3 1675606
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-01A(E).
790 $a 0330
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3595918