東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

European Union Institutions, Democra...

Howard, Lizette Guevara.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

European Union Institutions, Democratic Discourse, and the Color Revolutions.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	European Union Institutions, Democratic Discourse, and the Color Revolutions./
作者:	Howard, Lizette Guevara.
面頁冊數:	224 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-08A(E).
標題:	European Studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3559012
ISBN:	9781303038594

European Union Institutions, Democratic Discourse, and the Color Revolutions.
Howard, Lizette Guevara.

European Union Institutions, Democratic Discourse, and the Color Revolutions. - 224 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of South Florida, 2013.

Since the Treaty of the European Union in 1993, the EU has embraced institutional reforms with the stated purpose of achieving greater unity in foreign affairs. Despite the EU's leading role in the political and economic reforms of former Soviet satellites in Central and Eastern Europe, the EU has been less consistent and cohesive in former Soviet space further east---in regions fraught with undemocratic qualities and places where the EU enjoys fewer credible incentives and less leverage. While scholars point to divergent national interests as obstacles for unity abroad, few have unraveled how the institutions of the EU itself pose challenges as well. This research asks whether the institutions of the EU---particularly the Commission, the Council, and the Parliament---promote or hinder the EU's ability to act as a global unitary actor. It analyzes EU institutional democratic discourse in three cases of color revolutions in former Soviet space from 2003 to 2011: Georgia, Ukraine, and the Kyrgyz Republic. The research is based on a qualitative database of official institutional documents from the European Commission, the Council of the European Union, and the European Parliament to identify patterns of discourse in the construction of democracy. The study finds that, across the institutions, democratic discourse is only consistent in the minimal requisites of democracy---particularly elections and rule of law---but the institutions diverge substantially on whether these elements are necessary and sufficient, versus necessary but insufficient. Even if member-states find common ground at the national level, the institutional dynamics of the EU continue to undermine its ability to assert itself as a unitary actor in foreign affairs. The findings of this study have implications for theories on international relations, democracy, and states. It demonstrates that there are limits to mainstream liberal institutionalist approaches best captured by constructivism, and that the EU as a whole, the institutions of the EU, and the constituent member-states can all become actors with competing interests in a given issue area. The study concludes with potential avenues of future research.

ISBN: 9781303038594Subjects--Topical Terms:

1673271
European Studies.

European Union Institutions, Democratic Discourse, and the Color Revolutions.
LDR:03103nam a2200289 4500 001 1958706
005 20140426114413.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303038594
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3559012
035 $a AAI3559012
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Howard, Lizette Guevara. $3 2093867
245 1 0 $a European Union Institutions, Democratic Discourse, and the Color Revolutions.
300 $a 224 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Mark Amen.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of South Florida, 2013.
520 $a Since the Treaty of the European Union in 1993, the EU has embraced institutional reforms with the stated purpose of achieving greater unity in foreign affairs. Despite the EU's leading role in the political and economic reforms of former Soviet satellites in Central and Eastern Europe, the EU has been less consistent and cohesive in former Soviet space further east---in regions fraught with undemocratic qualities and places where the EU enjoys fewer credible incentives and less leverage. While scholars point to divergent national interests as obstacles for unity abroad, few have unraveled how the institutions of the EU itself pose challenges as well. This research asks whether the institutions of the EU---particularly the Commission, the Council, and the Parliament---promote or hinder the EU's ability to act as a global unitary actor. It analyzes EU institutional democratic discourse in three cases of color revolutions in former Soviet space from 2003 to 2011: Georgia, Ukraine, and the Kyrgyz Republic. The research is based on a qualitative database of official institutional documents from the European Commission, the Council of the European Union, and the European Parliament to identify patterns of discourse in the construction of democracy. The study finds that, across the institutions, democratic discourse is only consistent in the minimal requisites of democracy---particularly elections and rule of law---but the institutions diverge substantially on whether these elements are necessary and sufficient, versus necessary but insufficient. Even if member-states find common ground at the national level, the institutional dynamics of the EU continue to undermine its ability to assert itself as a unitary actor in foreign affairs. The findings of this study have implications for theories on international relations, democracy, and states. It demonstrates that there are limits to mainstream liberal institutionalist approaches best captured by constructivism, and that the EU as a whole, the institutions of the EU, and the constituent member-states can all become actors with competing interests in a given issue area. The study concludes with potential avenues of future research.
590 $a School code: 0206.
650 4 $a European Studies. $3 1673271
650 4 $a Political Science, International Relations. $3 1669648
650 4 $a East European Studies. $3 1672281
690 $a 0440
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0437
710 2 $a University of South Florida. $b Government and International Affairs. $3 2093708
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-08A(E).
790 $a 0206
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3559012