東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An Evaluation of Teaching Methods Ba...

Siebenmorgen, Ryan Patrick.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An Evaluation of Teaching Methods Based on Cognitive Achievement.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An Evaluation of Teaching Methods Based on Cognitive Achievement./
作者:	Siebenmorgen, Ryan Patrick.
面頁冊數:	88 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International52-01(E).
標題:	Education, Agricultural. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1542998
ISBN:	9781303286131

An Evaluation of Teaching Methods Based on Cognitive Achievement.
Siebenmorgen, Ryan Patrick.

An Evaluation of Teaching Methods Based on Cognitive Achievement. - 88 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-01.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Arkansas, 2013.

The purpose of this study was to determine if there were any significant differences (p < .05) in cognitive achievement between different instructional techniques on students enrolled in high school agricultural science classes in Northwest Arkansas. Lesson content covered the production, uses, and performance of biodiesel fuels in compression engines. Treatments were different instructional techniques including lecture, demonstration, and a combination of lecture and demonstration. Cognitive achievement was measured on low level cognition and high level cognition. In addition, this study sought to find any correlation between student perceptions of lecture versus demonstration and tinkering self-efficacy on student achievement.

ISBN: 9781303286131Subjects--Topical Terms:

1022852
Education, Agricultural.

An Evaluation of Teaching Methods Based on Cognitive Achievement.
LDR:03086nam 2200289 4500 001 1958051
005 20140224122706.5
008 150212s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303286131
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1542998
035 $a AAI1542998
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Siebenmorgen, Ryan Patrick. $3 2093019
245 1 3 $a An Evaluation of Teaching Methods Based on Cognitive Achievement.
300 $a 88 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-01.
500 $a Adviser: Don Edgar.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--University of Arkansas, 2013.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to determine if there were any significant differences (p < .05) in cognitive achievement between different instructional techniques on students enrolled in high school agricultural science classes in Northwest Arkansas. Lesson content covered the production, uses, and performance of biodiesel fuels in compression engines. Treatments were different instructional techniques including lecture, demonstration, and a combination of lecture and demonstration. Cognitive achievement was measured on low level cognition and high level cognition. In addition, this study sought to find any correlation between student perceptions of lecture versus demonstration and tinkering self-efficacy on student achievement.
520 $a A true experimental pretest-posttest design (#2) was used to conduct this research (Campbell & Stanley, 1996). The population consisted of all students enrolled in high school agricultural science courses in the spring of 2011. A sample population was used consisting of 27 intact classes ( N=333). Nine classes were used per treatment. Subjects were taught using any (but only one per subject group) of the three treatments based on random selection. Every subject received a pretest prior to the lesson and then posttest following the treatment. Student perceptions of tinkering self-efficacy and perceptions of demonstration and lecture were collected for every subject.
520 $a Data collected for this study revealed no significant difference across instructional techniques on knowledge acquisition (F(2)=0.68, p=.52). However, when comparing treatments and cognitive achievement, there was a significant difference between the combination technique (2.92, SD .55) and the lecture technique (2.00, SD .65) on high cognitive achievement. There was not a significant difference on students' cognitive achievement on low level cognition. There was not a significant correlation between student perceptions (preference) of instructional technique and knowledge acquisition. Nor was there a significant correlation between student perceptions of tinkering self-efficacy and knowledge acquisition. There was a significant correlation between tinkering self-efficacy and student preference of instructional technique.
590 $a School code: 0011.
650 4 $a Education, Agricultural. $3 1022852
690 $a 0517
710 2 $a University of Arkansas. $b Agricultural and Extension Education. $3 2093020
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 52-01(E).
790 $a 0011
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1542998