東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Relationship Between Growth in Stude...

Henrikson, Robin.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Relationship Between Growth in Student Learning in Mathematics and Characteristics of Effective Teacher Professional Development.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Relationship Between Growth in Student Learning in Mathematics and Characteristics of Effective Teacher Professional Development./
作者:	Henrikson, Robin.
面頁冊數:	121 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-07(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-07A(E).
標題:	Education, Teacher Training. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3537502
ISBN:	9781267981790

Relationship Between Growth in Student Learning in Mathematics and Characteristics of Effective Teacher Professional Development.
Henrikson, Robin.

Relationship Between Growth in Student Learning in Mathematics and Characteristics of Effective Teacher Professional Development. - 121 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-07(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Seattle Pacific University, 2013.

The primary purpose of this study was to determine significant relationships between growth in student learning in mathematics and characteristics of effective teacher professional development and teacher demographics. The goal was to determine whether certain characteristics of professional development, as measured by the Characteristics of Effective Professional Development survey (Soine, 2010) would significantly predict a growth in student learning over a one-year period of time in mathematics, grades 3-8. The five characteristics measured on the instrument were: (a) Collective Participation, (b) Focus on Teachers' Content Knowledge and How Students Learn Content, (c) Coherence with Teachers' Needs and Circumstances, (d) Active Learning in Classroom, and (e) Active Learning Beyond the Classroom. An additional variable: total time spent in professional development in mathematics, was added. Two multiple regression analyses were conducted. The first analysis was to determine whether certain characteristics of professional development were predictors of student learning. The second multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine whether certain teacher demographics predicted growth in student learning. The tool used to measure growth in student learning was the Measure of Academic Progress (Northwest Evaluation Association; NWEA, 2011). There were no statistically significant relationships found (p < .01) between any of the characteristics of professional development and growth in student learning (r = .38). The variable, Grade Level was found to be a statistically significant predictor of student learning, and found that the lower the grade level the higher the growth in Measure of Academic Progress scores ( p < .003). This is the only statistically significant relationship between growth in MAP scores and the four independent variables. A secondary purpose of this study was to determine whether there are statically significant grade level differences in types of professional development activities practiced between grade level bands 3-5 and 6-8. Multiple independent t-tests were conducted to determine whether there were any significant group differences between the independent variables: the five characteristics of professional development, plus hours spent on professional development activities and the dependent variable, grade level. The two-tailed values were all between p ≥ .103 and p ≥ .968, and can conclude that there are no significant differences between the means of the two groups. Further research needs to be done to continue to explore strategies for consistently implementing effective teaching practices. Furthermore, the results of this study indicate a need to find more effective ways to measure the implementation of effective practices learned from professional development activities.

ISBN: 9781267981790Subjects--Topical Terms:

783747
Education, Teacher Training.

Relationship Between Growth in Student Learning in Mathematics and Characteristics of Effective Teacher Professional Development.
LDR:03817nam a2200289 4500 001 1962327
005 20140805141047.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781267981790
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3537502
035 $a AAI3537502
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Henrikson, Robin. $3 2098391
245 1 0 $a Relationship Between Growth in Student Learning in Mathematics and Characteristics of Effective Teacher Professional Development.
300 $a 121 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-07(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Andrew T. Lumpe.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Seattle Pacific University, 2013.
520 $a The primary purpose of this study was to determine significant relationships between growth in student learning in mathematics and characteristics of effective teacher professional development and teacher demographics. The goal was to determine whether certain characteristics of professional development, as measured by the Characteristics of Effective Professional Development survey (Soine, 2010) would significantly predict a growth in student learning over a one-year period of time in mathematics, grades 3-8. The five characteristics measured on the instrument were: (a) Collective Participation, (b) Focus on Teachers' Content Knowledge and How Students Learn Content, (c) Coherence with Teachers' Needs and Circumstances, (d) Active Learning in Classroom, and (e) Active Learning Beyond the Classroom. An additional variable: total time spent in professional development in mathematics, was added. Two multiple regression analyses were conducted. The first analysis was to determine whether certain characteristics of professional development were predictors of student learning. The second multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine whether certain teacher demographics predicted growth in student learning. The tool used to measure growth in student learning was the Measure of Academic Progress (Northwest Evaluation Association; NWEA, 2011). There were no statistically significant relationships found (p < .01) between any of the characteristics of professional development and growth in student learning (r = .38). The variable, Grade Level was found to be a statistically significant predictor of student learning, and found that the lower the grade level the higher the growth in Measure of Academic Progress scores ( p < .003). This is the only statistically significant relationship between growth in MAP scores and the four independent variables. A secondary purpose of this study was to determine whether there are statically significant grade level differences in types of professional development activities practiced between grade level bands 3-5 and 6-8. Multiple independent t-tests were conducted to determine whether there were any significant group differences between the independent variables: the five characteristics of professional development, plus hours spent on professional development activities and the dependent variable, grade level. The two-tailed values were all between p ≥ .103 and p ≥ .968, and can conclude that there are no significant differences between the means of the two groups. Further research needs to be done to continue to explore strategies for consistently implementing effective teaching practices. Furthermore, the results of this study indicate a need to find more effective ways to measure the implementation of effective practices learned from professional development activities.
590 $a School code: 1043.
650 4 $a Education, Teacher Training. $3 783747
650 4 $a Education, Adult and Continuing. $3 626632
650 4 $a Education, Continuing. $3 824875
690 $a 0530
690 $a 0516
690 $a 0651
710 2 $a Seattle Pacific University. $3 1021997
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-07A(E).
790 $a 1043
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3537502