東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Colonization and Madness: Involuntar...

Gough, Heather Robyn.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Colonization and Madness: Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment Law and Policy Frameworks as Applied to American Indians.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Colonization and Madness: Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment Law and Policy Frameworks as Applied to American Indians./
Author:	Gough, Heather Robyn.
Description:	209 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-08A(E).
Subject:	Law. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3559612
ISBN:	9781303048630

Colonization and Madness: Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment Law and Policy Frameworks as Applied to American Indians.
Gough, Heather Robyn.

Colonization and Madness: Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment Law and Policy Frameworks as Applied to American Indians. - 209 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2013.

This dissertation project is a legal and policy analysis of California's involuntary psychiatric commitment laws and policy as applied to American Indians (AI). Mental health-based civil commitment and conservatorships constitute some of the most severe intrusions into personal liberties and freedom outside of the criminal justice system. In the context of AI peoples and tribal Nations, however, these intrusions implicate not only individual freedoms and well-being but also larger notions of tribal sovereignty, self-determination, culture, and the dialectic relationship between individual identity and community knowledge related to definitions of health, illness and the social meaning of difference. Yet, in the context of involuntary psychiatric commitments, the law reflects a failure to understand this relationship, alternating between strategic use of the sovereignty doctrine to deny access to services or, alternatively, wholly absenting issues of sovereignty and Indigenous worldviews from legal discourse. This project explores the nuanced ways in which these issues are weaved into the fabric of mental health law and policy and how they function to codify, enact and maintain colonization for AI peoples and Nations.

ISBN: 9781303048630Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.

Colonization and Madness: Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment Law and Policy Frameworks as Applied to American Indians.
LDR:02179nam a2200289 4500 001 1961200
005 20140701145402.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303048630
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3559612
035 $a AAI3559612
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Gough, Heather Robyn. $3 2097035
245 1 0 $a Colonization and Madness: Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment Law and Policy Frameworks as Applied to American Indians.
300 $a 209 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Bryan McK. J. Brayboy.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2013.
520 $a This dissertation project is a legal and policy analysis of California's involuntary psychiatric commitment laws and policy as applied to American Indians (AI). Mental health-based civil commitment and conservatorships constitute some of the most severe intrusions into personal liberties and freedom outside of the criminal justice system. In the context of AI peoples and tribal Nations, however, these intrusions implicate not only individual freedoms and well-being but also larger notions of tribal sovereignty, self-determination, culture, and the dialectic relationship between individual identity and community knowledge related to definitions of health, illness and the social meaning of difference. Yet, in the context of involuntary psychiatric commitments, the law reflects a failure to understand this relationship, alternating between strategic use of the sovereignty doctrine to deny access to services or, alternatively, wholly absenting issues of sovereignty and Indigenous worldviews from legal discourse. This project explores the nuanced ways in which these issues are weaved into the fabric of mental health law and policy and how they function to codify, enact and maintain colonization for AI peoples and Nations.
590 $a School code: 0010.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Social Work. $3 617587
650 4 $a Native American Studies. $3 626633
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0452
690 $a 0740
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b Justice Studies. $3 1679257
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-08A(E).
790 $a 0010
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3559612