東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Differences Between Hydraulic and Ma...

Senawi, Karl.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Differences Between Hydraulic and Machine Room Less (MRL) Elevator Systems.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Differences Between Hydraulic and Machine Room Less (MRL) Elevator Systems./
作者:	Senawi, Karl.
面頁冊數:	219 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-09A(E).
標題:	Engineering, Mechanical. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3560689
ISBN:	9781303071393

Differences Between Hydraulic and Machine Room Less (MRL) Elevator Systems.
Senawi, Karl.

Differences Between Hydraulic and Machine Room Less (MRL) Elevator Systems. - 219 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Walden University, 2013.

Over the last 70 years, most elevator installations have been hydraulic elevator systems. However, there has been a lack of research comparing hydraulic and machine room less (MRL) elevators and the factors that influence elevator efficiency. As a result, elevator purchasers lack understanding about elevator performance, resulting in wasted investments, inefficient energy use, and excessive life-cycle costs. The purpose of this study was to determine if hydraulic elevators are as efficient as MRL elevators and to identify which factors influence three measures of overall efficiency: performance, energy consumption, and life cycle cost. Multiple linear regression was used to evaluate the influence of multiple factors (including elevator type) on each of 3 response variables. Data were obtained from industry-accepted models of elevator performance. The findings indicated that significant differences exist between hydraulic and MRL elevators. In relation to performance and energy consumption, the analysis provided strong results in favor of MRL elevators, whereas for life cycle cost, the analysis provided strong results in favor of hydraulic elevators. In addition, 3 factors were significant influences and predictors of all 3 response variables (elevator model, elevator speed, and floors traveled), while others were not significant for all 3 variables. The findings may lead to positive social change by enabling building operators to choose elevator systems that reduce a building's carbon footprint, eliminate the potential for soil contaminants, and reduce energy consumption associated with elevators. Further, this research may assist purchasers in making tradeoffs among competing factors to make wise selections and to cope with the rising cost of building construction and maintenance.

ISBN: 9781303071393Subjects--Topical Terms:

783786
Engineering, Mechanical.

Differences Between Hydraulic and Machine Room Less (MRL) Elevator Systems.
LDR:02773nam 2200301 4500 001 1957580
005 20140106101308.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303071393
035 $a (UMI)AAI3560689
035 $a AAI3560689
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Senawi, Karl. $3 2092518
245 1 0 $a Differences Between Hydraulic and Machine Room Less (MRL) Elevator Systems.
300 $a 219 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Branford McAllister.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Walden University, 2013.
520 $a Over the last 70 years, most elevator installations have been hydraulic elevator systems. However, there has been a lack of research comparing hydraulic and machine room less (MRL) elevators and the factors that influence elevator efficiency. As a result, elevator purchasers lack understanding about elevator performance, resulting in wasted investments, inefficient energy use, and excessive life-cycle costs. The purpose of this study was to determine if hydraulic elevators are as efficient as MRL elevators and to identify which factors influence three measures of overall efficiency: performance, energy consumption, and life cycle cost. Multiple linear regression was used to evaluate the influence of multiple factors (including elevator type) on each of 3 response variables. Data were obtained from industry-accepted models of elevator performance. The findings indicated that significant differences exist between hydraulic and MRL elevators. In relation to performance and energy consumption, the analysis provided strong results in favor of MRL elevators, whereas for life cycle cost, the analysis provided strong results in favor of hydraulic elevators. In addition, 3 factors were significant influences and predictors of all 3 response variables (elevator model, elevator speed, and floors traveled), while others were not significant for all 3 variables. The findings may lead to positive social change by enabling building operators to choose elevator systems that reduce a building's carbon footprint, eliminate the potential for soil contaminants, and reduce energy consumption associated with elevators. Further, this research may assist purchasers in making tradeoffs among competing factors to make wise selections and to cope with the rising cost of building construction and maintenance.
590 $a School code: 0543.
650 4 $a Engineering, Mechanical. $3 783786
650 4 $a Technical Communication. $3 1669287
650 4 $a Transportation. $3 555912
690 $a 0548
690 $a 0643
690 $a 0709
710 2 $a Walden University. $b Applied Management and Decision Sciences. $3 1017738
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-09A(E).
790 1 0 $a McAllister, Branford, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Sharifzadeh, Mohammad $e committee member
790 $a 0543
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3560689