東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Archiving authors: Rethinking the an...

Douglas, Jennifer Lynn.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Archiving authors: Rethinking the analysis and representation of personal archives.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Archiving authors: Rethinking the analysis and representation of personal archives./
作者:	Douglas, Jennifer Lynn.
面頁冊數:	305 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-05(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-05A(E).
標題:	Information Science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NR96072
ISBN:	9780494960721

Archiving authors: Rethinking the analysis and representation of personal archives.
Douglas, Jennifer Lynn.

Archiving authors: Rethinking the analysis and representation of personal archives. - 305 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-05(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2013.

Personal archives are those created by individuals for their own individual needs and purposes. As a category of archive, personal archives are under-studied and under-represented in the archival literature. This dissertation seeks to fill some of the gaps identified by archival theorists by investigating the nature of personal archives and the application of foundational principles of archival theory to them. Focusing on the archives of a particular sub-set of creators, literary authors, I question both recent and persistent trends toward a psychological or character-based approach to personal archives, and call attention to the limitations of past and current interpretations of the principle of provenance (and its sub-principles, the principle of respect for original order and the principle of respect des fonds) as it is understood in relation and applied to writers' archives. I argue that archival theory is too strongly oriented toward the creator of archives as referent rather than to the archive itself as referent, and propose the need for a stronger focus, both in theory and in practice, on the various individuals and processes that shape an archive. Finally, I call for more candid descriptive practices that better convey to researchers the complicated life histories of the archives they consult and that admit the degree to which archives are the self-conscious constructs of a variety of archival agents.

ISBN: 9780494960721Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017528
Information Science.

Archiving authors: Rethinking the analysis and representation of personal archives.
LDR:02341nam a2200289 4500 001 1960643
005 20140623111242.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780494960721
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAINR96072
035 $a AAINR96072
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Douglas, Jennifer Lynn. $3 2096340
245 1 0 $a Archiving authors: Rethinking the analysis and representation of personal archives.
300 $a 305 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-05(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Heather MacNeil.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2013.
520 $a Personal archives are those created by individuals for their own individual needs and purposes. As a category of archive, personal archives are under-studied and under-represented in the archival literature. This dissertation seeks to fill some of the gaps identified by archival theorists by investigating the nature of personal archives and the application of foundational principles of archival theory to them. Focusing on the archives of a particular sub-set of creators, literary authors, I question both recent and persistent trends toward a psychological or character-based approach to personal archives, and call attention to the limitations of past and current interpretations of the principle of provenance (and its sub-principles, the principle of respect for original order and the principle of respect des fonds) as it is understood in relation and applied to writers' archives. I argue that archival theory is too strongly oriented toward the creator of archives as referent rather than to the archive itself as referent, and propose the need for a stronger focus, both in theory and in practice, on the various individuals and processes that shape an archive. Finally, I call for more candid descriptive practices that better convey to researchers the complicated life histories of the archives they consult and that admit the degree to which archives are the self-conscious constructs of a variety of archival agents.
590 $a School code: 0779.
650 4 $a Information Science. $3 1017528
650 4 $a Library Science. $3 881164
650 4 $a Web Studies. $3 1026830
690 $a 0723
690 $a 0399
690 $a 0646
710 2 $a University of Toronto (Canada). $3 1017674
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-05A(E).
790 $a 0779
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NR96072